How to Prevent Iran from Going Nuclear?



Yesterday President Bush began banging the war drums again about Iran acquiring nuclear weapons and invoking WWIII. That is the last thing we or the world needs.

The key to preventing Iran from developing their own nuclear weapons is to provide for monitoring their uranium enrichment activities. A concentration of 5% uranium is needed for use as fuel in a nuclear reactor like the one the Russians are helping the Iranians build. The concentration needed for a nuclear weapon is 96%. To concentrate uranium from 5% to 96% is no easy task. It requires thousands of centrifuges and even then takes a great deal of time to produce 96% pure uranium. Thus the way to insure Iran is not making bombs is to monitor their uranium processing.

What Bush should be doing is working with the Russians and the IAEA to develop an agreement with Iran to station IAEA and Russian technicians at the uranium processing sights to monitor the concentration of uranium being produced by Iran.

Why would Russia or Iran agree to such a process? For an agreement with the U.S. that we will not attack nor allow Israel to attack their nuclear facilities so long as the monitors certify the uranium being produced by Iran does not exceed 5% concentration levels. That would protect the ongoing Russian interest in doing business with Iran and would allow Iran to complete and operate their nuclear facility to produce electricity.

In order to get Russia, which is the key to this agreement to cooperate with the U.S., Bush must stop threatening to install the missile defense system in former soviet satellites. He must develop an atmosphere between the U.S. and Russia that will allow such an agreement to be established. The Russians hold the cards with the Iranians- Iran needs Russia to complete their reactor and to provide essential maintenance and technical support to operate it in the future. If we or Israel were to attack the reactor the Russians are helping the Iranians build, there is no assurance that would stop the uranium concentration process if that is being conducted deep underground.

Such an agreement does run the risk of the Iranians operating concentration facilities that are not known to the monitors. However by keeping track of all uranium ore that comes into to Iran it should be possible to detect an effort to divert that ore to the production of weapons grade uranium because the amount of uranium ore that would be needed to produce enough 96% pure uranium for weapons should be detectable. At the same time we must work with the Russians to control existing weapons grade materials that were part of the old Soviet Union. Even if we prevent the production of new fissionable material by Iran, we must also prevent Iran or any one else from obtaining existing supplies to prevent the construction of a nuclear weapon by Iran of any other terrorist group!

What ever the risks are in using this approach they are a lot less then risking WWIII like Bush talked about yesterday in his news conference.
13,015 views 39 replies
Reply #1 Top
so you want to put isreals fate into the hands of three of its enemies. with no input from the usa.
Reply #2 Top
Reply By: danielost Posted: Thursday, October 18, 2007
so you want to put isreals fate into the hands of three of its enemies. with no input from the usa.


NO. If Iran does not obtain nuclear weapons, they are no threat to Israel. Israel has the most powerful military in the region and most likely has nuclear weapons. Iran without nukes is no danger to Israel.
Reply #3 Top
Col,

In many ways I am in agreement with you. I agree that our missile defense implementation has caused Russia to abandon US interest and seek their own as we reflect little interest towards theirs.

If I was Israel and US the question that I would HAVE to ask is. Who do you propose would be responsible for monitoring Iran's Uranium?
Reply #4 Top
so you want to put isreals fate into the hands of three of its enemies. with no input from the usa.


it would be a good idea for the kid to stand on it's own against big boys. It's the military powerhouse of the middle-east, after all... And it has nuclear weapons.
Reply #5 Top
Threaten to send the Clueless Old Liberal over to start writing about Ahminiwhatever.  Iran would give up in seconds.
Reply #6 Top
Who do you propose would be responsible for monitoring Iran's Uranium?

I suggested the IAEA and Technicians from Russia.
Reply #7 Top



Reply By: terpfan1980 Posted: Thursday, October 18, 2007
Threaten to send the Clueless Old Liberal over to start writing about Ahminiwhatever. Iran would give up in seconds.

YOU truly show just how big a fool you are!
Reply #8 Top
iran wants isreal dead.


russia wants isreal dead.


the united nations condemns isreal with almost every resolution that we cannot stop for what ever reasons.


and you want those three groups to work together to insure the safety of isreal. and you want to tie isreals hands so they cannot defend themselves.
Reply #9 Top
iran wants isreal dead.


russia wants isreal dead.


the united nations condemns isreal with almost every resolution that we cannot stop for what ever reasons.


and you want those three groups to work together to insure the safty of isreal. and you want to tie isreals hands so they cannot defend themselves.


Short, Sweet, and to the point.
Reply #10 Top
Reply By: danielost Posted: Thursday, October 18, 2007
“Iran wants Israel dead.


Russia wants Israel dead.


The United Nations condemns Israel with almost every resolution that we cannot stop for what ever reasons.


And you want those three groups to work together to insure the safety of Israel. And you want to tie Israelis hands so they cannot defend themselves.”



YES and I have explained WHY. Russia gets to continue their business relations with Iran. Iran can obtain the benefits of the new nuclear plant. Israel gets an Iran, who does hate them from obtaining nuclear weapons. We protect our access to oil that could be placed in jeopardy should an all out war develop between a nuclear Iran and Israel! The is a WIN WIN WIN WIN.
Reply #11 Top
Reply By: Adventure-Dude Posted: Thursday, October 18, 2007
"iran wants isreal dead.


russia wants isreal dead.


the united nations condemns isreal with almost every resolution that we cannot stop for what ever reasons.


and you want those three groups to work together to insure the safty of isreal. and you want to tie isreals hands so they cannot defend themselves.


Short, Sweet, and to the point"


WRONG - Look at my last post!!!!!
Reply #12 Top

WRONG - Look at my last post!!!!!


Col, You want Russia who has a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG list of persecuting Jews to be the overseers of the Uranium. What you seemed to miss (what a surprise) is that I did support your premise however I still disagree with your WHO should over see it. Russia cannot be trusted as I previously mentioned. The UN cannot be trusted because of all the sanctions that they have put against Israel and continue to put against Israel. You have yet to come up with an actual viable overseer.

BTW you do yourself a great deal of discredit by not addressing the point Danielost made and just say we are wrong.
Reply #13 Top
it would be a good idea for the kid to stand on it's own against big boys.

Depends what your ultimate goal is. The kid [Israel] used to stand alone against the big boys before her alliance with the US and the Arabs kept attacking her to drive the Jews into the sea (heck Arab radio stations in the 60s regularly announced that all the Jews would soon be dead). Since the US got involved, there have been no major wars any more. Attacking Israel suddenly means war with the greatest power on earth. That shut the big boys up. Big brothers can be helpful in these situations. If you want to abandon the kid again and let her face the big boys alone, thinking that she will be able to defend herself, the result will be another number of terrible wars when the Arabs feel that they can try to kill all the Jews again. "Good idea" is not the term I would use for war and another Holocaust. But as I said, it depends on what your ultimate goal is. Trying out an experiment and hoping that the results will be different then the last time it was tried is a bit dangerous when we are talking about human lives.
Reply #14 Top
Col, I like your plan. Although I would like to see some changes. Could the KKK and/or some old German Nazis oversee the uranium? I think that both groups might be slightly less anti-Semitic than Russia and Iran together, which might ultimately result in a longer period of peace before the Jews are blown to bits.
Reply #15 Top
"You have yet to come up with an actual viable overseer."


The IAEA is a reliable overseer. Other countries like Jordan, Turkey or Saudi Arabia could also be included. There are ways to resolve the “WHO” to oversee the uranium processing. The concept is however sound. It does give the Israelis, Russians, Iran and the U.S. a much better solution then more ineffective sanctions or bombing Iran which will just make a bad situation worse! All Bush is doing is inflaming the situation and is driving a wedge between the U.S. and Russia. They have the MOST sway with Iran just like China has the most sway with North Korea. The Bush approach is to anger those that have the power to help and shows just how inept he has been in foreign policy. Until he finally got China to use its influence with North Korea NOTHING happened. The Agreement with North Korea is the ONLY Foreign policy achievement of his presidency. Before that agreement is fully implemented what does Bush do? He angers China by giving the Delia lama a gold medal. Bush is a stupid arrogant man who has done more to endanger our country then any president in our history!
Reply #16 Top
It does give the Israelis, Russians, Iran and the U.S. a much better solution then more ineffective sanctions or bombing Iran which will just make a bad situation worse! All Bush is doing is inflaming the situation and is driving a wedge between the U.S. and Russia. They have the MOST sway with Iran just like China has the most sway with North Korea. The Bush approach is to anger those that have the power to help and shows just how inept he has been in foreign policy. Until he finally got China to use its influence with North Korea NOTHING happened. The Agreement with North Korea is the ONLY Foreign policy achievement of his presidency. Before that agreement is fully implemented what does Bush do? He angers China by giving the Delia lama a gold medal. Bush is a stupid arrogant man who has done more to endanger our country then any president in our history!


Blah blah blah, do you even want an intelligent conversation with people? Now you sound like Sen. Spark yesterday. We are actually SUPPORTING your solution except for one tiny little piece while still giving you credit here. This is what drives most (if not all) of your readers crazy! We don't care of your opinion of the other right now. You are on a path to a solution but your rants only show a crazed obsession about Bush. As I said before you may want to talk to a professional about this.

The IAEA is a reliable overseer. Other countries like Jordan, Turkey or Saudi Arabia could also be included.


Yes Jordan, Turkey or Saudi Arabia can over see? Are you kidding? Ummm hello they are also Muslim countries that hate Jews. Why don't you just suggest Chamas or Hezzbulah?

Reply #17 Top
Jordan


this country has a small possibility. it depends on where the loyalties of the person from this country lie.


as if the IAEA or whatever if it is part of the UN don't trust it. the UN observers in Lebanon. you know the ones supposed to keep hezbollah from attacking Israel. just sits there and laughs when the missiles fly.

Reply #18 Top
Ooo, I know what President Bush's plan is to keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons... every time nuclear weapons are discussed, you are to talk in code. The word for Nuclear... is Nucular. Got it?

Who doesn't hate Isreal, besides the United States of America?
Reply #19 Top
Reply By: Jythier Posted: Friday, October 19, 2007
Ooo, I know what President Bush's plan is to keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons... every time nuclear weapons are discussed, you are to talk in code. The word for Nuclear... is Nucular. Got it?


Yes- I had a typo. Let’s follow Bush and attack Iran and start WWIII as he talked about yesterday. At the same time we better reinstitute the draft because we will need a hell of a lot more young people for Bush to set us as targets like he did in Iraq!
Reply #20 Top
Reply By: Jythier Posted: Friday, October 19, 2007
Ooo, I know what President Bush's plan is to keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons... every time nuclear weapons are discussed, you are to talk in code. The word for Nuclear... is Nucular. Got it?


What Bush has done so far has not stopped Iran from moving forward with their Nuclear program. We need to boost the recruiting effort some more for al-Qaeda so even more nuts are willing to attack our country!
Reply #21 Top
The problem Col is the Iranians don't want the IAEA to monitor them (at least not completely). So there lies the rub: we don't want the mouse watching the cheese and they don't want our cat watching the mouse.
Reply #22 Top
isreal has the solution just bomb the facility
Reply #23 Top
isreal has the solution just bomb the facility


which is why I believe it is capable to standing for itself more than ennough
Reply #24 Top
the final war is going to be the united states and isreal versus the united nations.

Reply #25 Top
Depends what your ultimate goal is. The kid [Israel] used to stand alone against the big boys before her alliance with the US and the Arabs kept attacking her to drive the Jews into the sea (heck Arab radio stations in the 60s regularly announced that all the Jews would soon be dead). Since the US got involved, there have been no major wars any more. Attacking Israel suddenly means war with the greatest power on earth. That shut the big boys up. Big brothers can be helpful in these situations. If you want to abandon the kid again and let her face the big boys alone, thinking that she will be able to defend herself, the result will be another number of terrible wars when the Arabs feel that they can try to kill all the Jews again. "Good idea" is not the term I would use for war and another Holocaust. But as I said, it depends on what your ultimate goal is. Trying out an experiment and hoping that the results will be different then the last time it was tried is a bit dangerous when we are talking about human lives.



Well, time has changed since the 60s. Israel now has one of the most efficient and modern army of the region - as opposed to the hastly assembled of the time - and has the nuclear bomb (which no one seems to mind. Israel is the only country in the region - save Iraq- that actually conquered it'S neighbour in the past 50 years)

I don't think Syria would temp fate that much. Except off course if they had Turkey with them.

Jordan is not in a state to wage any war of that scale, and Egypt.. hmm.. I don't know about Egypt.. I think it does not want to loose whatever commercial ties it has with europe.

the united nations condemns isreal with almost every resolution that we cannot stop for what ever reasons


Well, the usual reason U.N. apply sanctions is because the target country broke international laws - which Israel have done on many occasions -.

And the U.S. could simply have vetoed any of those if they felt it was illegitime.

So.. I don't see how you imply that the U.N. are specificly aimed against Israel? Or you just believe that this country can do no wrong?