Why America needs another tail-gunner Joe

Joe McCarthy we need you!!

from JoeUser Forums
We need another Joe McCarthy to shine the light on the Communist that have disguised themselves as Democrats and are bent on destroying America from within. While Joe was a little crazed in his hunt for Communists, right now he would have a field day, there are so many Liberals out there with Communist ideals, Karl Marx would be proud of them. We need to impanel the house of UNAmerican activities again to stop the Mainstream media from their continued distortion of what is really happening in Iraq, and how they continue to slant things to the left, their agenda is so obvious that it is completely UNAmerican. They long ago stop reporting news and have become another press agent for the Democratic party and this needs to be stopped.
7,428 views 21 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
Heh, I thought you wuz a talkin' about me. I was a tail gunner once you know...
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
Not much of a comment here. Just stopping in and saying hi.

Ashes of the Singularity II
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
You're saying the McCarthy witch trials were a GOOD thing?

You surprise me, ModMan . . .
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: SanChoninoPosted: Tuesday, October 16, 2007
You're saying the McCarthy witch trials were a GOOD thing?

nope because he went after the wrong people, his targets today should be the MSM And the far left.

Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: RoyLevoshPosted: Monday, October 15, 2007
Heh, I thought you wuz a talkin' about me. I was a tail gunner once you know...

I did not know that .

Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
Honestly, MM, I have to say I respectfully disagree with you on this. And strongly so.

You're right about the communist infiltration of the government. But it's not hidden. All you need to do is look at the signatories to the World Can't Wait movement, a movement founded and directed by the Revolutionary Communist Party (among them Maxine Waters, Cynthia McKinney and John Conyers). But to destroy the lives of innocent Americans for an agenda is not acceptable.

Free speech is essential to a Democracy, and while it is not wrong to expose the political viewpoints of our leaders, it is, in my estimation, wrong to destroy their lives because of it.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
If serious, I think this really clinches the idea that you're pretty much anything but moderate.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: Gideon MacLeishPosted: Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Honestly, MM, I have to say I respectfully disagree with you on this. And strongly so.

You're right about the communist infiltration of the government. But it's not hidden. All you need to do is look at the signatories to the World Can't Wait movement, a movement founded and directed by the Revolutionary Communist Party (among them Maxine Waters, Cynthia McKinney and John Conyers). But to destroy the lives of innocent Americans for an agenda is not acceptable.

Free speech is essential to a Democracy, and while it is not wrong to expose the political viewpoints of our leaders, it is, in my estimation, wrong to destroy their lives because of it.

I am not talking about going after innocent Americans Gid, I am talking about reigning in the MSM and the far left that has a communist agenda,

The MSM proved it with their reporting of Lt. General Ricardo Sanchez's remarks  about the mishandling of the war and how the MSM is misleading the public, one "reporter" had the nerve to get up and disrespect the general with saying "thank you for the lecture , now can we get back to how bad the war was mismanaged" the next day except for the Washington post their was article after article about how Bush is wrong, bush is bad , bush is an idiot, no mention of the long comments about how the MSM is misleading the public and is killing our troops, proving the generals assertions.

Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: ZoombaPosted: Tuesday, October 16, 2007
If serious, I think this really clinches the idea that you're pretty much anything but moderate.

Ah zoomba, All I am asking for is some fair reporting from the MSM and putting a stop to the farleft and its Communist agenda, hardly a conservative standpoint, but truly just one American worried about the direction the country is taking and how we are being mislead not just by the Bush administration but the farleft and their public relations firm AKA the MSM

Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
unscrupulous reporting, solely focused on supporting an agenda and preconceived notions of the U.S. military."
"What is clear to me is that you are perpetuating the corrosive partisan politics that is destroying our country and killing our service members who are at war. My assessment is that your profession, to some, has strayed from these ethical standards and allowed external agendas to manipulate what the American public sees on TV, reads in newspapers and what they see on the Web,"

the above is in part of a few comments made by General Sanchez, none of which was reported although every negative comment he made about Bush was.
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top

I do not agree with the verbage, but I understand the idea behind it.  YOu can be a communist all you want in this country as it is a free one.  However, I am tired of people hiding behind mis-labels as well.  Progressive is a soup, not a political ideology.  If yuo want to be a communist, then state so.  Dont say you are "for the children (or insert downtrodden minority group here)" and then try to sneak in a communistic agenda.

Truth in labeling.  We have it in commercial advertising.  We should demand it in politics as well.

Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
Progressive is a soup, not a political ideology.


Not all progressives are commies, Dr. Guy.

I believe in some of the goals of progressive movements; I just don't agree with how they go about them.

For instance, a program to help the poor and needy should NEVER be bankrolled by theft. It's far more effective to implement programs from funds people give willingly.

(tooting my own horn): Keep an eye out for my grassroots progressivism articles. I think you'll like them.
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
(Citizen)Dr GuyOctober 16, 2007 13:40:53


I do not agree with the verbage, but I understand the idea behind it. YOu can be a communist all you want in this country as it is a free one. However, I am tired of people hiding behind mis-labels as well. Progressive is a soup, not a political ideology. If yuo want to be a communist, then state so. Dont say you are "for the children (or insert downtrodden minority group here)" and then try to sneak in a communistic agenda.
Truth in labeling. We have it in commercial advertising. We should demand it in politics as well.


I guess I did not make it clear what I was aiming for, but the truth is the farleft has an Agenda and their Agenda is not a proAmerican one. the MSM has an agenda too and it goes hand in hand with the farleft, while claiming to be reporting the news, it is not reporting the news, it is reporting what small part of the news that supports its agenda.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
(Citizen)Gideon MacLeishOctober 16, 2007 13:45:19


Not all progressives are commies, Dr. Guy.


anyone that wants to force you to give to the poor {sharing of wealth} is a commie to me.

For instance, a program to help the poor and needy should NEVER be bankrolled by theft. It's far more effective to implement programs from funds people give willingly.


Yes my point exactly.. why is it that the right give much more to charities that the left does? The left does not mind giving as long as it's your money not theirs.
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
anyone that wants to force you to give to the poor {sharing of wealth} is a commie to me.


I believe, though, that one can be progressive without stealing other people's money to do it. Look for the series, MM, I think you'll like it. I can't present it yet because it's still in the research stage.
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
(Citizen)Gideon MacLeishOctober 16, 2007 13:57:36


anyone that wants to force you to give to the poor {sharing of wealth} is a commie to me.


I believe, though, that one can be progressive without stealing other people's money to do it. Look for the series, MM, I think you'll like it. I can't present it yet because it's still in the research stage.


that will be easy to do since I read all your stuff gid.
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
Gid's definitely a good read.

But America does not need another witch-hunt. It's not unAmerican to hold a certain ideology. It wasn't back then, and it's not now. There's nothing wrong with being a communist, but there is something wrong with being an idiot. There's also something wrong with failing to report news due to political leanings.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
Not all progressives are commies, Dr. Guy.


I did not say that all progressives are commies. And I was going to comment on your blog that the term has been co-opted, but let it lie. But I can tell you what all (current - not your new term) progressives are not, and that is progressive. They use that term to hide what they really are - fearing that the populace would not vote for them if the truth were known.

The truth be known, those who call them selves progressives are really regressives. They want to regress the rights we have fought for and won to a time when old king cole did everything for his people (including jailing them when he burped too loud), and the people were supposed to sit down, shut up and take it.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
JythierOctober 16, 2007 14:24:30


There's also something wrong with failing to report news due to political leanings.


And there seems to be nothing anyone can do to stop them. What they are doing, exposing how we hunt terrorists, exposing the tools we use is tantamount to espionage. They give aid and comfort and propaganda to out enemies and no one can stop them, this is why I say we need another house of unamerican activities.
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top

The joy of being an American is that you can voice any opinion, you can lobby for any change, you can be of any political belief and you don't get rounded up.  You don't get put on trial.  The House Committee on UnAmerican Activities was probably the least American thing the US Government has done in a long long time.

I disagree with much of the agenda most media outlets are pushing (not a single one of them is unbiased or fair, no matter what they claim, they all have a different axe to grind), but no matter how much I disagree with them, unless they're committing actual crimes (i.e. giving material aid to our enemies.  And I don't mean just singing their praises, I mean money, resources etc.) I will never support rounding them up or putting them on trial.

I'm tired of people calling others traitors for having dissenting views.  I remember when the second Iraq war kicked off a few years back, people on this very site said if you didn't support the President in this action that you were a traitor and should be kicked out of the country.

That attitude, and the attitude that we should bring back even a shadow of the McCarthy trials, is more unamerican than anythng else I can think of.

Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
ZoombaOctober 16, 2007 14:56:54


disagree with much of the agenda most media outlets are pushing (not a single one of them is unbiased or fair, no matter what they claim, they all have a different axe to grind), but no matter how much I disagree with them, unless they're committing actual crimes (i.e. giving material aid to our enemies. And I don't mean just singing their praises, I mean money, resources etc.) I will never support rounding them up or putting them on trial.


and just where do you put exposing the tools we use to hunt terrorists down at?

"I'm tired of people calling others traitors for having dissenting views. I remember when the second Iraq war kicked off a few years back, people on this very site said if you didn't support the President in this action that you were a traitor and should be kicked out of the country."

I was not one of those.