Or if we don't stop all that, we could just plant a shit load of trees and cultivate some algae.  They suck up a lot of CO2.

~Zoo

Man affects the earth's climate like a flea affects a dogs direction.

Anything that decomposes creates CO2.  You left out factory farms in your list of CO2 production caused by humans.  Not only do all the livestock produce methane gas, but they also produce CO2 from decomposing waste.  The slaughterhouses also produce CO2 since they have "compost" areas from animal parts that they don't use.  Americans eat way too much meat now.  From the USDA: "In 2005, total meat consumption (red meat, poultry, and fish) amounted to 200 pounds per person, 22 pounds above the level in 1970."   How many people do we have in the US?  Around 303 million?  That's 6,666,000,000 pounds of meat more than 1970.  That is the same as about 5,800,000 cows (entire cows, not just the meat). 

I think that people pollute, but I'm not convinced that we cause global warming.  I think that we cause a lot of our own health problems by our pollution, but I think the suns activity has more to do with the warming trends than humans do.

But, nonetheless, I don't think it is bad for people to try and do a bit to cut down on pollution in whatever way they can.  I drive a lot, but I try to live green otherwise.  Examples:
1) We compost our food scraps (whole house is vegetarians, so it's all veg based) to use in our summer garden or to fertilize our yard.

2) We heat our house with a CO2 neutral source- we have a corn stove.  The exhaust produces less CO2 than the corn consumes while growing, but it's CO2 neutral when you account for the pollution from growing it and transporting it.

3) We use a lot of compact fluorescents and only have lights on when we need to. 

4) We use a/c sparingly.  Even in the summer, we typically don't have over a $65 electric bill.

5) We drive too much, but we drive fuel efficient vehicles.  We also commute together to work.  it's not perfect, but it's better than each of us driving an SUV to work, especially since our cars get twice the mileage as an SUV.

6) We installed low flow shower heads on our showers.  Same shower- just uses less water. 

7) We throw out less than 1/2 bag of garbage a week.  A lot of this is due to the way we eat.  We cook from fresh ingredients, so most of the "waste" gets composted.  Most of our other waste is cardboard, which goes to recycling (one of the products that *does* actually get recycled).  So, there ends up not being much to pitch.

8) I buy a lot of Organic.  They can't use petroleum fertilizers on Organic, nor can they use pesticides.  I think both are bad for you and our water ways.  I'll probably learn at some point that the whole Organic thing is a bunch of bull, but why not try it and see if it helps?

I don't agree with that.  If I were to up and move closer to work right now, I would lose my ass on my house due to the real estate market in Michigan.  People also relocate, or their offices move.  Moving isn't a trivial expense.  What's the point in moving closer to work if you end up bankrupt to do so?  Or, if you end up moving from an energy efficient house into an apartment, which are notorious for being very energy inefficient?

I don't think that people need to be "perfect" to make a change in the amount of pollution that we cause, I think that we just need to cut down on our wastefulness. 

Karma - Let me be clear, I don't think people need to do any of the things I list above because I don't believe that any of those things make one iota of difference to global climate.

I also know that you don't think that CO2 produced by humans is having measurable effect on climate change.   

And our lack of faith in the CO2 global warming hypothesis is based not on emotion but rather having evaluated the relevant data.  People like you and me live our lives based on rational thought. We look at evidence and data and make up our own minds.  And if we hold a belief, we take constructive action to do someting about it.

But time and time again the left-wing of our society chooses to hold beliefs simply because they think believing a thing makes them better people. They do not recognize that beliefs are empy without following those beliefs with deeds.

The onus is on those who have chosen to drink the cool aid and behave sanctimoniously and piously about their belief that CO2 from humans causes global warming and that it's the end of the world.

I believe that most people who have faith in the hypothesis do so out of the same emotional motivations that made people believe witches and spirits controlled the weather. But in this case, those people don't have witches or spirits to blame for the weather. They only have themselves. 

The beauty of human produced global warming is that it is unique in that the emotional left-wing of our society can finally be held responsible for their beliefs.  We can watch and see if they match their beliefs with deeds and the answer is already there -- they don't.  Even Al Gore couldn't be bothered in the many years he's pushed these beliefs to put solar panels on his mansion. That is, they won't even make token gestures to fool the gullible that they match their beliefs with deeds.

Normally, the left's poorly researched, emotional diatribes require other people to pay -- usually the people who don't agree with them. 

But not here, not with global warming. Here, we can demonstrate quite clearly that most left-wingers are posers. Their self-esteem is based on their beliefs rather than their deeds.  And through the CO2 global warming hypothesis they are exposed as the shallow, disengenuous posers they really are.

But, how can anyone really say that what humans do actually makes a difference in "global warming" or the "ozone" or anything at all?  I think that we are polluting the hell out of ourselves, but that has nothing to do with the idea of man made global warming.

Yep, the climate is changing.  However, why do people think that they have so much power over mother nature to think that it is caused by us?  Could it simply be because the sun is more active?  (Remember all the sun spots that have been recking havoc on satellite transmissions?)

I grew up in northern MI.  During the 70's, we would get so much snow that you would literally get snowed in over night and not even be able to see the cars in the driveway.  Each year, the seasons have been getting less and less extreme.  However, other parts of the US have seen changes in weather, too, and it's not all a warming trend.  Why is it not possible that the Earth is simply continuing to change as it always has?  I mean, many parts of the world were covered in ice, and the land masses were in different places.  Were humans responsible for those changes, too?

I think that we (humans) are horrible polluters, and we're killing ourselves by living in our own pollution.  However, I also feel that Mother nature is stronger than any of us, and is just doing what she does.  The Earth changes, and we have very little effect on the end result.

In the end, it won't matter.  People want things to change, but they won't change themselves.  There are too many Gore's in the world- Do what I say even though I don't do it myself. 

He did not begin to make his house more efficient until after he got called out on this.  During the time he was making "An inconvenient truth" he had a house that used 20X as much energy as the normal house.

The private jets and such I can give Gore a pass on. But the fact he did zilch prior to being called out about his own lifestyle speaks volumes.