COL Gene COL Gene

OUR Constitution is Under Attack!

OUR Constitution is Under Attack!




The U.S. Constitution is the foundation for our rights and essential for the success of our nation. The federal government was brought into existence by the people through our Constitution. Second, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land that controls the actions of our public officials in all three branches of the federal government. Every elected official swears to UPHOLD the U.S. Constitution. The very foundations of Our Constitution are being violated by the highest elected officials in America and we are allowing this travesty to take place.

The most basic principal upon which the rights of our system are based is the Separation of Powers. This was intended to split and therefore limit the power of each of the three branches of our government. That principal, which was set out by our founding fathers, can not be violated if our government is to protect the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

Two powers granted to Congress and ONLY to Congress by our Constitution are the power to Declare War and the Power of the Budget. Both of these Congressional responsibilities have been usurped by President Bush. In the case of the budget, Bush has been allowed to establish his spending priorities and the Congress has in effect abdicated their responsibility to set the spending. The most recent example is the S-CHIP funding which Congress passed in a bipartisan vote. Bush has vetoed that decision by Congress which is an abuse of his veto power. If Congress does not override this veto Bush and NOT Congress, as the Constitution Requires, will set the spending policy of our country. Once the majority of Congress chooses a spending level, they have a responsibility to insure that it is established and must override any Presidential veto to insure their constitutional responsibility is met.

What does our Constitution say about war? Our Founders divided war into two separate powers: Congress was given the power to declare war and the president was given the power to wage war. What that means is that under our system of government, the president cannot legally wage war against another nation in the absence of a declaration of war against that nation from Congress. When Congress passed the Iraq War Resolution they delegated that Constitutional power to declare war to the President. There is NO provision in our Constitution to delegate that power to the President. When Congress passed this clearly unconstitutional law, a case should have been initiated to challenge that Iraq War Resolution. No such action was undertaken and the third branch of our government, our courts, was unable to fulfill their constitutional responsibility to insure Congress and the President do not act outside the Constitution.

In both these examples George W. Bush violated his oath of office. Every time Congress does not insure their decision on the budget is enacted they fail their responsibility. The Iraq war resolution is a failure of first Congress then Bush and finally by the fact that a case was not brought to the Federal Courts to challenge the Iraq war Resolution. Technically the Courts did not violate their constitutional responsibility because they can only exercise that power WHEN a case has been initiated. Thus the fact that no case was brought to challenge the action of Congress to delegate a power only Congress can exercise was because no American choose to challenge the resolution in court. I for one believe that such a suit should be brought today to make it clear for the future that ONLY Congress has the power to declare war. Congress DID NOT declare war against Iraq. On December 8, 1941 Congress did not say to President Roosevelt he had the power to declare war against Japan, Germany or Italy. Congress DECLARED WAR and that enabled President Roosevelt to act under his power as Commander-in-Chief. That is NOT what took place in Iraq. Bush acted as both the Congress and as Commander-in-Chief.

We need to STOP the destruction of our Constitution by the President or Congress. The first step in that quest is to tell Congress they and not Bush need to set the spending of the United States. The second action is to bring a case that challenges the Iraq War Resolution which continues today to be the authority by which Bush continues the Iraq War. There is no greater danger then to allow the President or Congress to violate our Constitution!
30,917 views 121 replies
Reply #26 Top
This proves you live in a DREAM world!
<> Bush is not intelligent but has managed to get the help of some very intelligent people plus his father's contacts. He on his own has accomplished nothing of any worth!


So if he did nothing, why do you blame him for everything? Kinda funny how you try to come out as the smart one but always end up as a fart in the wind.

Take a look at the resume of GWB:

Poor Student Yale and Harvard
Drunk up to age 40
Probably used drugs while in military (reason he refused to take physical)
Poor Military Record
Formed two oil companies that both failed.
Mediocre performance as GM of the Texas Rangers.
No major accomplishments as Governor of Texas.
A presidency that is a complete disaster with the lowest approval ratings since Nixon.


LOL, the average American can full under most of this list, somewhat tweaked and still many have done great in life.

What were your accomplishments Col? Do yours stack up to him? I mean, after all, they guy did Become Governor, President, general manager and actually went to Yale and Harvard, even with not so great grades. He also owned Oil companies, even if he did a bad job running them. To me he has done more that most of us on this site. I would like to see a list of what you have accomplished.
Reply #27 Top
Oh, God - don't ask him that. He'll try to sell you his book.
Reply #28 Top
So if he did nothing, why do you blame him for everything? Kinda funny how you try to come out as the smart one but always end up as a fart in the wind.

A presidency that is a complete disaster with the lowest approval ratings since Nixon.

What were your accomplishments Col? Do yours stack up to him? I mean, after all, they guy did Become Governor, President, general manager and actually went to Yale and Harvard, even with not so great grades. He also owned Oil companies, even if he did a bad job running them. To me he has done more that most of us on this site. I would like to see a list of what you have accomplished.

My accomplishments were the result of MY efforts not because of the influence of my Father's Contacts. I earned my entry into Penn State and Lehigh University. I earned my commission as a Distinguished Military Graduate. I earned my way into the Army War College which is by invitation only. I performed in civilian life and was successful in every job I had with laudatory comments and evaluations. I was promoted through the ranks to Colonel in a total of 19 years and was nominated for a flag. All this because of my efforts not because it was handed to me like Bush. Bush got everything by the influence of his father and his father’s connections. The list of things Bush has screwed up as President is extensive-- Debt, Iraq, Trade, Immigration, Medicare etc. He has accomplished NOTHING as President! He has the lowest approval rating of any President other then Nixon after Watergate. Many of the people he appointed were political hacks that have failed the American people time after time. He selected Cheney who has the lowest approval rating I have ever scene. The last poll I saw as to his approval was 18%. Bush is a REAL WINNER. Anyone that supports him shows just how big a failure they are to support the likes of GWB!
Reply #29 Top
i hate to do this but for someone who had outstanding grades at the military school and wrote two anti bush books. you sure spell badly. and for me to say that it really means that you spell badly
Reply #30 Top
i hate to do this but for someone who had outstanding grades at the military school and wrote two anti bush books. you sure spell badly. and for me to say that it really means that you spell badly


PWNED!
Reply #31 Top
Looks like even Penn State, Lehigh & the AWC can make mistakes.
Reply #32 Top
Reply By: Daiwa Posted: Monday, October 08, 2007
Looks like even Penn State, Lehigh & the AWC can make mistakes. Better take another look. I earned what I achieved unlike Bush who had everything handed to him!
Reply #33 Top
Better take another look. I earned what I achieved unlike Bush who had everything handed to him!


who handed him the governership of texas or the presidency of the united states twice.
Reply #34 Top
Daddy, of course. And Clarence Thomas. That whole voting thing was just a charade.
Reply #35 Top
A presidency that is a complete disaster with the lowest approval ratings since Nixon.


But you just said it wasn't him? Make up your mind Col.
Reply #36 Top
Reply By: danielost Posted: Monday, October 08, 2007
“Better take another look. I earned what I achieved unlike Bush who had everything handed to him!


Who handed him the governorship of Texas or the presidency of the United States twice.” DADDY and Daddy’s contacts.


First no person with the record Bush had in the Military, College, Business would ever had the opportunity to run for any significant office had it not been for the influence of his father and his father's contacts. Bush had NO experience that warranted him being a Governor and certainly not President. If anyone else with the exact record as Bush but without the contacts would have attempted to run for governor or president they would have gotten NO WARE!

As to the 2000 election, Bush was NOT elected President. He received 500,000 fewer votes then Gore and because the confusing design in Palm Beach County FL ballot caused 3,500 votes not to be counted. This has NOTHING to do with the Supreme Court decision about a recount. It has to do with a ballot in one Fl County that confused voters and they double punched their ballots. Had that county used the same ballot design as the other 67 Fl Counties, those votes would have been counted and Bush would not have won FL. The issue is simple-- HAD the votes in Palm beach County been counted as voters intended, Bush would not have won Florida and would not be President!
Reply #37 Top
First no person with the record Bush had in the Military, College, Business would ever had the opportunity to run for any significant office had it not been for the influence of his father and his father's contacts.


wrong clinton was a draft dodger.
Reply #38 Top
As to the 2000 election, Bush was NOT elected President. He received 500,000 fewer votes then Gore


wrong this was true 6 months after the election after gore changed the rules on recounting the vote 13 times.
Reply #39 Top
because the confusing design in Palm Beach County FL ballot caused 3,500 votes not to be counted.


this was designed by the democrats because it wasn't confusing.
Reply #40 Top
and the ones who were really disenfrancized were the people living in the other half of florida.


you know the ones in the other time zone. who went home without voting because the media was telling everone that florida had already gone to al gore.
Reply #41 Top
as for the courts being brought in that was done by AL gore. he didn't want to follow the constitution, which states that all ties are broken by the senate, the reason is because the senate was controlled by the republicans. this vote is one of the few which is majority.
Reply #42 Top
Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 09, 2007
“First no person with the record Bush had in the Military, College, Business would ever have the opportunity to run for any significant office had it not been for the influence of his father and his father's contacts.


Wrong clinton was a draft dodger.”

Clinton was also and accomplished lawyer, a governor that did not become governor because of his daddy’s contacts and a brilliant student.


Yes Clinton and Cheney were BOTH draft doggers. Bush was worse. He got Daddy to get him a Commission he did not earn or deserve to keep his ass out of Vietnam. Then when the requirements of the military conflicted with what Bush wanted he disobeyed orders and regulations when he refused to take the required physical. That resulted in him being grounded and then he was given an honorable Discharge HE DID deserve.
Reply #43 Top




Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 09, 2007
As to the 2000 election, Bush was NOT elected President. He received 500,000 fewer votes then Gore


wrong this was true 6 months after the election after gore changed the rules on recounting the vote 13 times.

LIE At no time was Bush ahead of Gore in the total vote count!
Reply #44 Top
Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 09, 2007
As to the 2000 election, Bush was NOT elected President. He received 500,000 fewer votes then Gore


wrong this was true 6 months after the election after gore changed the rules on recounting the vote 13 times.

LIE At no time was Bush ahead of Gore in the total vote count!


Our presidents are not decided by popular vote, Col. They're decided by the ELECTORAL COLLEGE.

Too bad in all your schooling you never took a course in civics.
Reply #45 Top
Bush wanted he disobeyed orders and regulations when he refused to take the required physical.


this has been proven to be lies.
Reply #46 Top
al gore is also not the only one to get the popular vote and lose.
Reply #47 Top

Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 09, 2007
“because the confusing design in Palm Beach County FL ballot caused 3,500 votes not to be counted.


This was designed by the democrats because it wasn't confusing.”


It was designed by a democrat but it was confusing. Palm beach County was the ONLY County that used this design and the proportion of voided ballots was off the scale in Palm Beach compared will ALL other counties in FL. I live in FL and followed the election very closely. The ballot was a two page design and confusion was between Buchanan and Gore. BUCHANAN WAS THE FIRST NAME AND GORE THE SECOND NAME. Bush was third. The name was on the left and the punch was on the right. Voters in a highly democratic area punched their ballot expecting to cast a vote for Gore. There were surveys taken after the election and it was clear the democrat registered voters whose ballots were voided because of the double punch intended to vote for Gore. They discovered their error while in the voting booth and punched the ballot a second time intending to vote for Gore. 3,500 ballots in one small area populated with elderly Jewish democrats had their ballots invalidated because they were confused. There was never a question of these voters wanted to elect Bush and they did not intend to vote for Buchanan. That confusion and the subsequent double punch of 3,500 votes intended for Gore is the ONLY reason why Bush carried Florida and became President. If all the Votes in Palm Beach County were COUNTED AS THE VOTERS INTENDED, Bush would not have been declared the victor in Florida and would not have been elected President. This is what happened and no amount of BS from Bush supporters can change those facts.


Reply #48 Top
Reply | | Delete




Reply By: danielost Posted: Tuesday, October 09, 2007
al gore is also not the only one to get the popular vote and lose.

The issue is that Bush won IN Fl because of a error NOT BECAUSE HE REVEIVED THE MAJORITY OF THE VOTES IN FLORIDA!
Reply #49 Top
Another example of Gene's willful ignorance and monomania.

Our President is not elected on the basis of the number of votes received in the country. The Constitution has a little provision in it involving something called the Electoral College. There's also the litle matter of the judicial branch exercising its proper authority under the Constitution to settle the dispute in Florida.

For someone who squeals so loudly about adherence to our Constitution, you should know better, Gene, but you don't give a shit. You drag the Constitution into your arguments only when it suits you and ignore it when it when it conflicts with your prejudices.

Pretending that one county in one state decided the issue all by itself is ludicrous & conveniently ignores all the shenanigans going on in other close states where Bush lost by narrow margins.

But like I said, you don't give a shit about the truth, only your demented Bush Truth.

Reply #50 Top

Reply By: Daiwa Posted: Tuesday, October 09, 2007
“Another example of Gene's willful ignorance and monomania.

Our President is not elected on the basis of the number of votes received in the country. The Constitution has a little provision in it involving something called the Electoral College. There's also the little matter of the judicial branch exercising its proper authority under the Constitution to settle the dispute in Florida.”


YOU twist the truth. The issue is that if the 3,500 votes in Palm Beach Country had been counted as the voters intended the total Florida Vote Count would have given Gore Florida by 3,000 votes and he would won the electoral college votes from Florida. That would have given Gore the 2000 election and those are the facts! Because of an error, the votes of 3,500 people who voted for Gore were not counted and that allowed Bush to win Florida.

The issue of the voided votes in Palm Beach County has NOTHING to do with the Supreme Court ruling that ended the recount of votes in Florida. Those 3,500 voted were not part of the recount because they were voided due to the double punch which resulted from the confusion in the ballot design in that ONE Florida County. There should have been a special election just for president in Palm Beach County that would have allowed ONLY those that voted in the presidential election to cast their ballots so the WILL of the voters in that county were counted to determine who won the 2000 election in Florida. That would have given Florida to Gore by 3,000 votes!