Jews Say Enough Already

African nations won't unite to protest these attrocities because it might end up shedding light on the attrocities of their own.

Most African nations aren't run by governments, they are run by warlords.  Why should we expect them to act like governments?

"And why can’t the African nations unite and protest these atrocities?"

Para's reply and this:

The Sudanese government has not yet succeeded to make up a good explanation for how it is the Jews' or Israel's fault.

Once the genocide can be blamed on the Jews, there will be a world-wide outcry.

Why should we expect them to act like governments?

I agree and ditto for Afghanistan and Iraq. 

Once the genocide can be blamed on the Jews, there will be a world-wide outcry.

Interesting take.

I'll agree wiht your "ditto" on Afghanistan, but Iraq has a government that was elected by the people in a free election. It's not a matter of whether there is a government in Iraq as much as, will Iran, Syria and the Islamist terrorist groups leave them alone long enough to move forward?

For as long as its members insist that the UN are Peace Keepers, not Peace Enforcers. It needs more than BB guns to separate waring factions, and no major power in the UN is going to sanction forceful insertion of troops without some kind of peace accord in place on the ground - no matter how fragile that accord is. Its only happened once, Korea, and then only because the Russians abstained in the Security Council because they had their own problems with the Chinese.

The spectre of the UN becoming a world wide policeforce, acting as Peace Enforcers, separate from the checks and balances of National Governments, is too terrifying to contemplate. So with all its imperfections, Peace Keepers it is, no other structure would be endorsed by member states as a permanent institution.

Exactly Zydor! It would be much better to have pockets of attrocious actions around the world than grant any 1 organization the power and authority to try to quell them.

The UN has already proven it can't be trusted with even the terms of its charter. Nothing about their decisions thus far should give anyone reason to believe they will act any better if given MORE power.

Since Israel has a law that allows anyone (even a non-Jew) who had a jewish grandparent to emigrate and get citizenship. They have recently even had citizens who were found to be Neo-Nazis. I suspect that they are rethinking this policy to ensure that any future residents have a religious stake in the survival of their country.

It would be much better to have pockets of attrocious actions around the world than grant any 1 organization the power and authority to try to quell them.

  Like preemptive action by the US. I gather.

The spectre of the UN becoming a world wide policeforce, acting as Peace Enforcers, separate from the checks and balances of National Governments, is too terrifying to contemplate. So with all its imperfections, Peace Keepers it is, no other structure would be endorsed by member states as a permanent institution.

Well said!

they are rethinking this policy

as we should be doing by closing the borders and declaring a moratorium on immigration.

Like preemptive action by the US. I gather.

Yawn.  There was a ceasefire agreement between the US and Iraq, it was broken, it as finally enforced.

will Iran, Syria and the Islamist terrorist groups leave them alone long enough to move forward?

Good point; yet you can't lay all the blame on foreigners, including us.

There was a ceasefire agreement between the US and Iraq, it was broken, it as finally enforced

As I answered you before on another blog: it was not justification to commit ground troops.

funny Hitler and Stalin both would have qualified

Funny you should mention Stalin Daniel, the 8 neo-nazi scum were from the former Soviet union. They were stupid enough to videotape themselves giving nazi salutes and beating up old men, and vandalizing Synagogues. Their actual justification for emigration was fairly weak. What I wonder is how all of these kindred spirits found each other. Perhaps the lowest of scum slips to the bottom?

they are rethinking this policy

They definitely are; immigrants should be "true blooded" Jews.

Since the ceasefire agreement was broken, a return to the same level of hostilities that existed before the ceasefire was signed is completely legitimate. If a return to hostilities is not a legitimate option for a broken ceasefire, then the ceasefire has no value at all.

Or do you consider killing cleaning ladies in aspirin factories a more legitimate option?