Our Father, Who Art in Washington..

a ding-dong daddy from deecee

this is a totally subjective opinion and may or may not be correct: all things being equal, more voters will choose a republican over a democrat when voting in an election to fill an executive office.

this is a conclusion based on solely on personal observation but i think its accurate: successful republican candidates for executive positions like us president and governor of california seem to share an unusual common characteristic

it's a relatively recent phenomenon and very much like one of those 3d images that appear to be nothing but rows of multi-colored repetitive patterns until you stand very close to it, let your eyes go out of focus and then step backwards slowly without blinking. it seems to date back to an unusual convergence of life imitating art or vice versa in the mid-1970s.

gerald ford took office in late 1974. saturday night live debuted in fall 1975. a few weeks, maybe a month later, chevy chase became the first member of snl's ensemble cast to emerge as a star in his own right. chase's ticket to fame was an overly exaggerated impersonation of ford stumbling over his own feet. to the best of my knowledge, gerald ford had no previous history of public clumsiness--at least not while being videotaped by news crews. it was just a silly one-time thing until chase mimicked it on national television. then something truly weird happened. ford, who otherwise seemed as presidential as any of his predecessors, began to trip on nothing on a fairly regular basis. chase, who had to have been delighted, kept stumbling with him until ford lost the next election and chevy gained a movie contract..

things went back to normal--sort of--for the next four years. jimma carter who succeeded ford might have served two terms but there always seemed to be something lacking. at the time, i didnt realize what it was.

ronald reagan had no such problem. he capitalized on this elusive je-ne sais quois. george hw bush came by it naturally as well although its manifestation was a bit subtler. when george w bush began to attract national attention in 1999, i finally realized what id been seeing all along, but not been able to grasp.

after nearly 200 years of presidents with boringly presidential personae, american voters--following the lead of staunch republicans--now manifest an affinity for a leader who would be perfectly cast as the obliviously/defiantly moronic father of a sitcom family.

i know. at first consideration, it seems as if im taking a cheap shot. before you dismiss it that way, consider the following: ronald reagan frequently referred to his wife as 'mommy' and often appeared to need her help to interpret relatively simple questions; appeared had nothing to do with formulating answers. nancy clearly fed him responses just like the clever sitcom wife has always done. then there were the naps (a staple of dumb daddom dating back to dagwood bumstead). the ranch chores. those tall tales that merged movie roles with real life. hell, i could have stopped after 'mommy' by merely typing 'bedtime for bonzo'.

george hw bush? think dana carvey for starters. "naw gwa do" is as perfect and idiotically zen as homer simpson's 'doh' bush would have starved if hed had to sell shoes like al bundy...exactly as al bundy starved selling shoes. not convinced? who but a bona fide sitcom dad would have puked in someone's lap at an official state dinner?

just as the boy is the father to the man (or is that "do it once, shame on me; do it twice, shame on ummm me again"?), the current president bush has it down so well he often seems to doing an impersonation of chevy chase doing an impersonation of a caricature of a grinning goofy 'alf' dad. its something he clearly brought with him to the role of a lifetime. one need only glance casually at laura bush to imagine the hilarious hijinks she unleashed upon learning george had managed to get hisself locked up for drinking and driving. he's even managed to father his very own, real life olsen twins.

so where do republican california gubernatorial candidates fit into this? four words: bill simon arnold schwartzenegger. bill simon may have failed twice running for that office, but hes got the right stuff. if i were casting director for an upcoming season of 'full whitehouse' or '8 million is enough', i really couldnt say whether bill or george would get the part. arnold? admittedly hes only done the dumbo daddy in movies but i think we all know whos saving the family from his weekly schemes in real life, dont we?
11,208 views 31 replies
Reply #1 Top
perfectly cast as the obliviously/defiantly moronic father of a sitcom family.

The creators of Southpark aired a sitcom on comedy central dedicated to Bush called "That's MY Bush". Consequently it only aired 8 episodes before being yanked out. It seems you aren't the only one who sees this trend. There are Americans who vote for a candidate strictly on whether they look nice or not regardless of the issues they support. You can call me crazy but I have talked to people like that.
Reply #2 Top
was 'that's my bush' (hahaha whatta great title) also animated? i hadnt heard of it previously. call you crazy? nawww insightful seems more appropriate.
Reply #3 Top
I think you have taken a bit of peotic liscense to make the point but I agree. Bush et al, seem to be far more *accessable* to most Americans in contrast to the John Kerry's, Ted Kennedy's, and Hillary Clinton's of the world. It is not limited by Party though. Jimmy Carter managed it witht he "peanut farmer" bit and that jackasslike smile and so did President Clinton with the accent, smile, and philandering.
Reply #4 Top
It was actually live action with a Bush look-alike back even before 9-11. Another thing that I think is incredibly ridiculous is that hobby ranch he is always at, because you know he has taken more vacations than any other president ever. He wants to appeal to the public by trying to project an image of this down-to-earth Texan with aspirations to be a cowboy, or when he wore that flight suit even though he was never an Airforce or Navy pilot it's all so blatant that it's sad when I look to see people actually swallow this stuff up.
Reply #5 Top
Think yourselves lucky ...we have a thunderbird puppet as Prime Minister

Jess
Reply #6 Top
greywar...

the bush grin which he seems at times unable to control reminds me so much of chevy chase and tommy smothers..sorta sly and supercilious and inappropriately goofy.

kerry does have a certain patrician air but i wonder if it would appear that way to someone who had no knowledge of his backround. for some reason i see a resemblance between kerry and the andrew jackson etching on 20$ bills.
Reply #7 Top
that hobby ranch he is always at, because you know he has taken more vacations than any other president ever

if one were to concentrate solely bush and reagan in regard to the amount of time they spent not working or on their ranches, it would be easy to make the mistake of concluding ranching is the ultimate slacker occupation
Reply #8 Top
we have a thunderbird puppet as Prime Minister

ahahahahah

..at least yall dont have dick cheney in the background pulling his strings.
Reply #9 Top
Nah ..we have Bush

Jess
Reply #10 Top
touche!

Reply #11 Top
>> or when he wore that flight suit even though he was never an Airforce or Navy pilot

Bush is a licensed pilot, took basic training and air flight courses at Air Force bases, and served as a pilot in the National Guard (when he wasn't off somewhere getting stoned, of course). I believe some regulation required him to wear the flight suite that day (at least while he was on the plane ). That it played into the image he was trying to project is just icing on the cake.

So what are we saying here? The Republicans are better at projecting an image of what people want? That Republicans are more in tune with the desires of the people? That the Democrats are so convinced they are right they don't think posturing is necessary? Or that the Democrats can't project it because they don't have a clue what clicks with the average American? I.e. The Democrats are out of touch!

Reply #12 Top
my understanding is he was trained to fly an aircraft that was, at the time he was officially on active duty, obsolete (although im guessing the skills transfer fairly quickly).

makes sense about the flightsuit. im not sure id buy into a regulation requiring a huge banner tho.

if kerry was at all venal or even 1/10th as powermad as been suggested in other discussions, he would have long ago started using footage from the bush victory landing event in his ads. there wouldnt even be a need for text or voice over.
Reply #13 Top
>>if kerry was at all venal or even 1/10th as powermad as been suggested in other discussions,
>>he would have long ago started using footage from the bush victory landing event in his ads.
>> there wouldnt even be a need for text or voice over.

He actually did use it, back in February. (You can watch it here: http://www.johnkerry.com/videos/player.php?video=020604_nomrpres)

Does that make him venal and powermad? Hehehehe.

P.S. -- I'll give you and "insightful" just for using the word "venal."

Reply #14 Top
I seem to recall Michael Dukakis riding around in a tank in full gear during his campaign in 1988.
Reply #15 Top

Reply #16 Top
>>I seem to recall Michael Dukakis riding around in a tank in full gear during his campaign in 1988.

Frankly I thought Kerry playing hockey was just as ridiculous. One commentator I heard called Kerry on Ice "manly."
Reply #17 Top
smartaz...thanks for the link (i hadnt seen that previously) and for your insightful compliment

i wasnt as clear as i should have been. if kerry were as bla bla bla, bush would have qualified for some kind of record for the most successful carrier landings as well as most regretted publicity stunts involving a war
Reply #18 Top
after the last bla it shoulda said: that commercial would be running so frequently, bush would have etc etc

sorry i lost my head over the insightful rating hahahah
Reply #19 Top
I seem to recall Michael Dukakis riding around in a tank in full gear during his campaign in 1988

an regrettable (altho much more forgettable) decision. i truly cant recall WHY he was tanking around--he was scared of prematurely paroled felons?--but i know it wasnt to pronounce victory at halftime..
Reply #20 Top

was 'that's my bush' (hahaha whatta great title) also animated? i hadnt heard of it previously. call you crazy? nawww insightful seems more appropriate.

Funny... there's a re-run of "that's my Bush" playing on Comedy Central right now... It's incredibly stupid.  I wish that people had more respect for our President, whether they agree with him or not...

Reply #21 Top
hmmmm well thats a drag. it really is a funny title. they shoulda gave the gig to the guys who did b&b
Reply #22 Top
Anybody know the figures on reelections for democrat v. republican canidates? As a sidebar, the only president to serve more than two terms was a democrat.

17 presidents were democrats
18 presidents were republicans

10 democratic presidents served two or more terms
6 republican presidents served two terms

Historically speaking do people prefer Republicans over democrats? Well, it could be said that people prefer their initial impressions of republicans, but once in office prefer democrats. Or, it could be said, quite legitimately since a good number of the people were elected previous to the twentieth century, which is when, more or less, the modern views of the parties solidified, that people prefer the two parties equally well.

If you look at polling data, this conclusion is supported since roughly equal numbers of people say they for sure vote one way or another. Republicans do have a slight edge on party loyalty, but recent trends show that democrats are quite good at picking up the undecided.

What is all this trying to prove?

That it's foolish to say people definitely will vote one way or the other, or that because people like watching TV that people will vote republican. After all, the only reason Nixon lost to Kennedy was because Kennedy looked better on TV.

Cheers
Reply #23 Top
What is all this trying to prove?

while im appreciative that you gave this article such thoughtful consideration and expended the effort to determine the validity of my initial proposition, im concerned i may have been too subtle in its development, possibly misleading you in the process of slouching from sublime to somewhere down the road apiece.

Reply #24 Top
I appreciated the humor, it's just the darn professor in me that strives for historical accuracy.

Cheers
Reply #25 Top
strive on sir. i know you have a decent sense of humor. i was concerned perhaps id lost mine. or that youd immersed yourself a tad too long in mr cooleys uniquely unparallel universe