COL Gene COL Gene

GAO Report on Iraq BLEAK and at ODDS with White House!

GAO Report on Iraq BLEAK and at ODDS with White House!



On Tuesday Congress will receive the GAO Report on the situation in Iraq. The report is a detailed assessment of both the military and non military progress in Iraq. This report was requested by Congress and the person who released the 69 page draft copy to the Washington Post did so because they feared there would be an attempt by the White House to water down the very pessimistic GAO assessment on Iraq.


The report says that only 3 of the 18 Benchmarks have been met by the Iraqi Government. It also disagrees with earlier White House assessments on the military progress from the surge. The GAO report acknowledges that there has been a small reduction in attacks against American Forces and fewer attacks in certain areas but the overall killing and violence in Iraq has not changed. The report also says the effectiveness of the Iraqi Military has not improved and the government is unable to resolve the political issues. July saw the second highest number of deaths in Iraq since our invasion and the death rate in 2007 is twice as high as it was in 2006.

The GAO Report also questions if the Iraqi Government will follow through with the $10 Billion dollars of infrastructure repairs they committed to throughout the country. In a nut shell the GAO Report is a bleaker assessment on the progress, or lack of it, then any previous report. It is likely that this GAO assessment will be at odds with some of the Petraeus/Crocker report in mid September.
12,549 views 37 replies
Reply #26 Top
Our actions have increased the hate toward our country. In fact Cheney in his 1994 interview understood that invading Iraq was a mistake. It is remarkable how he lost his ability to reason when he became VP. You should look at the clip of that 1994 interview on You Tube!


That's purely propaganda and you know it.  The "hate" has been around long before Bush, and the worst attack on our country happened way before Iraq, or anything else Bush did.  So that theory is complete nonsense.

I saw the video, and I saw videos and text from the democrats who told me Iraq was a threat and we should remove him.  Too bad you are too one-sided to realize this.


Reply #27 Top
Reply By: danielost Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007
“Pentagon disputes parts of Iraq report


The Associated Press has learned that the GAO report was on track to conclude that at least 13 of the 18 benchmarks set to judge the Iraqi government's performance in the political and security arenas haven't been met.

We have provided the GAO with information which we believe will lead them to conclude that a few of the benchmark grades should be upgraded from `not met' to `met,'" Morrell said. He declined to elaborate or to spell out which of the benchmark grades the Pentagon was disputing.

In preparation for an expected decision next month on whether to prolong the U.S. troop buildup in Iraq, President Bush planned to visit the Pentagon on Friday to hear the views of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a Joint Chiefs spokesman said.

Maj. Gen. Richard Sherlock, director of operational planning for the Joint Chiefs, told reporters that this would be the Joint Chiefs' opportunity to "provide the president with their unvarnished recommendations and their assessment of current operations" -- in particular, the situation in Iraq.”

As I said I believe Gen Petraeus and Bush will point to a reduction in violence in the areas where we have increased our troop strength. They will also show a slight reduction in U.S. Losses in July and August. GAO acknowledged that but the overall situation of killing and violence and the lack of action by the Iraqi Government show that overall the situation is not improving. In addition, we have no way of knowing if the attacks will remain lower if we were to reduce our troop strength. Given the fact that many of the generals in Iraq argue not to cut the troop surge, they must believe the attacks will resume if we reduce our troop levels. That means we have NOT solved anything and the decreased violence will only continue so long as we remain in Iraq with large numbers of troops. The problem for Bush that come spring, we do not have the combat brigades to continue the Surge!!!!!

You don't know this you speculate this. Iran armed them, financed them and gave aid to them. If we had sent the 500,000 troops we would have been able to prevent Iran fron sending anything into Iraq.
Reply #28 Top
If we had sent the 500,000 troops we would have been able to prevent Iran fron sending anything into Iraq.


Yeah, right. It's amazing what you "know" when it can't be proven one way or the other. How convenient for you.
Reply #29 Top
Reply By: Daiwa Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007
If we had sent the 500,000 troops we would have been able to prevent Iran from sending anything into Iraq.


Yeah, right. It's amazing what you "know" when it can't be proven one way or the other. How convenient for you.

Every Military Leader has acknowledged we did not send the troop levels needed in Iraq. The planners and most generals told Bush it took far more troops to control Iraq then he sent into Iraq. We did not stop foreign terrorists from coming into Iraq. We did not occupy the cities where the militia and sectarian groups organized. We did not prevent the factions from using the Ammo stored in over 200 locations in Iraq. We did not protect the infrastructure. WHY - Because we did not send the troops required. WHY Because Bush did not listen to the military experts.
Reply #30 Top
There's no point people, Col just keeps going in circles using answers he's already used and has been contradicted already. There is no point, he just repeats and repeats.
Reply #31 Top
Bush did not listen to the military experts.


and now you are not listening to military experts.
Reply #32 Top

Reply By: danielost Posted: Thursday, August 30, 2007
Bush did not listen to the military experts.


and now you are not listening to military experts.


I have acknowledged that the GAO has said that in SOME areas the military situation is better. However, overall the death rate is not lower and there is NO progress on the Political issues. Thus the Bush policy is not solving the problem of stability in Iraq!
Reply #33 Top
the GAO


these guys are not military experts. there may be military experts in the group. but the group is not a military expert. they work for congress. remind me who is charge of congress right now.
Reply #34 Top
Reply By: danielost Posted: Friday, August 31, 2007
“The GAO


These guys are not military experts. There may be military experts in the group. But the group is not a military expert. They work for congress. Remind me who is charge of congress right now.”


The GAO is non partisan. They issued reports when the GOP was in Control of Congress that was critical of our actions in Iraq such as the Billions that can not be accounted for that we spent. They are the premier investigative agency and unlike the Pentagon that is tied to the President's Policies, GAO is independent. The Controller General is appointed for 12 year terms and Bush can not demand his resignation! Try again—Their Report is creditable and shows the overall picture in Iraq which is that the Bush Policies have not and are not working!
Reply #35 Top
and now you are not listening to military experts.


Don't get me wrong daniel but you don't listen very well either Here, I'll quote myself here.

There's no point people, Col just keeps going in circles using answers he's already used and has been contradicted already. There is no point, he just repeats and repeats.


Reply #36 Top
More problems for the Bush Iraq Policy:

Bush to hear military concerns Friday about heavy troop deployments in Iraq
August 31, 2007 7:27 AM EDT
WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush is expected to hear deep concerns Friday from top Pentagon generals about continuing the military buildup in Iraq, as yet another grim independent report emerges finding lack of progress in the conflict.

Iraq was to be the main topic at a meeting so Bush could hear assessments from the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

Two independent assessments already have been previewed this week - the latest finding that Iraq's national police are so corrupt and tainted by sectarianism that the corps should be scrapped and replaced with a smaller force.

An independent commission established by Congress to study Iraq's security forces will recommend starting over and reshaping the troubled 25,000-member police organization with a more elite force, a defense official said Friday.

The report from a commission headed by the former commander of U.S. troops in Europe, retired Gen. James Jones, is to be presented to Congress next week but was briefed to Gates and other officials this week, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because it has not been publicly released.

It followed circulation of a draft report by the auditing arm of Congress that found the Iraqi government has failed to meet political and security goals. A third report - by the nation's intelligence agencies last week - found there has been some progress, but that violence remains high, the Iraqi government will become more precarious over the next six to 12 months and its security forces have not improved enough to operate without outside help.

Training and equipping an Iraqi Army, police force and border corps is key to handing over responsibility for Iraq's security and bringing U.S. troops home. Commanders have said they hoped to have a 390,000 security forces trained by the end of this year, but that they are not yet capable enough in some areas for the U.S. to reduce its troop levels.

Bush's Friday meeting with generals is likely to include an assessment on the long-term impact on U.S. forces of maintaining a heavy troop presence in Iraq in 2008 and beyond. There are more than 160,000 Americans in Iraq, up from around 130,000 before the escalation Bush ordered in January.

The Army and the Marine Corps have shouldered most of the burden in Iraq, creating strains that service leaders fear could hurt their recruiting as well as their preparedness for other military emergencies. The Joint Chiefs, however, were not expected to urge Bush to withdraw from Iraq entirely as many Democrats want.

Maj. Gen. Richard Sherlock, director of operational planning for the Joint Chiefs, told reporters that Friday's meeting in a secure conference room known as "the tank" would be the Joint Chiefs' opportunity to "provide the president with their unvarnished recommendations and their assessments of current operations" - in particular the situation in Iraq.

It did not appear that the session was intended to work out a consensus military view on how long Bush should maintain the U.S. troop buildup in Iraq or how soon to transition to Iraqi control of security.

Bush in recent public statements has suggested he intends to stick to his Iraq strategy for now.

Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell said this week that Gates wanted to ensure that all senior military leaders had an opportunity to express their individual views on Iraq to the president, without feeling the need to present a consensus view.

Bush was to hear advice from Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs; Adm. William Fallon, the senior commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East; and the top commanders in Baghdad.

The Pentagon meeting takes place as an independent assessment of the war from the Government Accountability Office has concluded that Iraq has made little political progress in recent months despite the influx of U.S. troops the president ordered earlier this year.

In a draft report circulated this week, the GAO concluded that at least 13 of the 18 political and security goals for the Iraqi government have not been met. Administration officials on Thursday objected to several of the findings and dismissed the report as unrealistically harsh because it assigned pass-or-fail grades to each benchmark, with little nuance.

Officials also appeared to dismiss the separate report on Iraqi security forces Friday.

"We're not giving up on the Iraqi National Police," said Morrell.

"We have said all along that the Army is growing into a very professional, dedicated force and that there is still work to be done with the police," said Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman.

Jones briefs Congress next week on his assessment of the Iraqi security forces, and Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, and Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, testify the week of Sept. 10.

Bush will deliver his own progress report by Sept. 15. This will be the one that the Bush SPIN DOCTORS write!
Reply #37 Top
The death figures were released in Iraq and they show that they are up since July. The violence overall in Iraq is getting worse despite the Surge! The figures did show some drop in the Baghdad area but an increase in other areas and an overall increase in deaths in Iraq since July of 20%. There is a SURGE in the number of dead in Iraq!