We Need A Liberal President

I think this country needs to elect a Liberal President.

Yes, it would mean tax increases and most likely would mean rampant government spending.

Yes, it would result in an increased Nanny State.

Yes, it would probably wreck our economy.

Yes, it would likely mean political correctness run amok.

Yes, it would probably mean that we would drop our defenses and allow terrorists free reign on our soil.

Yes, it would probably mean illegal aliens would gain a preferred status in this country.

But after four years of this bullshit maybe, just maybe the people would become so tired and outraged over it that the whole PC Nanny State mentality would finally be rejected once and for all.

What do you think? Let's elect a Liberal President in '08!

The preceding has been brought to you by the National Sarcasm Society. Yeah, like we need your support.
10,572 views 20 replies
Reply #1 Top
Kinda like how Bush & Co. has convinced everyone how fucked up and UN-conservative the Conservatives are?
Reply #2 Top
Kinda like how Bush & Co. has convinced everyone how fucked up and UN-conservative the Conservatives are?


Or not.
Reply #3 Top
You like the status quo? Seriously, you're satisfied with the government we have now? You think Bush has done an excellent job?
Reply #4 Top
You like the status quo?


Last I checked Bush won't be running in '08.
Reply #5 Top
Conservatives will be. Do you like the way our CONSERVATIVE President has governed?
Reply #6 Top
Conservatives will be.


Different ones, sure.

Do you like the way our CONSERVATIVE President has governed?


Depends upon what aspects. Do I like the fact we're at war? No, that would be quite insane. Do I like the fact that we've beefed up security? Certainly. Do I like the fact that we have a strong, healthy economy? Certainly. Do I like the fact that tax cuts increased Federal revenues? Certainly.

Do I enjoy writing sarcastic articles? Absolutely.
Reply #7 Top

I like the fact that we have a strong, healthy economy
Slow down, fella, this may not be for long. Investors have the jitters.

 

Reply #8 Top
Yes, it would mean tax increases and most likely would mean rampant government spending.

True, like repairing bridges, schools--perhaps finally New Orleans.

I'm surprised Texaii even bothers to comment.

Reply #9 Top
Reply #10 Top

I like the fact that we have a strong, healthy economy
Slow down, fella, this may not be for long. Investors have the jitters.

 



Investors always have the jitters about something or other, the market goes up and the market goes down. The overall economy is good and has been for some time.
Reply #11 Top
I'm surprised Texaii even bothers to comment.


You must surprise easily.
Reply #12 Top


Yep.

The article was a sarcastic, tongue in cheek poke at those with extreme political views, on both sides. Perhaps the humor is too subtle? I thought the last two sentences would be a dead give away. Ah well, humor is tough. Sometimes ya hit a home run, sometimes ya strike out.
Reply #13 Top
My wife voiced a similar comment the other night, actually. She said that it would, once and for all, call their collective bluff on how poorly the Republicans have performed and how much better they can do. Their claims of superiority would be given a chance and, after four years of sheer hellish socialism, we'd finally be rid of the modern Democratic party.
Reply #14 Top
The preceding has been brought to you by the National Sarcasm Society. Yeah, like we need your support.


HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Reply #15 Top

Investors always have the jitters about something or other, the market goes up and the market goes down. The overall economy is good and has been for some time.

Liberal rule number 33.  Markets only go up when liberals are in charge, and only go down when Conservatives are.  Any deviation from this rule is due to the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

Rule 33 Corollary - Substitute Economy for Markets in previous statement.

Reply #16 Top
Vast Right Wing Conspiracy


I always find this hilarious as neither side could possibly get their shit together well enough to actually carry out the trash let alone a vast conspiracy.
Reply #17 Top
We need a Liberal President like I need a frontal Lobotomy.

It can be argued I need it but who wants to go there?
Reply #18 Top
We need a Liberal President like I need a frontal Lobotomy.

It can be argued I need it but who wants to go there?


Probably a good thing you added that second sentence
Reply #19 Top
Yes the more liberal the better, who needs all this G-d stuff anyways? let there be public displays in schools of homosexuality, Give the Muslims their own prayer rooms and foot baths, but make the Christians take off their crosses in schools because it upsets the vampires, no more garlic either, same reason. Change Genesis to read Adam and Steve, enough with this sexist Adam and Eve bullshit. Drugs for everyone!. the taxes alone for the drugs will help the nations debt. Every School should have a drug room for study hall, where the kids can safely shoot up heroin under supervision, using clean needles. All future paychecks will have an extra 10% bum tax taken out to help the less fortunate, We need to reduce the size of the military, no more of this 15 month tour stuff, you rotate in for one day and rotate back out for 11 years. All firearms must be turned in to the BATF, under penalty of death. Only Liberals will be allowed to have guns and oh yeh criminals.
Reply #20 Top
I always find this hilarious as neither side could possibly get their shit together well enough to actually carry out the trash let alone a vast conspiracy.


Kind of like calling Bush a moron in one breath, and then blaming him for the 9-11 conspiracy in the next.