Moderateman Moderateman

Lying Liberals Busted

Lying Liberals Busted

An Article by Sweet Ann Coulter

In their latest demonstration of how much they love the troops, liberals have produced yet another anti-war hoax.

The New Republic has been running "true war" stories from a brave, anonymous liberal penning dispatches from Iraq. The famed "Baghdad Diarist" described his comrades joyfully using Bradley fighting vehicles to crush stray dogs, mocking a female whose face had been blown off by an IED, and defacing Iraqi corpses by wearing skull parts on their own heads.

Various conservatives began questioning the plausibility of the anonymous diarist's account -- noting, for example, that Bradley vehicles don't "swerve," as the diarist claimed. The editor of The New Republic responded by attacking the skeptics' motives, complaining that some conservatives make "a living denying any bad news that emanates from Iraq."
But when that clever retort failed to quiet rumblings from the right wing, The New Republic finally revealed the "Baghdad Diarist" to be ... John Kerry! Actually it was Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp, Democratic candidate for president circa 2028. (That gives him 20 years to learn to pronounce "Genghis.")

In revealing himself two weeks ago, Beauchamp lashed out at "people who have never served in Iraq." He said he was too busy fighting "an actual war" to participate in "an ideological battle that I never wanted to join."

He had tried to stay out of ideological battles by writing made-up articles in a national magazine claiming soldiers in Iraq had become callous beasts because of George Bush's war, killing to "secure the riches of the empire." Alas, this proved an ineffective method of keeping his head low. Beauchamp's next bid for privacy will be an attempt to host "The Price Is Right."

In response to Beauchamp's revelation that he was the "Baghdad Diarist," the military opened an investigation into his allegations. There was no corroboration for his stories, and Beauchamp promptly signed an affidavit admitting that every single thing he wrote in The New Republic was a lie.
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
According to The Weekly Standard's Michael Goldfarb -- who has led the charge of those who "make a living denying any bad news that emanates from Iraq" -- Maj. Steven F. Lamb, the deputy public affairs officer for Multi-National Division-Baghdad, said this of the Baghdad diarist:

"An investigation has been completed and the allegations made by Pvt. Beauchamp were found to be false. His platoon and company were interviewed and no one could substantiate the claims."

In response, The New Republic went into full Dan Rather loon mode. This astonishing post showed up on The New Republic Web site on Tuesday afternoon:

"A STATEMENT ON SCOTT THOMAS BEAUCHAMP:

"We've talked to military personnel directly involved in the events that Scott Thomas Beauchamp described, and they corroborated his account as detailed in our statement. When we called Army spokesman Maj. Steven F. Lamb and asked about an anonymously sourced allegation that Beauchamp had recanted his articles in a sworn statement, he told us, 'I have no knowledge of that.' He added, 'If someone is speaking anonymously (to The Weekly Standard), they are on their own.' When we pressed Lamb for details on the Army investigation, he told us, 'We don't go into the details of how we conduct our investigations.' -- The Editors"

It's good to see Mary Mapes is working again.

What on earth is going on? Either the military investigation found that Beauchamp lied or it didn't. Either military personnel corroborated stories of soldiers wearing skulls as crowns or they didn't. Either Army spokesman Maj. Steven Lamb gave a statement to The Weekly Standard or he didn't.

At the same time as The New Republic was posting the above statement, which completely contradicted The Weekly Standard's update, renowned right-wing news outlet ABC News confirmed that the military has concluded that Beauchamp was writing "fiction." ABC also quoted Goldfarb's account and said that Maj. Lamb reiterated his statement that Beauchamp's stories were false to ABC. The New York Times had the same story on Wednesday.

The New Republic has gone mad. Perhaps the magazine brought its former employee, fantasist Steven Glass, out of retirement. It's long past time for The New Republic to file for intellectual Chapter 7. Arthur Andersen was implicated in fewer frauds.

And we wonder how Democratic congressmen can lie about a vote they lost on the floor of the House -- captured on CSPAN for all the world to see -- changing the vote so that they win.

America's imminent victory in Iraq and safety from terrorist attacks at home is driving them all crazy.
"
39,498 views 151 replies
Reply #101 Top
geeeze about time you showed up docM and with some brillant facts too. thanks.


His post just touched a "very" sore spot with me. If it had been up to me, John Kerry would have been stood against a wall at dawn and shot by a firing squad!

To hear that treasonous SOB described as a "hero", PISSED me off!


LOL your a piece of shit you know that? No one deserves to be put up against a wall and shot by a firing squad! I would honestly like to know what this man has done to make you feel this way and I'm sure he has done no worse then allot of the people at the head of our government right now. How do you know what has been said about John Kerry is true or not? He was up against Bush and I would not trust any type of background information that came out on him because of that. How much proof do you actually have and is it any better then the documentation etc. that there is on these "conspiracy theories" on 9/11? Maybe you are just as gullible as any of us liberals? I think you all are! You eat up everything they feed you with no questions asked! If there is documentation how can you be sure of it's authenticity? One thing can be stated by one powerful and trusted person and be spread like a freaking wild fire with no questions asked. Documentation could be developed and set in place and if anything is uncovered the theory would be considered crazy. Logic is a threat is this nation now! If there's something the government wants it will crush everything in it's path and do what they can to make it look right and if it's questioned then the person with the questions is considered to be a "loon". It's so easy for them to cover up anything they want because of this. Why do you think Americans have the right to bear arms? The law was put in place just in case someone was to try to destroy the constitution and so the people would have power over the government because that was the way it was suppose to be! Now if anyone even questions the government then they are considered crazy, an anarchist, mentally challenged hippie protester!
Reply #102 Top
Jacob: I don't know who you think you are, but you certainly have NO RIGHT to call drmiler a piece of shit.

The problems a lot of folks on here have with John Kerry have to do with things they lived through and experienced or saw with their own eyes. It's all well-documented and accepted as fact. It's not hidden whatsoever.

You seem very young. Maybe study a little bit and then come back. And try to be a bit more respectful while you're at it.
Reply #103 Top
Continued from my reply above....

They are pretty much thrown out of society. Us liberals are just looking out for the best interest of this country and it's people and I do not understand why you people can not see that! It's like there's a war between the "right" and the "left" if fully analyzed which is the best half? Let me post the definition of a liberal once more:

- broad: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; "a broad political stance"; "generous and broad sympathies"; "a liberal newspaper"; "tolerant of his opponent's opinions"

- having political or social views favoring reform and progress

- tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition

- a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties

- big: given or giving freely; "was a big tipper"; "the bounteous goodness of God"; "bountiful compliments"; "a freehanded host"; "a handsome allowance"; "Saturday's child is loving and giving"; "a liberal backer of the arts"; "a munificent gift"; "her fond and openhanded grandfather"

Liberal sounds pretty damn good to me. I think I'm going to fight for the good not the evil.
Reply #104 Top
Let me post the definition of a liberal once more:


Problem is a textbook definition doesn't equal reality. Communism sounds good to some people on paper, but it really doesn't work out well in practice does it?


Reply #105 Top
JacobKerrAugust 17, 2007 02:56:32


- broad: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; "a broad political stance"; "generous and broad sympathies"; "a liberal newspaper"; "tolerant of his opponent's opinions"

- having political or social views favoring reform and progress

- tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition

- a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties

- big: given or giving freely; "was a big tipper"; "the bounteous goodness of God"; "bountiful compliments"; "a freehanded host"; "a handsome allowance"; "Saturday's child is loving and giving"; "a liberal backer of the arts"; "a munificent gift"; "her fond and openhanded grandfather"

Liberal sounds pretty damn good to me. I think I'm going to fight for the good not the evil.


what you just described sounds much to me like the old liberals, in the JFK mold, not today's politically correct, secular progressive {gag} pieces of shit that think they know what is better for everyone, today's liberal thinks nothing of the Murder of 20 million human fetuses but cries if a terrorists rights are violated. Today's liberals are the most full of shit motherfuckers on the planet.
Reply #106 Top
(Citizen)So Daiho HilbertAugust 16, 2007 19:27:48


drmiller, thank you for that link. I read it with interest. It would appear Kerry violated the law, yet I think your reply is a tad over the top. Like this one:

In the greater scheme of things I am not sure why you would think someone should be shot for seeking peace. Recent experience suggests Conservatives tend to go for this solution. First, don't talk to your enemies. Second, claim those who do are useless or traitors. Third, have a war. Fourth, invite every one's kiddos. Fifth, make sure your son or daughter doesn't enlist. Oh, well, let's just string 'em all up. I admit, I felt the same way about GW, that draft dodging silver spooner. So, maybe you're right. Lets go shoot 'em all.


While I have learned through experience that war really sucks and NO ONE wins really, what Hanoijohn did while our men were still fighting should have been considered treason, because he was still an officer in the USN, Notice I have never once questioned his actions while in combat, never once questioned his medals, I have even went as far to say hooraa that he chose to serve when he could have ducked out in a different article. On the other hand you keep calling Bush a draft dodger, where do you get this from? he served and was discharged with an honerable discharge.
Reply #107 Top
Today's liberals are the most full of shit motherfuckers on the planet.


So much for the moderate of Moderateman. An advocate of the Middle Way, I have trouble with extremes, with a lack of compassion, with a lack of perspective, and a lack of forgiveness. These are qualities of moderation and they require work as well as a commitment to practice them. Shooting our opponents, referring to them as sacks of fecal matter is hardly moderate. Perhaps you might consider another handle? Severeman? Extrememan? I don't know. I've never quite understood the need for such aliases anyway.

Be well.
Reply #108 Top
Bush a draft dodger, where do you get this from? he served and was discharged with an honerable discharge.


There was only one reason Mr. Bush joined the weekend warrior program during a war in my opinion, though I clearly could be wrong, and that was to avoid the draft and avoid Vietnam. You would call *that* service?

Today's Guard and Reserves are being sorely tested, but back then? He just didn't want to go. I will say, however, that avoiding the draft is not a bad thing. Lots of people did alternative service. But Mr. Bush is a gung-ho war wager now that he's president. Hard to respect that. But then, what do I know? Nothing.

See ya.

Reply #109 Top
the united states government has never executed anybody for treason.
Reply #110 Top

Reply By: SodaihoPosted: Friday, August 17, 2007
Today's liberals are the most full of shit motherfuckers on the planet.


So much for the moderate of Moderateman. An advocate of the Middle Way, I have trouble with extremes, with a lack of compassion, with a lack of perspective, and a lack of forgiveness. These are qualities of moderation and they require work as well as a commitment to practice them. Shooting our opponents, referring to them as sacks of fecal matter is hardly moderate. Perhaps you might consider another handle? Severeman? Extrememan? I don't know. I've never quite understood the need for such aliases anyway.

Be well.

ya see this is how it works Jacob attacked a friend of mine, Doc M calling him exactly what I called Jacob, I call it defending a friend.

BTW I can care less about your opinion of me, you don' t know me and for someone that claims to be a buddahead, you fall far short of any buddahead standard I have seen, but it was not my job to point it out till YOU decided to take MY inventory,. Besides that particular retort is old, old old, the "suggestion that I change my name." booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnggggggggggggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply #111 Top

Reply By: SodaihoPosted: Friday, August 17, 2007
Bush a draft dodger, where do you get this from? he served and was discharged with an honerable discharge.


There was only one reason Mr. Bush joined the weekend warrior program during a war in my opinion, though I clearly could be wrong, and that was to avoid the draft and avoid Vietnam. You would call *that* service?
draft dodgers left the country for the most part. Buncha cowards.

yes you could call it service, because it does indeed finish the required military obligation. Not everyone is as gung ho as I was and enlisted so I could "save my country" HA! 17 and stupid is what I was, but the ironic thing is if they called up this 61 year old ill tired old warrior to serve his country again, I would go.

Reply #112 Top
There was only one reason Mr. Bush joined the weekend warrior program during a war in my opinion, though I clearly could be wrong, and that was to avoid the draft and avoid Vietnam. You would call *that* service?



well this is slightly better than being 1 a draft dodger. and 2 giving aid and comfort to the enemy. as another president did.
Reply #113 Top
BTW I can care less about your opinion of me, you don' t know me and for someone that claims to be a buddahead, you fall far short of any buddahead standard I have seen, but it was not my job to point it out till YOU decided to take MY inventory,. Besides that particular retort is old, old old, the "suggestion that I change my name."


MM, why such hostility? Its important on such lists that we not read into posts too much emotion. I was simply saying what I thiought moderation included. You were a bit over the top, in my opinion, regardless of what you think of it. As far as Buddhists are concerned, you either haven't been around many or the sort you have been around are Theravaden. Zen Buddhists, especially us priests, are a wicked sort, as quick to slap a student with our kyosakus as smile. I actually think your name is interesting relative t o your politics.

See ya!
Reply #114 Top

I decided that you guys are way to closed minded to at least consider anything I have to say.

You have not said anything that is even remotely intelligent or not from the kooks handbook.  perhaps that is just your own disability.

Reply #115 Top

I decided that you guys are way to closed minded to at least consider anything I have to say.

You have not said anything that is even remotely intelligent or not from the kooks handbook.  perhaps that is just your own disability.

Reply #116 Top

Reply By: SodaihoPosted: Saturday, August 18, 2007
BTW I can care less about your opinion of me, you don' t know me and for someone that claims to be a buddahead, you fall far short of any buddahead standard I have seen, but it was not my job to point it out till YOU decided to take MY inventory,. Besides that particular retort is old, old old, the "suggestion that I change my name."


MM, why such hostility? Its important on such lists that we not read into posts too much emotion. I was simply saying what I thiought moderation included. You were a bit over the top, in my opinion, regardless of what you think of it. As far as Buddhists are concerned, you either haven't been around many or the sort you have been around are Theravaden. Zen Buddhists, especially us priests, are a wicked sort, as quick to slap a student with our kyosakus as smile. I actually think your name is interesting relative t o your politics.

hmmmmmmmmmm what made you think I was being hostile? if my truth is to much for you to bear, you need to practice some deeper breathing, all I said was your suggestion that I should change my name was very old and boring. If you interpret this as hostility, you need to check in with yourself and see that the only hostility here must be coming from inside of yourself.

Reply #117 Top
(Citizen)little-whipAugust 19, 2007 04:53:23


thatwasaprettyfunnyansweryougavewhipbuttruthfullytheuseofpunctuationwasabitconfusingandreallymadetheentirepresentationmuchlongerthanitshouldhavebeen.
Reply #118 Top
Moderateman, when a person says to you, "I could care less what you think" there is usually (though I am sure, not always) a hostile undercurrent, don't you think?

Moreover, your use of "buddhahead" was a tad insulting and hostile.

See ya.
Reply #119 Top
JacobKerrAugust 17, 2007 02:56:32


- broad: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; "a broad political stance"; "generous and broad sympathies"; "a liberal newspaper"; "tolerant of his opponent's opinions"

- having political or social views favoring reform and progress

- tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition

- a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties

- big: given or giving freely; "was a big tipper"; "the bounteous goodness of God"; "bountiful compliments"; "a freehanded host"; "a handsome allowance"; "Saturday's child is loving and giving"; "a liberal backer of the arts"; "a munificent gift"; "her fond and openhanded grandfather"

Liberal sounds pretty damn good to me. I think I'm going to fight for the good not the evil.


what you just described sounds much to me like the old liberals, in the JFK mold, not today's politically correct, secular progressive {gag} pieces of shit that think they know what is better for everyone, today's liberal thinks nothing of the Murder of 20 million human fetuses but cries if a terrorists rights are violated. Today's liberals are the most full of shit motherfuckers on the planet.


JacobKerrAugust 17, 2007 02:56:32


- broad: showing or characterized by broad-mindedness; "a broad political stance"; "generous and broad sympathies"; "a liberal newspaper"; "tolerant of his opponent's opinions"

- having political or social views favoring reform and progress

- tolerant of change; not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or tradition

- a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties

- big: given or giving freely; "was a big tipper"; "the bounteous goodness of God"; "bountiful compliments"; "a freehanded host"; "a handsome allowance"; "Saturday's child is loving and giving"; "a liberal backer of the arts"; "a munificent gift"; "her fond and openhanded grandfather"

Liberal sounds pretty damn good to me. I think I'm going to fight for the good not the evil.


what you just described sounds much to me like the old liberals, in the JFK mold, not today's politically correct, secular progressive {gag} pieces of shit that think they know what is better for everyone, today's liberal thinks nothing of the Murder of 20 million human fetuses but cries if a terrorists rights are violated. Today's liberals are the most full of shit motherfuckers on the planet.


The fact is most of the are not terrorist and most Americans are gullible and believe everything they tell you. I think your "full of shit"!
Reply #120 Top
the united states government has never executed anybody for treason.


Hahahaha... You have got to be kidding me! The United States have executed a countless amount of people for "treason" and they have many many definitions for treason.
Reply #121 Top
Moderateman, when a person says to you, "I could care less what you think" there is usually (though I am sure, not always) a hostile undercurrent, don't you think?


Actually when a person says they could care less what you think, it seems a solicitation for the other person to say what they think.

For, you see, saying you "could care less" implies there is at least one degree of caring below that which you are currently experiencing. And since you went out of your way to mention it, there are probably MULTIPLE levels of caring below that which you are currently experiencing. And thus, you actually care. The questionable part is to what degree.

Now, saying you "couldn't care less", on the other hand, would state that your caring had reached the rock bottom, the absolute zero, if you will, of caring, and that there is no caring left in your tank.

(walks away, with a wicked grin!)
Reply #122 Top
Hahahaha... You have got to be kidding me! The United States have executed a countless amount of people for "treason" and they have many many definitions for treason.


no the government hasn't

south carolina has

and i believe the army has.
Reply #123 Top
LOL your a piece of shit you know that? No one deserves to be put up against a wall and shot by a firing squad! I would honestly like to know what this man has done to make you feel this way and I'm sure he has done no worse then allot of the people at the head of our government right now. How do you know what has been said about John Kerry is true or not? He was up against Bush and I would not trust any type of background information that came out on him because of that. How much proof do you actually have and is it any better then the documentation etc. that there is on these "conspiracy theories" on 9/11? Maybe you are just as gullible as any of us liberals? I think you all are! You eat up everything they feed you with no questions asked! If there is documentation how can you be sure of it's authenticity? One thing can be stated by one powerful and trusted person and be spread like a freaking wild fire with no questions asked. Documentation could be developed and set in place and if anything is uncovered the theory would be considered crazy. Logic is a threat is this nation now! If there's something the government wants it will crush everything in it's path and do what they can to make it look right and if it's questioned then the person with the questions is considered to be a "loon". It's so easy for them to cover up anything they want because of this. Why do you think Americans have the right to bear arms? The law was put in place just in case someone was to try to destroy the constitution and so the people would have power over the government because that was the way it was suppose to be! Now if anyone even questions the government then they are considered crazy, an anarchist, mentally challenged hippie protester!



Social Security reform, indeed. Say no to guns and fear. It's like 1935 all over again. Of course, I am not one of Paul Wolfowitz's fan club of heartless puppets. John Ashcroft is a tool of the Treasury Department. Down with profits and imperialism. You really should read the book "Dreaming of the Ecosystem in Florida," by Cindy Sheehan. It changed my life. You just don't get it, do you. As a uninsured nudist, you see I am weird. What about embryonic research? What about Kyoto? What about humanities grants and dental insurance for the many disabled students who are denied in Tel Aviv every single day by our Liar-in-Chief and his glee club of carnivorous hired guns? Power to the agnostics. Wouldn't you agree, Smirk caused hurricane Katrina by drugging the Palestinian species in Ottawa. I reject envy and fascism. We've seen this before, in 1988 in Quebec, when 32,782 liberal Latinos were ignored by the Heritage Foundation. Chimpboy lied about that too. (Or is that supposed to be a secret?) Did I miss something? Down with fear!!!!!! THE VATICAN can SHOOT 55,288 DEMOCRATIC DEMOCRATS in HAVANA, ALL in the name OF "MORALITY"? Why DIDN'T you say SO, that MAKES it OKAY, THEN!!! (I AM BEING SARCASTIC!!!!) THE SMIRKING chimp's WAR AGAINST THE OZONE LAYER MUST END now!!!!!! The TRUTH is at OUTSOURCEDPRISONERSOFWARFORPURERIVERS.org!!! We've seen THIS BEFORE, IN 1987 in MICHIGAN, WHEN HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of CANADIAN CANADIANS were HYPNOTIZED by THE IVORY INDUSTRY!!!! (OR is that a SECRET!!!?) I REJECT SLIME AND POLLUTION!!! ACTUALLY, ROSIE O'DONNELL'S BOOK, "SOPHISTIC: HOW THE ANTI-ABORTION LOBBY CONTROLS THE LIKUD PARTY," SHOULD BE REQUIRED READING FOR RECIDIVISTS LIKE YOU!!!!!!! I AM SORRY FOR YOU, I REALLY AM!!!!!!!! WHAT ABOUT REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS!!!!!? WHAT ABOUT PURE RIVERS!!! WHAT ABOUT OUTREACH EFFORTS AND POLLUTANT-FREE AIR FOR THE 26,758 FEMINIST AGNOSTICS WHO ARE DEBASED IN OKLAHOMA CITY EVERY SINGLE DAY BY OUR HIGH PRIEST AND HIS MOB OF CARNIVOROUS ZOMBIES!!!!!? MORALS, INDEED!!? THEOCRATS!!!!!!Oh, come on! Clearly, I am not one of Kenneth Starr's squadron of sadistic servants! Since 1963, 14,700 holistic vegetarians have been imprisoned in Iran. Criminals. Um, George W. Bush only wants Nagasaki for the oil! (If only there were oil in Vietnam!) Outrageous! I imagine, the Repooplickins stole the so-called election by intimidating the endangered voters in Nevada! Up yours. Gosh, Bush caused hurricane Katrina by bushwhacking the homeopathic kittens in Hanoi. We've seen this before, in 1993 in coral reefs, when 66,223 insurgent atheists were killed by the Senate. Curious George lied about that too! (Or is that supposed to be a secret!?) Did I miss something. What next!? Will my depressed friends now be browbeaten just because they're feminists!? Certainly it's open season on Wiccans!I reject handguns and destruction! Unlike you AND Jonah Goldberg, I am not in love with DISHONESTY! Since 1999, tens of BILLIONS of paraplegic puppies HAVE been MURDERED in my MIND!!!!! As ANY FOOL can plainly see, I am not one of Michael Reagan's team of flag-waving yes-men!!! Power to the nudists!!!!! Say no to superstition and religion. Say no to OUR GOVERNMENT of the fundies, by the CHRISTIANS, and FOR DEFENSE contractors.

(remember, paragraph breaks are your friend.)



LMAO was that entire reply just to state that I had not paragraph breaks in my reply and I changed the subject once or twice? Some interesting stuff in your reply but it makes no sense...
Reply #124 Top
"As a uninsured nudist, you see I am weird."

Little-whip is a nudist. She might be nude... right now. Can you imagine that?
Reply #125 Top
She might be nude... right now. Can you imagine that?


don't know if i want to


i mean is she a tub of lard or a bean pole. niether that i like.