Bridge Collapse is Example of Crumbling Infastructure!

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahah.... ooh hooo... hehe... ahah... hah.. heh.. *chuckle*

LMAO!!!!

I was waiting for this post all day, it's just too predictable. 

Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Thursday, August 02, 2007
LMAO!!!!

"I was waiting for this post all day, it's just too predictable."

IT IS ALSO TRUE YOU IDIOT!

Yes, Gene, your devotion to the truth is what makes you so predictable.

This has nothing to do with Iraq, and you know it.  I mean seriously gene, you equate everything to Bush and Iraq no matter how ridiculous it is.  Perfect example is this post.

I would go and explain more but we have already covered this the last time you made a post like this. 

Bridge - Infrastructure maintained by the state.

Steam pipe - Infrastructure maintained by the city.

So, where does the Federal governenment, or the war in Iraq come in?  The Fed isn't meant to fix all problems at all levels.

Federal government funds the states, has for a while now. And, due to the commerce clause, the bridge is on an interstate - Federal government's funds pay for most of that. Steam pipe - cities are funded by states, and states by Federal government. The state didn't have enough money to fund the city enough to fix the steam pipe, because the war in Iraq is too costly.

ditto

the money being used for iraq would never have gone to the states for roads, bridges, or steam pipes. dispite what gene or you say or think




it isn't supposed to.



i think you guys missed the part where there was a road crew working on making that bridge stronger when it fell

Money does trickle down, but it's not now nor has it ever been the lion's share of the funding for repair and replacement projects. 

Actually, I think for bridges that it is. I could be wrong, but I thought that the The Federal Bridge Program funding (under FHWA) covered 80% of the cost of bridge upgrades, repairs and replacements. The program, along with other Federal Highway Programs, has seen significant cuts to offset spending for Iraq and Katrina reconstruction. In March of this year, $3.4 Billion was rescinded from FHWA programs, and in June another $871 million -- that's a lot of money that is no longer going to upgrade and repair our transportation infastructure.

Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Thursday, August 02, 2007
This has nothing to do with Iraq, and you know it.

The money we have spent in Iraq would have rebuilt most of the infrastructure in this country. We will have spent almost a TRILLION dollars on Iraq before this is done and we will be less secure then when we started! Some say it is not the Federal Governments responsibility to rebuild the infrastructure. Since when is it the Federal Governments responsibility to invade Iraq? We were not attacked by Iraq nor were they capable of attacking the United States. Even if Saddam had the WMD Bush and Cheney said they had they would not have been any more of a threat then North Korea, Iran, Syria, China or Russia all of whom most likely have the WMD that Bush said Saddam, possessed.

We diverted our military resources from the people who caused 9/11 and today they are back to where they were before 9/11 and now operate both Iraq and Pakistan. HOW has that made us safer? How has the investment of 3,600 lives, 26,000 injuries and a Trillion Dollars been a good investment?

Reply By: Jythier Posted: Thursday, August 02, 2007
Yes, Gene, your devotion to the truth is what makes you so predictable.

Truth is Predictable!




Reply By: Zoomba Posted: Thursday, August 02, 2007
Bridge - Infrastructure maintained by the state. The State DID not Maintain It!

Steam pipe - Infrastructure maintained by the city. The City did not maintain it!

So, where does the Federal government or the war in Iraq come in? The Fed isn't meant to fix all problems at all levels. I answered that in my last post!

We will have spent almost a TRILLION dollars on Iraq before this is done

So here is my question...

Do you honestly believe that if anyone else had won the election that the Trillion Dollars spent in IRAQ would have made it down to projects like this?

I just don't buy it. This bridge didn't get old over night. I also don't buy that the repairs didn't happen because the money was spent in Iraq. For two and a half years now I have watched road crews tear down and rebuild a bridge crossing the Red River.

Gene, I am ashamed of you. These people that were on that bridge don't need you to turn this in to some sort of Bush hating tirade.

He never hesitates at the chance to bash Bush no matter what is involved.  Now he is just posting the usual cut and paste Iraq responses he does in every other post.

So here is my question...

“Do you honestly believe that if anyone else had won the election that the Trillion Dollars spent in IRAQ would have made it down to projects like this?” NO

However, we would have a TRILLION less in Debt and would be better able to deal with issues like this bridge. They have now discovered a report in 1990 and in 2001 that showed corrosion and NOTHING was done about it. The Trillion Dollars that Bush added to the debt from the Iraq War will add $50 Billion EVERY year in interest. That $50 Billion could be used to repair things like bridges, tunnels, water, sewer systems. This is the Very TIP of the Ice Burg!

Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Thursday, August 02, 2007
“Gene, I am ashamed of you. These people that were on that bridge don't need you to turn this in to some sort of Bush hating tirade.”


I DID NOTHING OF THE SORT. What I said was the truth! The policies we are following are ignoring the REAL NEEDS in our country so our president can invade a country that was unjustified and has not made America safer or better off. It is Bush you should be ashamed of! I am ashamed of ANYONE that continues to support Bush and his bankrupt policies!!!!!!!

Is the fact you are a mindless one trick pony Prs. Bush's fault too?

Read what I said about our infrastructure on pages 7, 8 and 55 of my book, George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich. Sadly, all I said is true

Reply By: ParaTed2k Posted: Thursday, August 02, 2007
“Is the fact you are a mindless one trick pony Prs. Bush's fault too?”

You are the type of mindless idiot that has enabled someone like GWB to come to power in our country!

Lou Dobbs reported that 70,000 Bridges have the same safety evaluation as the bridge that Collapsed. 3,500 Dams have a safety rating of D. The electric Grid that failed several years ago has had no major repair. Water and sewer systems are at the end of their life. We are NOT spending even 20% of the levels that Civil Engineers say is needed to deal with the problem.

What we spent on the Iraq war could have replaced MOST of the needed infrastructure. Now we still have to repair the infrastructure as well as deal with the Trillion Dollars Bush has added to our debt from the Iraq War. His tax and spending policies have added a total of $4 Trillion to the national debt which will increase the interest on the debt EVERY YEAR by $200 Billion. That is what King George has done in less then 7 years!

it will take so many weeks to replace this bridge. your saying that if we were not in iraq we could replace it faster. tell me how.

(Repeating earlier challenge)

Col,

As I have said repeatedly before, I would be more than happy to offer a review of your books if you send me complimentary copies.

“it will take so many weeks to replace this bridge. You’re saying that if we were not in Iraq we could replace it faster. Tell me how.”

I said NOTHING of the sort. What I said is if we had used the money we WASTED in Iraq we would have much of the resources to PAY for this work. Bush will have added another $200 BILLION dollars in interest on the $4 Trillion Dollars he added to the National Debt. That $200 Billion in interest is EVERY YEAR and we still must some day repay that $4 Trillion that the Bush tax and spending policies added. These are the facts that you who support Bush and his policies refuse to acknowledge.

Col,

As I have said repeatedly before, I would be more than happy to offer a review of your books if you send me complimentary copies.

YOUR PURCHASE of my book would be the best $14 you ever spent! I have had my book reviewed. Here is what they said:


Book Reviews, Book Lover Resources, Advice for Writers and Publishers
Home / Reviewer's Bookwatch
Reviewer's Bookwatch
Volume 6, Number 10 October 2006

Burroughs' Bookshelf
George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich
Gene P. Abel
AuthorHouse
1663 Liberty Drive Suite 200, Bloomington, IN 47403
1425929427 $13.99 www.authorhouse.com 1-800-839-8640

George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich by Gene P. Abel, Colonel, USAR Ret. (over 30 years of service as a commissioned officer, and two-time recipient of the Meritorious Service Medal) severely questions the immediate and long-term effects to America that the Bush administration is responsible for. Sharply critical, George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich decries the administration's narrow-minded attempts to partially privatize Social Security without providing any transition fund for the interim monies that would be lost; the administration's alienation of its foreign allies in the years after the September 11 attacks due its blind press for war in Iraq; and the administration's utter failure to balance the budget or prevent an explosion of the national deficit. At the same time, George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich is not universally negative; it notes the wise actions that President Bush has taken, but laments that the harmful actions may well outweigh the good in the president's legacy for the 21st century. Drawing information from more than 40 renowned sources, and including humorous blogs to convey points with a twist, George W. Bush Robin Hood For The Rich not only identifies potential current and future problems stemming from the Bush administration but also offers recommendations for alternatives to cope with their personal impact on individual lives. Highly recommended.