danielost danielost

according to some on here

according to some on here

it is time to surrender

becouse we can't win this war of ideas.

becouse we are not any safer than if we weren't fighting

becouse bush is in charge.

becouse of this

becouse of that

becouse clinton would surrender

becouse gore wouild surrender

becouse we back isreal

becouse i have run out of becouses
14,495 views 47 replies
Reply #26 Top
you have misspelled as much as i have.


Wrong, Danielost. This is another of your many outright lies! If I make a typo, I assure you it is a slip of the fingers, not a lack of ability. I make a few typos, sure, but my grammar, spelling, and writing spells have been tested MANY times and have consistently passed the test. I dare say that college English professors have a little more knowledge than you in that department.

ANd now you say you've never been a perfect speller. After asserting that you always had "becouse" counted as right on your "spilling tists". I think your teacher was just trying to find a few words close enough to pass you on to the next grade. After all, you take NO correction, you refuse to admit when you are wrong, and you attack those who try to offer advice.

Ignorance is the lack of knowledge; stupidity is a REFUSAL to acquire knowledge. You, in my opinion, possess the latter!
Reply #27 Top
the two of you keep telling me how bad a speller i am. at the same time you both are misspelling your own words to attack my spelling.


but where as i claim i cannot spell. you two idiots claim you can.


can anyone see a problem here.

i don't know what the correct spelling the word spilt spelt spelled is but does it really matter.


unlike you i try not to do personal attacks on people for their weakness. dictator gene not with standing, since his weakness is his brain.


as for the 2nd amendment i stated that it said that the right to bare arms was given to the citizens of the united states. To make the government think twice before entering your home.

and since the ones who were trying to get rid of the 2nd amendment was the government/police so they can enter a home without worrying about being shot it was working.


that should have told you that the government/police want to be able to come into your home, car, office, pockets, whatever anytime they want to without a warrant.


but i guess you were to stupid to get that little thing.

and in this thread i said you might be right.

but that i was trying to say what i said above. BUT NO SPELLING IS ALL YOU CARE ABOUT SO THE NEXT TIME YOU CHEW ME OUT ABOUT MY SPELLING. MAKE SURE YOU SPELL YOUR WORDS RIGHT.
Reply #28 Top
and in this thread i said you might be right.


No, I AM right, there is a difference!

but that i was trying to say what i said above. BUT NO SPELLING IS ALL YOU CARE ABOUT SO THE NEXT TIME YOU CHEW ME OUT ABOUT MY SPELLING. MAKE SURE YOU SPELL YOUR WORDS RIGHT.


Actually, I don't hit heavy on spelling, danielost. You are the ONLY individual I have so roundly criticized for your spelling. Because it is atrocious, often bordering on unreadable. In this thread I did not even comment until after you continued to insist it was an acceptable spelling.

The typos in my comments are actually quite few, danielost. My writing passes muster from some pretty high handed critics. You want me to categorically list yours? It would take all day!

Reply #29 Top
i gave you three links and only one of them was youtube

the word because is the same as becouse.

the only difference is that because is the preferred spelling.

if you want i will look up more links with my spelling but i thought three would do it

and for the other i consider it closed.


poor babies ego is bruised becouse i won't submit to him. on one sugject and as i said i am not perfect and i don't want to be perfect. i just want to be me.

as far as i know you write for a living.
Reply #30 Top
poor babies ego is bruised becouse i won't submit to him. on one sugject and as i said i am not perfect and i don't want to be perfect. i just want to be me.


YOU CALLED ME A LIAR, DANIELOST! That WAS, that IS the point! You called me a liar despite my giving you MOUNTAINS of proof as to my position.

The problem you have is that you REFUSE to learn. You don't WANT to be educated. You'd rather make excuses and feel sorry for yourself!

You want to know my problem with you danielost? I'll lay it out for you:

You have a decent foundation for your ideas, but you're sloppy and lazy in your follow through. While you could take care to present a cohesive point, you don't even try, and when corrected, you go on the offensive. Frankly I don't care if "becouse" IS an alternative spelling (although NO dictionary sites I have found support that). It's a minor issue. What is NOT a minor issue is your refusal to engage in rational, intelligent discussion.

I KNOW there's more to you than that, danielost. I KNOW you can't possibly be as stupid as you present yourself to be. And yet you don't seem to care to even TRY!
Reply #33 Top
What was the topic of this article again?

A Little Poem Regarding Computer Spell Checkers...

Eye halve a spelling chequer
It came with my pea sea
It plainly marques four my revue
Miss steaks eye kin knot sea.

Eye strike a key and type a word
And weight four it two say
Weather eye am wrong oar write
It shows me strait a weigh.

As soon as a mist ache is maid
It nose bee fore two long
And eye can put the error rite
Its rare lea ever wrong.

Eye have run this poem threw it
I am shore your pleased two no
Its letter perfect awl the weigh
My chequer tolled me sew.


LOL, I actually checked it, out of curiosity and the only word that came out wrong was chequer
Reply #34 Top
OK can we get back on topic, or start it for that matter? Why? Becouse.
Reply #35 Top
the topic is the democrats and gene and sometimes sean want us to surrender to al quida
Reply #36 Top
I don't think Sean wants us to surrender, but I am sure he wants his party to win. He just doesn't get that they are both one in the same. BTRW, if what LW said is true then we should not be knocking on Sean's remarks if he can't be here to defend himself. It's not fair. I don't really care but it's not fair.
Reply #37 Top
you have misspelled as much as i have.


That, by the way, is another of your outright, bald faced LIES, danielost.

As long as you keep lying, you're not going to find me letting up! If I misspelled as much as you, I would have FAILED all of my college English classes, and gotten piss poor grades in the rest of them. I assure you, such has not been the case.
Reply #38 Top
wow. I had a spelling fight once, but this one is far worse than mine!
Reply #39 Top
That, by the way, is another of your outright, bald faced LIES, danielost.

As long as you keep lying, you're not going to find me letting up! If I misspelled as much as you, I would have FAILED all of my college English classes, and gotten piss poor grades in the rest of them. I assure you, such has not been the case.


OK your right not as much as me but in almost all of your posts. but when i use my spell checker i ignore your misspells and everyone else's when i quote them
Reply #40 Top
F.
Reply #41 Top
OK your right not as much as me but in almost all of your posts. but when i use my spell checker i ignore your misspells and everyone else's when i quote them


Are you aware that NAMES will often trigger a spell checker, danielost? Or common abbreviations?

I'll tell you what: next time I post any post with the numerous glaring spelling errors you allege, call me on them. If there are more than three LEGITIMATE spelling errors, I will retract everything I have said about your spelling. If I can defend them, then you need to take back everything YOU'VE said...deal?
Reply #42 Top
I'll tell you what: next time I post any post with the numerous glaring spelling errors you allege, call me on them. If there are more than three LEGITIMATE spelling errors, I will retract everything I have said about your spelling. If I can defend them, then you need to take back everything YOU'VE said...deal?


why then i would not be any better than you
Reply #43 Top
why then i would not be any better than you


You won't because you CAN'T, danielost. If college professors can't do it, I assure you someone with spelling skills that are surpassed by my 9 year old would certainly not be able to do it.
Reply #44 Top
You won't because you CAN'T, danielost. If college professors can't do it, I assure you someone with spelling skills that are surpassed by my 9 year old would certainly not be able to do it.


take this to the other feed that is why i started it
Reply #45 Top

It is true, and you can see for yourself by looking at his profile. I've been told his 'time out' will be of a two-week duration.


How come I'm always the last one to find out?

As far as being 'fair' goes, Sean doesn't deserve that consideration.


LOL, that's why I said "I don't care", but I still wanted to be a little fair.

I don't know and I don't care, Charles, and you can refrain from referring to the poor boy during his time-out if you must. It's not right to admonish daniel to do the same, though, especially on his own thread.


I don't know about it not being right. I don't see anything wrong with suggesting waiting till Sean comes back to give him a piece of your mind rather then spit on him while he's unable to defend himself. I figured it was a manner of being more honorable, more of a man to fight one on one, face to face rather then behind their backs. I personally don't really care f people want to tell me what to do, it's what I do with their suggestions that matter. People have the right to believe that I should stop or continue with something, I won't take that from them, doesn't mean I will listen to them either. Blacklisting is not a feature I consider necessary when it comes to debating. If you can't handle the argument you shouldn't be in a debate in the first place. To me blacklisting is a feature to stop things like spammers, children in an adult content article and just someone who is waaaaay to annoying that he wont even stick to the topic and is actually irritating even the website owners. But not because you don't like what the other person has to say. But hey, if daniel does not like it too bad. I was simply trying to be fair, even if it is Sean.

BTW, thanks for teaching me a new word. I never heard of admonish. I learn something new everyday I always say.
Reply #46 Top
Becouse I Said So


WWW Link


~Becouse-i-said-so


WWW Link

Which is your preferred movie?Becouse...?


WWW Link


ok there i am not the only one using this spelling and this is the last i will say about it


"All" you have given us is 2 anime sites and another where that person is "obviously" deficient in spelling also. Just give it up "because" your wrong!

From dictionary.com

No results found for becouse.
Did you mean because (in dictionary) or Because (in encyclopedia)?



Also from the same source.


Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source
be·cause /bɪˈkɔz, -ˈkɒz, -ˈkʌz/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[bi-kawz, -koz, -kuhz] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–conjunction 1. for the reason that; due to the fact that: The boy was absent because he was ill.
—Idiom2. because of, by reason of; due to: Schools were closed because of heavy snowfall.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Origin: 1275–1325; ME bi cause by cause]


—Synonyms 1. Because, as, since, for, inasmuch as agree in implying a reason for an occurrence or action. Because introduces a direct reason: I was sleeping because I was tired. As and since are so casual as to imply merely circumstances attendant on the main statement: As (or since) I was tired, I was sleeping. The reason, proof, or justification introduced by for is like an afterthought or a parenthetical statement: I was sleeping, for I was tired. Inasmuch as implies concession; the main statement is true in view of the circumstances introduced by this conjunction: Inasmuch as I was tired, it seemed best to sleep.
—Usage note 1. See reason.
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source be·cause (bĭ-kôz', -kŭz') Pronunciation Key
conj. For the reason that; since.


[Middle English; see because of.]


Usage Note: A traditional rule holds that the construction the reason is because is redundant, and should be avoided in favor of the reason is that. The usage is well established, however, and can be justified by analogy to constructions such as His purpose in calling her was so that she would be forewarned of the change in schedule or The last time I saw her was when she was leaving for college. All three constructions are somewhat less than graceful, however. · A favorite rule of schoolteachers (but curiously absent from the tradition of usage commentary) is that a sentence must not begin with because. Sometimes, however, because is perfectly appropriate as the opening word of a sentence, as in the beginning of one of Emily Dickinson's best-known poems: "Because I could not stop for Death—/He kindly stopped for me." In fact, sentences beginning with because are quite common in written English. · Another rule states that one should not use a clause beginning with because as the subject of a sentence, as in Just because he thinks it a good idea doesn't mean it's a good idea. This construction is perfectly acceptable, but it carries a colloquial flavor and may best be reserved for informal situations. See Usage Note at as1.

(Download Now or Buy the Book) The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2006 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Online Etymology Dictionary - Cite This Source
because

c.1305, bi cause "by cause," modeled on Fr. par cause. Originally a phrase, often followed by a subordinate clause introduced by that or why.

Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2001 Douglas Harper
Kernerman English Multilingual Dictionary (Beta Version) - Cite This Source
because [biˈkoz] conjunction

for the reason that
Example: I can't go because I am ill.


For God's sake man. Either "learn" to spell correctly or get a REAL spell checker. I have 3 different ones and they "all" say you're wrong.
Reply #47 Top


Don't feel bad, it's not like admins make some grand announcement or anything..."Ta-Dah...so and so will now spend some time in their JU room."

The only reason I'm aware of it is because I was directly involved.


Where is that article about "what new features to add to JU"? I think it would be fantastic to have a category about who's been permanently banned and temporarily dismissed from the site. As punishment a constant barrage of cracks on them for being removed indefinitely or temporarily. LOL.



Heh, this 'man' has been doing the same thing to me for months now, refusing to go one-on-one, taking potshots from behind his blacklist, and/or deleting my comments and crying to admins when I've gone around his blacklist to respond via the forums.


I know what you mean. I try to be a sport when it comes to debating and I try not to bring along the anger of previous arguments onto a new topic. But there are people here who deserve nothing less than to have the first words "You're an idiot" on each of my replies to them before actually debating. Col comes to mind. I respond to his with the concept that he is an idiot from the get go.

Ever hear the saying 'what goes around, comes around?' This is a great example.


That is my fav saying. I live by those words and believe in them as much as I believe in God.