Winter 2006-07, though late in coming, was one of the worst in recent record, and thus, one of the worst for GW-drum beaters, now scrambling, pushing desperately hard for their cause; half the country was encased in ice and snow. Dozens died across America, killed by weather-related incidents; billions lost in crop revenues, due to freakishly low temperatures in California and Florida. Finally, skeptical opposition arises. Books and scientific studies become more and more prominent, despite the GW Nazis efforts to squelch them, and any opposition to their orthodoxy.
Lord save us. The severe nature of the event discribed is a classic sign of Global Warming, the latter will cause such severe weather patterns.
Whether or not Global Warming is actually happening is of course the great debate, but in order to participate in a debate, at least research the background to the topic,m and the alledged cause and effect of Global Warming. Not to do so as above totally destroys the post and obvious passionate personal views, to a meaningless nothing.
I personally believe it is happening, and faster than we realise. However I also believe its a natural weather cycle - the evidence for this is overwhelming. The Earth has for millions of years gone through weather cycles, Ice Ages yaddie yadda, its a natural phenomina of the Planet. There is an argument to say that the latest cycle has been accelarated since the Industrial Revolution a hundred years ago, and that maybe true, but if so only by a few decades, meanwhile the larger more significant cycle of events is unstoppable.
The whole saga has however raised a valid point - we should look after our Planet better, and prevent huge detrimental environmental effects in various parts of the world - eg the appauling environmental conditions in Chinese industrial cities, abuse of river systems that dry up and stop agricultural irregation, the drying up of various inner seas in Southern Russia for Hydro Electirc purposes turning a 4000 square mile inner sea into a dust bowl, devastating the lives of the local inhabitants. That much is common sense, although hard to achieve when there are other conflicting priorities around - nothing is ever simple - there will always be conflicting priorities, as there will always be those on either side of the debate who seek to over-simplify the issues involved.
Meanwhile we should all search our minds and ask what our motivation in making a stance on the topic is - notority, conviction, a love of their air conditioner, cheap petrol and gas guzzlers - whatever - but in doing so facts, not irresponsible selfish myths based on personal greed/gain, and the attendent half truths, need to be uttered, or we all go in circles.