COL Gene

Hezbollah Attacking U.S. Forces in Iraq

▼

Hezbollah Attacking U.S. Forces in Iraq

CNN Just Reported We Now Have Another Enemy in Iraq!

from JoeUser Forums



CNN just reported that American Officials have confirmed Hezbollah forces from Lebanon are coming into Iraq and attacking U.S. Forces with the most sophisticated bombs that can destroy our best armor. Now we have the internal factions, al Qaeda and now Hezbollah to deal with in Iraq. The security situation continues to get worse every week and this turn of events is another sign that we are not controlling the violence.


We have spent over 4 years to train over 350,000 Iraqi Military and police and the violence from internal and external terrorists is getting worse. When will Bush accept that we can not end the violence without the Iraqi People taking control of their country!
politics
10,988 views 37 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
That does not alter the fact that almost every day Bush does something else that shows just how bad a President he is


for being such a bad president he has the democrats in Washington jumping to his tune.
Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top
ahem.

If you have any loved ones in Ira (sp). Know they are in danger. Know also that the best way to save them is to remove them from the field of danger.

If you support the troops, bring them home. away from danger.

Duh.

Fucking duh.

Our freedom is under attack at home not abroad. (see: Patriot act)

Fucking duh.

GIMME a D

GIMME a U

GIMME an H

DUH.


Galactic Civilizations IV
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
"why don't you give us your opinion instead of the party line because everything i have ever seen you write on here has been party line"

What I Post is MY Opinion predicated on the facts!

"and the only thing Nixon did wrong was to end the Vietnam war without permission from the weapons makers. " That PROVES you are an IDIOT!

"for being such a bad president he has the democrats in Washington jumping to his tune. " No the Democrats DO NOT have enough VOTES to pass what the Majority of Americans want. That will be corrected in November 2008!

"If you support the troops, bring them home. away from danger." We placed our troops into a war that was not justified and DID NOT provide the manpower NEEDED to WIN the Fight. That is NOT supporting our troops and is because of GWB!
Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top
"If you support the troops, bring them home. away from danger." We placed our troops into a war that was not justified and DID NOT provide the manpower NEEDED to WIN the Fight. That is NOT supporting our troops and is because of GWB!


see i knew you supported a mass murderer. leave Saddam in power because he could control the people. but how did he control the people through murder. so by all means let us put a mass murderer back in power. and we must leave the Sudanese alone because they know how to control their people too.



What I Post is MY Opinion predicated on the facts!


what you post is the party line i have heard this from the demos in power.

Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
see i knew you supported a mass murderer. leave Saddam in power because he could control the people. but how did he control the people through murder. so by all means let us put a mass murderer back in power. and we must leave the Sudanese alone because they know how to control their people too.

It was NOT our responsibility to remove Saddam to liberate the Iraqi People. That was their job. Bush did not go to Congress and say he wanted to invade Iraq to liberate the Iraqi people. He and Cheney made the case that the USA was in danger from Saddam which was NOT true. If we liberated all people in the world that are under the rule of evil Dictators, we would be fighting Iraq Type Wars all over the world. The dictators in several countries in Africa, North Korea, China, Syria, Iran etc. The dictators in several African countries have killed many more people then Saddam ever killed. However the do not have oil!

You can not justify sending our military into Iraq to liberate the Iraqi People! That excuse was developed AFTER we could not locate WMD. If Bush had allowed the UN weapons Inspectors to finish their work, we would have learned the was NO WMD in Iraq.
Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top
You can not justify sending our military into Iraq to liberate the Iraqi People! That excuse was developed AFTER we could not locate WMD.


they found 500 wmds in iraq how many more did they need to find
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
"They found 500 wmds in Iraq how many more did they need to find”

They were old gas filled Artillery Shells that posed no danger to anyone in the United States. In fact they most likely could not have been used effectively even in Iraq.
Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top
They were old gas filled Artillery Shells that posed no danger to anyone in the United States. In fact they most likely could not have been used effectively even in Iraq.


they were weapons that were supposed to have been destroyed.

you keep missing the evidence.

Syria has the gas weapons.

Iran has the nukes.
Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
If Bush had allowed the UN weapons Inspectors to finish their work


Saddam was the one who kept kicking them out when ever they wanted to inspect someplace that was off limits to them.

why were these places off limits to them if Saddam didn't have any wmd's to be found


now answer my question

how many people are you willing to sacrifice for peace. 5, 10, 500, or the million or so people in Israel.
Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top


Reply By: danielost Posted: Saturday, July 07, 2007
They were old gas filled Artillery Shells that posed no danger to anyone in the United States. In fact they most likely could not have been used effectively even in Iraq.


they were weapons that were supposed to have been destroyed.

you keep missing the evidence.

Syria has the gas weapons.

Iran has the nukes.


There is NOT one scrap of evidence of that! The Intelligence agreed that Saddam had old gas filled Artillery shells. The Intelligence also said he had no Nuclear weapons or program. That has been proven after looking in Iraq for 4 1/2 years. All the Mushroom Cloud BS that Bush and Cheney used to scare Americans was a LIE and they knew it was a LIE when they told us we were in danger from Saddam’s nuclear weapons. There were none and the intelligence said so which Bush and Cheney IGNORED!



how many people are you willing to sacrifice for peace. 5, 10, 500, or the million or so people in Israel.

My answer is ZERO. I only would risk the lives of our people if there was a just reason and then use our military power in such a war as to insure victory. That is just what we DID NOT do in Iraq.

First, there was no danger to the United States that warranted sending our military into Iraq.Second, when we made the mistake of invading Iraq we did not provide the manpower to do the job. We had enough troops to depose Saddam but not even close to the number needed to prevent the Civil War and the foreign terrorists from tearing Iraq apart!

As far as Israel is concerned all the dead on both sides that have been sacrificed has not moved us closer to a settlement that would END the Killing!

Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: danielost Posted: Saturday, July 07, 2007
If Bush had allowed the UN weapons Inspectors to finish their work


Saddam was the one who kept kicking them out when ever they wanted to inspect someplace that was off limits to them.

The UN weapons Inspectors were prevented for completing their work by Bush and the Invasion of Iraq.
Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top
The UN weapons Inspectors were prevented for completing their work by Bush and the Invasion of Iraq.


give it up that was the last demand that bush made before we invaded.

that Saddam allow the inspectors back into the country.

he didn't and we invaded.

also if he didn't have any weapons then why did the government of Iraq announce that if we invaded they would use those weapons that they didn't have. it was too late for bluffs.