Moderateman Moderateman

The Most Dangerous woman In America

The Most Dangerous woman In America

The Devourer

A women in Charge, Carl Bernstein's biography of Hillary Clinton. This is not a favorable portrait of Hillary.

As a result, it's pretty safe to say the central question facing Democratic voters in the presidential primaries is: which candidate will be most effective at rolling back the Bush years? On issue after issue, the Democratic contenders are doing everything they can to highlight their differences with Bush. As usual the Democrats offer nothing of any value except to say except "I am not Bush" "Bush is bad" "Bush is wrong" well kiddies from the left Bush is not running in case you have not noticed yet. Wake-up and start offering some solution to major problems that make sense besides "raising taxes" "more entitlements"

But when it comes to the issue of secrecy and an administration operating in the shadows, there's an argument to be made that the candidate least likely to turn on the lights is Hillary Clinton. Her lifelong commitment to secrecy is one of the main themes of Bernstein's book.

"Hillary Rodham Clinton has always had a difficult relationship with the truth,"{read she is a big fathead liar} writes Bernstein. "She has often chosen to obfuscate, omit, and avoid. It is an understatement by now that she has been known to apprehend truths about herself and the events of her life that others do not exactly share." Selective memory is what I call it and somehow Hillary always comes out smelling like a rose instead of the fertilizer that makes the roses grow.

Or, as Bernstein summed it up on the Today Show, "This is a woman who led a camouflaged life and continues to."

It's not just that she's a private person. There are plenty of public servants who are zealous about guarding their personal lives and equally zealous about keeping their public lives -- and public policies -- transparent. But, like Bush and Cheney, Clinton seems devoted to secrecy for its own sake.

As Bernstein shows, what was most shocking about her handling of the health care fiasco during her husband's administration wasn't that she kept the plan secret from its critics, but that she kept it secret even from those who would have been champions of the plan had they known anything about it.

This passion for concealment is a pattern that, as Bernstein demonstrates, has been repeated throughout Clinton's life. It was there in the head-scratching decision to hide her college thesis from public view because it was about radical organizer Saul Alinsky. It was there in her refusal for 30 years to admit that she had failed the bar exam the first time she took it. It was there in the way she glossed over in her memoir her summer internship at the law firm of Treuhaft, Walker, and Burnstein -- one of the most renowned left-wing law firms in the nation. It was there in the way she handled the Whitewater and Travelgate investigations, which, as Bernstein told me, "ended up unnecessarily prolonging them."

Bernstein quotes Clinton lawyer Mark Fabiani as saying of Hillary and Whitewater: "She would do anything to get out of the situation. And if that involved not being forthcoming [in releasing documents and other materials] she herself would say, 'I have a reason for not being forthcoming.'" And he reports that then-White House advisor George Stephanopoulos described Hillary's responses to the various scandals of the Clinton presidency as "Jesuitical lying."

"Hillary Clinton and her advisers apparently don't want people to know her real story," Carl Bernstein told me. "That is particularly sad because the authentic picture of her life is so much more compelling than the tired, airbrushed, and sanitized version they keep serving up and refining. The campaign's official response to A Woman in Charge -- even before they had seen the book -- is the kind of thing I would have expected from the Nixon White House or the Bush White House, not a Clinton presidential campaign committed to a new openness and transparency."

On the campaign trail, Clinton talks a lot about her experience in the White House -- clearly we're meant to factor those eight years in when evaluating her fitness to return. But reading the Bernstein book made me feel like she has taken away all the wrong lessons about being in power. Her tendency to hide and obfuscate appears to be a learned behavior.

So the question facing Democrats -- and, indeed, the country -- is whether we want another presidency cloaked in secrecy, deception, and denial.

If I had to chose I would vote for any other Democratic candidate BUT Hillary Clinton who I believe is corrupt, power hungry and will take the country in the wrong direction.

  I used many quotes from several articles I read for information, I have not sourced the articles I got the information from because I did not want to make my article look like some kind of thesis.

 

15,004 views 36 replies
Reply #26 Top

Congrats on the feature MM.

Now, on the issue of moving out of the country....

I was talking with my wife about a friend that lives in Canada, near Niagra Falls.  I think it was during a period when the Nationals were playing in Toronto, but I might be wrong....  Anyway, I was telling her that I'd still like to get away from home for a short vacation, perhaps taking a road trip up to New York (I want to go visit the baseball Hall of Fame), and then perhaps swinging up into Canada to visit my friend there (she's invited my wife and I a few times, though we've never met face to face.   I just know her from playing against and with her on Xbox Live).

Somehow I said something about with global warming (joking about it) perhaps it would be better to move to Canada.  The wife couldn't tell if I was serious or not, or just how much I was joking so she commented back that I would never move to Canada.

I reminded her not to be so hasty.... she had to think about it for a bit and then said, "oh yeah.  Hillary..."

I'm not that inclined to leave the area, but at the same time if I knew I had a job to go to, I'd probably abandon ship pretty quick if Hillary moves back into the White House.

I guess I could tolerate it for a while, but I just suspect that she'd so badly botch things it would take years and years to undo and get back to something most of us would consider normal.  Yeah, yeah, I know that there are plenty that are of the belief that it will take years and years to undo the damage that they believe Bush has done, but he is nothing in comparison to what she could and would do.

Reply #27 Top
Reply By: JythierPosted: Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Oh, I know. Harmless old coots, definitely.

Good glad we got that understanding.


About as harmless as a colony of fire ants!   
Reply #28 Top

 

Reply By: terpfan1980Posted: Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Congrats on the feature MM.

thank you, funny it's so rare that people feel the need to congradulate me.

Somehow I said something about with global warming (joking about it) perhaps it would be better to move to Canada. The wife couldn't tell if I was serious or not, or just how much I was joking so she commented back that I would never move to Canada.

Fortunately Coll and I have enough that we could go somewhere and need no money coming in if we were fairly frugal.

Maybe Brazil.

Reply #29 Top

Reply By: drmilerPosted: Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Reply By: JythierPosted: Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Oh, I know. Harmless old coots, definitely.

Good glad we got that understanding.


About as harmless as a colony of fire ants!

more like KILLER BEES

Reply #30 Top

more like KILLER BEES

You do kind of remind me of Belushi.

Reply #31 Top

Reply By: Dr GuyPosted: Thursday, June 28, 2007
more like KILLER BEES

You do kind of remind me of Belushi.

John or jim? Please please say john, He was one of the funniest men to ever shoot heroin and cocaine at the same time and kill himself. ever!

Reply #32 Top
Reply By: Dr GuyPosted: Thursday, June 28, 2007
more like KILLER BEES

You do kind of remind me of Belushi.

John or jim? Please please say john, He was one of the funniest men to ever shoot heroin and cocaine at the same time and kill himself. ever!


Jim could "never" be the funny man like John was. Jim's good but he ain't that good.
Reply #33 Top
John or jim? Please please say john, He was one of the funniest men to ever shoot heroin and cocaine at the same time and kill himself. ever!


Maybe it is my age (and I like Jim a lot as an actor), but when I hear Belushi - I think of John. Besides, the reference was to SNL (for you younger folks).
Reply #34 Top
(Citizen)drmilerJune 28, 2007 13:29:17


Reply By: Dr GuyPosted: Thursday, June 28, 2007
more like KILLER BEES

You do kind of remind me of Belushi.

John or jim? Please please say john, He was one of the funniest men to ever shoot heroin and cocaine at the same time and kill himself. ever!


Jim could "never" be the funny man like John was. Jim's good but he ain't that good.


me too docm When I hear Belushi I think John, may he rest in Peace.
Reply #35 Top
(Citizen)Dr GuyJune 28, 2007 13:33:35


John or jim? Please please say john, He was one of the funniest men to ever shoot heroin and cocaine at the same time and kill himself. ever!


Maybe it is my age (and I like Jim a lot as an actor), but when I hear Belushi - I think of John. Besides, the reference was to SNL (for you younger folks).


man, how do we go from Hillary being the most dangerous woman in America to John and Jim Belushi? Talk about 3 old senile men {me, you and docm} heh heh heh
Reply #36 Top
Talk about 3 old senile men {me, you and docm} heh heh heh


What? Busting School Children?