remember this when ya'll are gettin all mad cause someone is trashing a republican who hasn't even been indicited on a charge.

and i only make that point to show that everyone is equally as guilty when it comes to throwing bombs based on a public opinion court. whether or not kennedy did anything is irrelevant. the point is that both sides conveniently raise and lower the standards depending on the personality involved.

it's something everyone who is politically active, and some who aren't, is guilty of, at least from time to time, including myself.


btw, after the dust settles on jefferson, look for the next corruption target to start making headlines, and it will be ted stevens most likey, based on some early rumblings in and around the FBI and steven's office.

questions...when will be the proper time that someone can begin trashing him? when a formal investigation was launched? when one side's evidence is leaked? when some talking head makes some great "gotcha " point? when he is indicted? when he is convicted?

just some questions...

, after the dust settles on jefferson, look for the next corruption target to start making headlines, and it will be ted stevens most likey, based on some early rumblings in and around the FBI and steven's office. questions...when will be the proper time that someone can begin trashing him? when a formal investigation was launched? when one side's evidence is leaked? when some talking head makes some great "gotcha " point? when he is indicted? when he is convicted?

Reply By: Sean Conners aka SConn1Posted: Sunday, June 10, 2007

 

how about you start when they find 90,000 in "COLD" hahahahah cash in his freezer.. Personally I come down on lawbreakers from either party.

maybe in this case..but who's to say he wasn't framed or someone didn't make that up? i'm not saying he was, and in his case, like you, i don't need a court to convince me that he was up to no good.

but MM, another question,,,is the "breaking of the law" the ONLY standard that we judge by? aside from that, i want to be confident that my representatives in each branch of government are making GOOD decisions.

I want a cookie. A super plus awesome elite cookie.

Reply By: Texas WahinePosted: Sunday, June 10, 2007 I want a cookie. A super plus awesome elite cookie.

Ummmmmm I can't give that to you, but I could give you a huge...... never mind. heh heh heh  {with a tip of hat to Adrian}

Hmm, I know how to help you with that. You need to find a house with a pair of shoes hanging over the powerlines out front. Just go in and ask and they'll set you up.

Mitt Romney. Oh wait, he's not a liberal anymore since he's running outside of Massachussettes.

Of the 4 mentioned so far, Edwards, O'Donnel, Jefferson and Kennedy, all are good (Kennedy is an easy target).  I would include AL Gore "The sky is falling, but I wont debate you".

But Jefferson and Kennedy get it for previous exploits.  Al gore is waiting to win the Nobel prize, and O'Donnel is too easy.  SO I put Edwards on top ("Use Memorial day to trash the troops!").

well, if we're gona go there...how bout Rudy Giuliani?

"most conservative" mayor of NYC ? that's like being the thinnest kid at fat camp.

I say we should put Rosie and John in a Celebrity Death Match and who ever winds can be crowned cause it's too hard for me to decide between a "lady?" who thjinks we are the worst thing on this planet and a guy who befriends a celebrity who calls Chaves his brother who's best friends with Fidel Castro.

Ok now that we have our five LIBERAL PEICES OF SHIT NOMINEES LETS GET TO VOTING.

 

EDWARDS  X

O'DONNELL

Jefferson

Gore

Drunken Ted

Just copy and paste and mark with an X your choice for LIBERAL PEICE OF SHIT OF THE YEAR.

 

Reply By: CharlesCS1Posted: Monday, June 11, 2007 I say we should put Rosie and John in a Celebrity Death Match and who ever winds can be crowned cause it's too hard for me to decide between a "lady?" who thjinks we are the worst thing on this planet and a guy who befriends a celebrity who calls Chaves his brother who's best friends with Fidel Castro.

Rosie would win just by sitting her 700 pound fat anti-American ass on Edwards.

OK then:

EDWARDS

O'DONNELL X

Jefferson

Gore

Drunken Ted

EDWARDS X O'DONNELL Jefferson Gore Drunken Ted

Reverse Gore and Jefferson for me.  Otherwise, sorry Teddy {hic}, you are only 5th this year.

there is no "order" doc, there is just the Grand loser and then the rest of the pack of losers. So your vote is for Edwards?
If so it is now Edwards 2 votes Rosie One vote.

Put me in for Rosie....since I nominated her in the first place MM. I should at least vote her in.

well then we now have a tie, two for Edwards and two for Rosie.

No, I already told you . . .

EDWARDS

O'DONNELL

Jefferson

Gore

Drunken Ted

Crazy Ol' Chonino X

That's my vote.

Crazy Ol' Chonino X That's my vote.

Reply By: SanChoninoPosted: Monday, June 11, 2007 HEY!!!! THIS AIN'T NO DEMOCRACY HERE, you vote for the five losers and you ain't one of them! No, I already told you . . .

 

Reply By: little-whipPosted: Monday, June 11, 2007 You said 'Liberal IDIOT of the Year', not liberal 'nominee.' If we aren't limited to nominees, I might add my thoughts here.

read it anyway yer wanna S, just vote. We had nominees 5 of them, now we are down to the nitty gritty {dirt band} and voting.

That's it? a two to two tie between rosie {fat ass} and John {will say anything to be President}? yikes!

Well, I suppose I can't for more than one?? Otherwise it's toooooo hard to decide.

Really! An election where we can vote FOR someone, and not against someone.

I think Gore would be better suited for "Liberal Hypocrite of the Year".

Okay okay, I'll put in for Teddy boy.

Well, it seems that even in a little friendly funny poll the Democrats can't get it right. They can't even lose without falling all over each other.