"American Muslims aren't constantly propagandized and indoctrinated from the womb to hate the Jews and the Great Satan, either, as they are in the MidEast."
Nope, they aren't. They're still Muslims, though. Kind of defeats your point, huh? Obviously, if Islam was the problem, the indoctrination would be anywhere the religion was found. Instead, you only find it in places where the people are politically and economically oppressed, and radical Islam is a tool that is used.
The idiotic part of this is that anyone who ever read anything I wrote on Islam knows that I am not an apologist for it. I never have been. I've been scathingly critical of it. I hate any literalist silliness that makes people deny reality in favor of something some guy wrote hundreds or thousands of years ago.
I hate it with Christianity, and I hate it with Islam. People talk about how I "changed", but I haven't changed. I still think Islam lacks their reformation. I still think literalism and fundamentalism is killing a lot of people around the world.
Why I seemed to change is because as I saw the mob I was in getting closer to the deep end, I slammed on the breaks. They didn't, and continued roaring toward the abyss of irrational fear and loathing they now live in. As they saw me disappearing in their rear view mirror, I guess it seemed like I was moving away from them.
It doesn't take much to come back to it. Just dedication to the ideals that this nation was founded upon. Simply asking yourself what the current slur that is oozing out of your mouth like diarrhea is really going to accomplish. Pondering "Is this something that Osama bin Laden would quote to prove Americans hate Muslims".
Short of that, people will just keep creating the same environment he predicts here. He'll call us monsters, in response we'll act like monsters, and another generation of young Muslims around the world will fear us in the EXACT same way that Rightwinger fears them. Like I said to charles above, all this "self preservation" bias works both ways.
P.S. Rightwinger: I gave you a lot more than one insightful, and frankly I would again. On this point, though, you are wrong, and the efforts that you and people like you undertake on the Internet defame yourself and your country, and serve the interests of evil people.
"I will agree with you on that point. But what can Bush or the next President really do? We can't act militarily because the U.N. and europe will have their fits, we can't round up terrorists individually because "people" don't want terrorists locked up in Gitmo. "
Let them throw fits, and kill at the very least self-confessed terrorists. We may not know where Osama is, but we know there are storefront offices for terrorist organizations in numerous Middle Eastern nations. If this is really a war on terror, and we know where there are terrorists, we should demand that the nation in question deal with them, or deal with them ourselves.
We are actually allowing Hamas to be a government faction in Palestine. Terrorists, walking around in daylight, giving speeches, and what are we doing? Nothing. That doesn't sound like a war on terror to me. If Israel wants to play patty cake with them, whatever, but they look like nice plump targets to me.
No surpise, though, Clinton invited terrorists to the White House. All a terrorist has to do is buy a suit and call himself a politician. So long as that is true, there is no war on terror.