and gid who attacks my spelling and at the same time doing his own misspelling of simply words.
No, I did NOT attack your spelling, danielost. I attacked GRAMMAR and SYNTAX. Again, you are misguided. The one who wrote the article criticizing your spelling was another individual entirely.
First, you lie when you say my writing is full of misspellings. I'll give you a couple of typos, no problem, but as a rule my spelling is pretty much on the level. I tend to prefer British spellings, which American spellcheckers do not like, but if you know your history, they were common spellings in the US until Teddy Roosevelt began a campaign to get rid of them (and, yes, I know..."danielost" and "spellcheckers" will show up as misspelled words in your spellchecker, but the former is your name, and the latter is a computer term).
Second, again, let's get back to the point. You made an assertion, I countered it and gave you a MOUNTAIN of evidence to support my position, you called me a liar and told me the government was hiding the "real" Constitution from Americans and would not POSSIBLY post that stuff on the Internet. How credible does that make you? Really? IN all this time, my conflict with you could have been resolved by your simply admitting you were wrong, which is not a difficult task.
You want to know why your posts don't get the attention they deserve, danielost? Because you don't engage in meaningful debate. When someone differs with you, SUPPORT your position, don't speak in generalities and unsupported assumptions. Learning involves discovery, even when it means discovery that you are wrong.
But you're only going to bother reading 5-6 words of this reply and will miss the entire point, so I've wasted enough words as it is.
