Nancy Pelosi All American Traitor

She gives sellouts a bad name

Besides her being a SanFranfreako Liberal, she managed to sell out not only America on her latest jaunt to the middle East, but managed to sellout Israel at the same time. This is just another demonstration of a politician {a couple of Republicans too} doing their best to not only marginalize President Bush, but to lend some credence to a country that is a known sponsor of terrorism {Hamas and Hezbollah come to mind}.

Is there no low the Democrats will stoop to to capture the White house in 2008?

I must admit there strategy is flawless so far, do nothing in congress except try to continue to Bash Bush, put his aids on trial for nothing, No law was broke dismissing the eight attorneys, they serve at the pleasure of the President, meaning he can fire them if his hair did not look right one morning, I find it amazing that no one said a word when Wild bill fired 92 Attorneys, where was big mouth Chuckie Shumer then? Where was Harry Reid calling for criminal investigations then?

I have not been watching much news as it just aggravates me to much, but this latest slap in the face to America by Pelosi was just to much for me to not say something.

Pelosi is speaker of the House, not an international diplomat, she carries no authority to do anything, she cannot make any agreements with any country. This was just one big Photo opportunity for Pelosi and she made the most of it, damn the fact she screwed Israel by telling a huge lie, Israel told her nothing about any peace overtures with Syria, yet there she was speaking not just for America, but for another country. Could it be Pelosi is not satisfied with being just the speaker of the House of representatives? but is seeking a higher office as Speaker for the entire world?

12,349 views 35 replies
Reply #2 Top
I don't understand how (or why) members of CONGRESS are making these diplomatic trips. What right does she have to speak for me? I never had the opportunity to not vote for her, so why does she get to go speak in my place?

This goes for any member of congress. Who paid for her trip? Was it the poor saps in her district? Or was it America? No congressman/woman should be making these diplomatic trips. None....
Reply #3 Top
Could it be Pelosi is not satisfied with being just the speaker of the House of representatives? but is seeking a higher office as Speaker for the entire world?


Maybe, just maybe she's the anti-christ...heh.

One of the nation's leading experts on Islam says (Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch) he believes Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is going to be "unpleasantly surprised" when she discovers that you can not negotiate with countries that harbor terrorists.

No congressman/woman should be making these diplomatic trips. None....


ya, I mean what authority does she have? None. She can't set policies. Does she think she is going to "save the day?"

The Dems still believe that if they give the right combination of concessions to various Islamic states and majority Muslim countries, they will find there will be peace -- and I think they're going to be unpleasantly surprised. Geeeesh I'm starting to think we're going to go back to giving "tributes" to these folks just like the "good ol' days."
Reply #4 Top
(Citizen)ShovelheatApril 5, 2007 17:57:57


Now here's my Elie! Glad to see ya back and raving, bro!


took to much out of me joe to do this again any time soon.

it's like my internal batteries are just charged enough to keep vital things moving and if I use energy for crap like this I just take away from me.
Reply #5 Top
(Citizen)MythicalMinoApril 5, 2007 18:15:52


I don't understand how (or why) members of CONGRESS are making these diplomatic trips. What right does she have to speak for me? I never had the opportunity to not vote for her, so why does she get to go speak in my place?

This goes for any member of congress. Who paid for her trip? Was it the poor saps in her district? Or was it America? No congressman/woman should be making these diplomatic trips. None....


My thoughts exactly, what makes it worse to me is she is the third most powerful person in Washington, if the president and vice-president get it in the neck she is the President of the United States.
Reply #6 Top
(Citizen)KFC Kickin For ChristApril 5, 2007 18:53:24


Maybe, just maybe she's the anti-christ...heh.


Now there is a scary thought.

ya, I mean what authority does she have? None. She can't set policies. Does she think she is going to "save the day?"


She cannot set anything such as treaties, open up negotiations between Syria and America, in other words she went to piss on America and the Presidency.
Reply #7 Top

Excellant!  Just damn excellant!

You have nailed it.  But dont expect any recognition from the left.  Sad really.  How many enemies did Newt pay homage to - and don a burka to do it?

(I know I am going to get crap for that Burka thing - but what the hey!).

Reply #8 Top
a) why not a word about he republicans who went to syria?
b) since when is an isreali politician the "voice of God?" the isreali prime minister is a politician too, remember... our politicians lie 100% of the time and theirs are honest 100% of the time? i don't think so.
Reply #9 Top

 

a) why not a word about he republicans who went to syria?

How many are speaker of the House? How many wore head coverings?

b) since when is an isreali politician the "voice of God?" the isreali prime minister is a politician too, remember... our politicians lie 100% of the time and theirs are honest 100% of the time? i don't think so.

Since when did anyone proclaim them such?

Reply #10 Top
(Citizen)Dr GuyApril 5, 2007 19:01:59Reply


Excellant! Just damn excellant!
You have nailed it. But dont expect any recognition from the left.


thank you doc, and I don't expect anything from the left but excuses or things like "how come you did not write an article about republicans that did it."
Reply #11 Top
(Citizen)Sean Conners aka SConn1April 5, 2007 19:02:24


a) why not a word about he republicans who went to syria?


I rest my case.. see above.. I have not been writing at all in case you have not noticed sean.

b) since when is an isreali politician the "voice of God?" the isreali prime minister is a politician too, remember... our politicians lie 100% of the time and theirs are honest 100% of the time? i don't think so.


Israel has been pretty steady about no chance for peace as long as {insert country} is sponsering terrorism.

Reply #12 Top
I dunno how I feel about it right now . . .

Mostly I just see someone trying to exhaust all venues to deal with a country before we do anything hasty. You know, that Weinberger Doctrine being what it is, after all . . .
Reply #13 Top
(Citizen)SanChoninoApril 5, 2007 19:43:04


I dunno how I feel about it right now . . .

Mostly I just see someone trying to exhaust all venues to deal with a country before we do anything hasty. You know, that Weinberger Doctrine being what it is, after all . . .


There is little or no chance there will be conflict with Syria. Besides Pelosi has no authority to do anything about anything concerning anything with another country in the first place, she has the same clout as Me going to Syria and talking to the President of Syria.
Reply #14 Top

Since when did anyone proclaim them such?


the assumption that she must be lying and the prime minister is being honest.

I rest my case.. see above.. I have not been writing at all in case you have not noticed sean.


yeah, pretty convenient to say that after i asked the question. i guess the real answer is that you are just interested in attacking democrats. act is tht somebody has to talk to those people, but as long as condi and the state dept are being whining lil girls about "talking to our enemies" as if that's a new and radical concept, i applaud both the republicans and democrats that have attempted to talk to syria in whatever capacity availible. be it official or non official. if you notice, i didn't ask about why you didn't criticize them, but i asked why no mention?

if you think that no one should ever go to speak to anyone from a foreign governmnet, then that's sine,,,just say so. i personally applaud both reps. and dems. for taking some sort of initiative.

but if you don't, at least be fair.

one nore note,,,i'm at a loss here...could someone point out to me in the Constitution where it says that no one except people in the seperate but equal part of the executive branch can speak to members of a foreign government?


Reply #15 Top
Did anyone stop to think that Bush probably asked her to go and also told her that he would attack her in the media because he had to?

The reason? Because by her going to Syria, Bush doesn't have to talk to either Iran or Syria officially but could convey a message to both Syria and Iran what would happen if the British soldiers were not released.

It isn't coincidence that she went, and the soldiers were released. Syria even admitted that they were partially responsible.

So traitor? No. Quietly doing her job as asked of her by Bush? Yes.
Reply #16 Top
Did anyone stop to think that Bush probably asked her to go and also told her that he would attack her in the media because he had to?


That's Machiavellian. But I dont see them keeping that a secret (Pelosi and Bush) if it is true.
Reply #17 Top
Like I said, any Senator or Representative from a state that I am not from, does not represent me. It doesn't matter to me if they are Republican, Democrat, or the man in the moon. I do not agree with Nancy Pelosi going over there for "diplomatic talks" in my name.

I did not have the opportunity to not vote for them, so they do not represent me in any capacity, especially in foreign affairs.
Reply #18 Top

Reply By: Sean Conners aka SConn1Posted: Thursday, April 05, 2007


Since when did anyone proclaim them such?


the assumption that she must be lying and the prime minister is being honest.


I rest my case.. see above.. I have not been writing at all in case you have not noticed sean.


yeah, pretty convenient to say that after i asked the question. i guess the real answer is that you are just interested in attacking democrats. act is tht somebody has to talk to those people, but as long as condi and the state dept are being whining lil girls about "talking to our enemies" as if that's a new and radical concept, i applaud both the republicans and democrats that have attempted to talk to syria in whatever capacity availible. be it official or non official. if you notice, i didn't ask about why you didn't criticize them, but i asked why no mention?

 

Seems like you are spoiling for a fight sean.. you will not get one here. let us agree to disagree.

Reply #19 Top

Reply By: John GaltPosted: Thursday, April 05, 2007
Did anyone stop to think that Bush probably asked her to go and also told her that he would attack her in the media because he had to?

The reason? Because by her going to Syria, Bush doesn't have to talk to either Iran or Syria officially but could convey a message to both Syria and Iran what would happen if the British soldiers were not released.

It isn't coincidence that she went, and the soldiers were released. Syria even admitted that they were partially responsible.

So traitor? No. Quietly doing her job as asked of her by Bush? Yes.

some diverse thought this. Could be,.. but would she be willing to make a target of herself?

Reply #20 Top
Reply By: little-whip
thanx for stopping by sabrina
Reply #21 Top
Seems like you are spoiling for a fight sean.. you will not get one here. let us agree to disagree.


that's ok with me. no need for either of us to get all riled up, lol...anyway, i stated my position more clearly here...WWW Link where someone is trying to hijack and fight, as if they mattered, lol...

take care elie...i can certainly respect a consistant position where no congressional members engage with foreign governments. i don't agree with it, but i understand it and respect it...as long as it's even handed.
Reply #22 Top
(Citizen)little-whipApril 6, 2007 16:36:52


will call Sunday.. happy Geezer to you too.
Reply #23 Top

a) why not a word about he republicans who went to syria?

b) since when is an isreali politician the "voice of God?" the isreali prime minister is a politician too, remember... our politicians lie 100% of the time and theirs are honest 100% of the time? i don't think so.



The answer is obviously when you're a Bush supporter!
Seriously, I'm not sure why this is such a big issue. Tt may be unusual for a speaker of the house to do this, but these are unusual times. There isn't anything in the constitution saying she can't, it's not like she's meeting with them to make a treaty or alliance or anything. In her view, she's probably trying to meet with them since she thinks the Bush admininstration never will. I'm not saying you're wrong, maybe it is out of place. I just think there are far more important issues facing the country than little old lady's trip to Syria, which others have done and no one would have heard about it if it wasn't reporte so much in the media.

Reply #24 Top
Hey, kiddo, did you hear about the Republicans that went to Syria before or at the same time as Speaker Pelosi (Rep. Robert Aderholt’s (R-AL), Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), and then Rep. David Hobson (R-OH) who actually accompanied Pelosi)? Where you mad when Newt Gingrich took a solo trip to China in 1997, or when he went to Israel in 1998?


Or are you just a partisan hack? Oh damn, why did I even ask the question? Of course you are!

Reply #25 Top
P.S. Laura Bush has also worn head coverings in Muslim countries -- let's talk shit about her now, ok?