"the moral issue of men with guns (the government) confiscating the property (income) that someone makes"
Again, are there no countries on Earth, where this government with guns comes to take your money away?
Maybe I don't see an issue with a government, which is really just a rules organization, keeping order or attempting to do so, within the confines of it's jurisdiction. See "Iraq" for a situation where it government doesn't happen.
Don't selectively quote. It's dishonest debating at its lowest.
Add the rest back: The issue is taking money from one individual to hand to another individual.
Do you grasp the difference? We aren't talking about money being used for roads or other "public" good but literally given to another individual in exchange for nothing.
If you don't know how to debate, don't participate. Your attempt to misrepresent what I wrote to being that I'm against taxation is disgusting and contemptible.
I wrote:
And if you don't see the moral issue of men with guns (the government) confiscating the property (income) that someone makes in order to hand it over to someone who has done nothing at all to earn it then perhaps it is you that should go to some banana republic.
and then you address:
"the moral issue of men with guns (the government) confiscating the property (income) that someone makes"
Completely changes what was being said.
It isn't like they don't confiscate a particularly painful part of my paycheck each week either Brad. Each individual dollar they take of mine is more valuable proportionally then each of yours.
It is you and others who categorize me that way, not I. I apologize for making you feel that I am smuggly morally superior.
Spoken as a true class warfare artist. Your property is not more valuable than my property or vice versa. We both earned it.
As for your final comment, no need to apologize. You are simply unworthy to participate on my blog.