Time to End Big Oil's Greed

Look at their 2006 net profits




The three largest integrated U.S. oil companies posted their 2006 Profits. These are the companies that Bush and the GOP gave $12 Billion of your money for more tax brakes. This is what they reported as their 2006 net earnings:

Exxon Mobile $39.5 Billion - up $3.4 Billion over 2005

Chevron $17.1 Billion – up $3.0 Billion over 2005

Conoco Phillips $15.5 Billion – up $2.0 Billion over 2005

These increases are outlandish and mean that every American paid too much for the gasoline and oil they needed to live. These oil companies did not just pass on the higher crude oil prices to consumers but used the instability in the oil producing areas to inflate their profits. It is time to pass an excess profits tax on oil companies that practice such irresponsible pricing policies to inflate their profits. That excess profits tax should be used to produce alternate energy sources to move our country closer to energy independence from foreign crude oil purchases.
19,965 views 54 replies
Reply #1 Top
Why? It's their money. You buy their product. If you want to stop buying it, find an alternative yourself. Why should they be asked to pay for people to find an alternative to their product? What law or founding principle are you basing that on?

Should Microsoft be charged extra to perfect Linux? You're a blatant socialist, Col, and further left than the vast majority of Dems in Congress. Can you still claim to be a moderate Republican and post communist bullshit like this?

Should companies that produce alcohol be forced to subsidize temperance movements? Should tobacco companies buy my nicotine patch? If you are addicted to oil, it's your fault.
Reply #2 Top
Bakerstreet

So long as we are running a deficit, every dollar the fed gives in tax cuts ADDS to that deficit that you and I must pay both the interest on the added debt and some day repay the principal. That is OUR money that Bush and the GOP is giving away. I do not recall Microsoft, being granted a $12 Billion Dollar tax credit!

This is PURE GREED for something that every person and every company can not do without!
Reply #3 Top
Col, why don't you just run for president?
Reply #4 Top
Col, this is pure socialism what you are advocating. Not much different than what Chavez is doing.
Reply #5 Top
IslandDog

This has nothing to do with socialism. The fact is that the oil industry is as far from free enterprise as you can get. A few oil companies control the market and competition does not function. They use this power to set prices and extract huge profits for something the public can not do without and for which there is no substitute. Competition has nothing to do with setting the prices. What I am suggesting is a counter balance to their power for something that is essential to our society.
Reply #6 Top
Bullshit, frankly. You aren't posing the idea that the prices be fixed so that the money stays with us. You're suggesting a TAX on those extra profits, so that our money goes to your socialist GOVERNMENT to waste on the pretense of the greater good.
Reply #7 Top
Bakerstreet

You do not know what you are talking about. This is NOTHING to do with socialism. The fact is that the Oil industry is not operating so competition works to control prices. First there was no reason to have granted $12 Billion in tax cuts to this industry. Second, the increased profits clearly show that the oil companies have used the higher crude oil prices to increase their profits. HOW IS THAT JUSTIFIED? That has caused the cost of essential and unavoidable expenditures for EVERY person and business to be higher just so the oil companies can FATTEN the pocket books. ONLY the oil executives and those that receive increased dividends benefit from the increased profits that we all are paying for. Since the oil companies have PROVEN they are acting to the detriment of EVERY person and company, it is time to take away their unjustified tax cuts and when their pricing policies increase the cost above their actual cost increases tax away that unjustified increased profit that results and help and use it to construct alternate energy production. That will benefit ALL Americans with the unjustified greed of BIG OIL!
Reply #8 Top
When I deposited my yearly bonus Gene, I laughed all the way to the bank knowing that you sufffered at the pump for my fat check.
Reply #9 Top
Just john

It is not just me but EVERY American that is paying higher prices for gasoline and heating oil to satisfy the GREED of people like you. You are giving the finger to all Americans and All American Businesses. What an ASS you and others are that support the unjust policies of President George W. Bush!
Reply #10 Top
It is not just me [/quote]

Yeah, but it's just you that I was laughing about.

[quote]What an ASS you and others are


I'd rather be an ass than a deranged old fool.

Were you whining for those oil and gas companies in the 80's when the industry nearly went bust? What about all of the people who lost their livelyhood that are finally getting some sort of retirement due to the current boom? Do you care about the people of the industry or are you just going to bitch about the bottom line?
Reply #11 Top
One more thing oh great king of the tuck tail and run crowd...

Respond to my comments or are you out of lies to tell?

Chicken?
Reply #12 Top
This has nothing to do with socialism. The fact is that the oil industry is as far from free enterprise as you can get.


It has much to do with socialism.  Oil companies are a business, and you are wanting to take away their profits because you don't like "big oil".
Reply #13 Top
https://forums.joeuser.com/?forumid=34&aid=142849

So I assume you will be supporting Hillary.
Reply #14 Top

Ah, Math.

Big numbers always impress dumb people.

"Exxon Mobile $39.5 Billion - up $3.4 Billion over 2005"

And...?

What was Exxon's Gross?

answer: $378 BILLION.

Go ahead, do the math. Take one and divide it by the other.

Exxon's Net revenue was barely over 10% -- in a year in which gas prices shot up.

In most industries, a healthy company should be generating approximately 15% in profit. Historically, that was the number used to determine a "fair profit". "cost plus" or what have.

But to the statistically impaired, like Col Gene, who just sees lots of numbers he doesn't understand, he just sees $39 billion.

Let's look at Microsoft for a comparison:

For its fiscal first quarter, which ended Sept. 30, the company announced a profit of $2.9 billion, up from $2.6 billion. Revenue was $9.2 billion, up from $8.2 billion.

That's $2.9 billion profit out of $9.2 billion grossed. That's around a 30% profit margin!

But $2.9 billion isn't as big a number and doesn't make people like Col Gene freak out as much even though Microsoft's profit margin is gigantic.

So explain, Col Gene. How exactly is Exxon being greedy? Because they make a lot of money? Is that what greed is to the economically challenged?

If Exxon made $1 trillion a year with a profit margin of only 3% (i.e. basically break even) that would still be $30 billion. Is that greedy still?

 

Reply #15 Top
"You do not know what you are talking about. This is NOTHING to do with socialism."


You can put as many exclaimation points as you like, but it doesn't cover the fact that you are trying to shift money from private industry to the government on the pretense that it is "good" for us.

  • Not caring that it will raise the price of energy
  • Not caring that it will effect one of our large national employers with a spillover effect to related industries.
  • Not caring that it places American oil and gas companies in an uncompetitive position with state-owned companies from the Middle East and South America.


If you say this isn't about socialism you're a liar. You're not that self-deluded, you're just trying to cover your propaganda. You are espousing the idea that we should take money away from private industry to punish them for being too successful. If we can't stomach the product or the price, we can buy vehicles that use less, or look for complete alternatives.
Reply #16 Top
Just john

It is not just me but EVERY American that is paying higher prices for gasoline and heating oil to satisfy the GREED of people like you. You are giving the finger to all Americans and All American Businesses. What an ASS you and others are that support the unjust policies of President George W. Bush!


Again I call bullsh*t! Gas here in Pittsburgh is running from $2.05 at Sheetz to $2.15 at SUNOCO! Now explain how that's a "higher" price? BTW, if you like, I can provide pictures of their signs for you. So now who's giving the finger to who? You are our resident ASS!

And just for the "record"....YOUR point has everything to do with socialism!
Reply #17 Top
What I am suggesting is offsetting the power of Big Oil to redirect the outrageous profits they have extracted from all of us with the monopoly like power they possess. Let's put it to a vote. I bet my position will win hands down! After all this is a democracy!
Reply #18 Top
" What I am suggesting is offsetting the power of Big Oil to redirect the outrageous profits they have extracted from all of us with the monopoly like power they possess. "


Redirect them to the government.
Reply #19 Top
What I am suggesting is offsetting the power of Big Oil to redirect the outrageous profits they have extracted from all of us with the monopoly like power they possess. Let's put it to a vote. I bet my position will win hands down! After all this is a democracy!


LOL.

So we should have a vote and decide how what should be done with the profit a business makes? 
Reply #20 Top
Bakerstreet “Redirect them to the government”

No redirecting them back to the people that they were taken from - you and me. My suggestion would have the government use those unjustified profits to benefit all of us by creating alternate energy sources. While the work was being accomplished with the money redirected from Big Oil, People doing the work and making the equipment would be working. The companies hired by the Fed would be making profits. In the end we end up with added energy that is under OUR control. That is what I am suggesting and it is a lot better than allowing a few fat cats to stuff their bank accounts with the blood money they took from all of us!

IslandDog

That vote was taken in November 2006 and YOU LOOSE!
Reply #21 Top
Socialism plain and simple. The government forcibly takes the profits from a company for the "greater good". There is nothing about it that is not socialism.

Brad beat me to the remedial math lesson, so I won't repeat it. How can you possibly claim excessive profits on such a small profit margin? Do you have even a rudimentary understanding of economics?

Sell your car and go buy a bicycle if you want to make a statement against the oil companies.
Reply #22 Top
"No redirecting them back to the people that they were taken from - you and me. My suggestion would have the government use those unjustified profits to benefit all of us by creating alternate energy sources."


So I guess I was... wrong?

"You can put as many exclaimation points as you like, but it doesn't cover the fact that you are trying to shift money from private industry to the government on the pretense that it is "good" for us."


If you wanted to put the money in our pockets you'd suggest something like government price caps on gasoline and petroleum products. You'd at least offer something that keeps the money in our pockets. Instead we pay just as much, only more of the money goes to the government.

Oh, but then we'll be paying MORE won't we, because inevitably when you raise taxes on the oil companies they'll just raise their prices. Why not just come out of the closet and admit you are way more a fan of Chavez than of capitalism.
Reply #23 Top

That vote was taken in November 2006 and YOU LOOSE!


That "vote" had nothing to do with "big oil" col.
Reply #24 Top
Indeed and unfortunately, Communism wasn't on the balot.
Reply #25 Top
The Vote in November 2006 had to do with ALL the Bush/GOP policies which the majority DOES NOT WANT! If you think the public is happy when they see the obscene profits by Big Oil and know it is because they are paying too much for the gas they need, think again.
My suggestions are not Communism. The reality you ignore is that Big Oil is not free enterprise and competition. It is an example how an industry that produces an essential product has consolidated power to control the market not be controlled by it. They create supply problems and then exploit the public with increased prices. They use the increase in Crude Oil prices to not only recover their ADDED cost but than add another Layer to increase their own profits. They receive tax cuts that increase the national debt and for WHAT? Helping an industry that is in trouble like Chrysler in the 1980's is one thing. Going into debt to give industry money that is increasing their profits at the expense of EVERY American is another issue. Bush and the GOP have put our country further into debt so he can reward companies that overcharge the same tax payers that will pay the added interest and repay the debt added from the tax cuts to big oil. The term I have for the is "WRONG!!!!!"