| It may be better if people don't know anything about the writer |
that is a rather safe position to assume. but i have stated before, and will say it again, that depending on what kind of writing you do, it can be a detriment.
if you are writing fiction or about things that aren't personal or that no personal views are expressed, then an alias is no distraction. and yes, at times , may help.
i believe that if you are reporting however, or if you are writing non fiction and in that case some personal opinions will come into play, then credibility comes into play. and putting your name behind it carries weight. also, doing it annonymously, to me, diminishes the credibility.
that is why i use my real name.
now some will put up "what about the lunatics" protests...which are legitimate. but all professional journalists put their name on their work, a few may use pseudonyms but they are the exception.
i have been writing online since the early 90's under my own name, and longer offline, or in ways that i don't hide who i am where only "screennames" are allowed. i don't claim that this gives me an aura of credibility or infallibility, but it does let the reader know that i am willing to stand behind my words fearlessly. that i am not just spouting off crap
just to infuriate people.
i have been approached about my writings in my life, but i've never had an unmanageable problem or had my life threatened in any meaningful way. most times, the reader comes away with a better understanding of my thoughts than any blog would allow in it's context driven limitations. and i've made a few friends over the years too.
but that's my way, my perrogative and it has served me well. others make their own determinations, rationalizations and justifications and hopefully they serve them as well.