Moderateman Moderateman

Democrats Sold Out American Military once, happening again?

Democrats Sold Out American Military once, happening again?

Date 1975, President Gerald R. Ford Asks a heavily controlled Democratic congress for 380 million dollars to help the South Vietnamese fend off the push by the North Vietnamese to control all of Vietnam.

This happened right after the resignation of Richard Nixon and the Democrats took power in a big way in both the Senate and the House of Representatives. Right after President Ford pardoned Nixon. The amount of outrage from the Democrats aimed at Ford for pardoning Nixon was off the scale, Ted Kennedy lambasted Ford for doing so, but in recent years admitted it was the best thing Ford could have done for the country at the time. Most people agree that pardoning Nixon was the right thing to do at the time, so the country could begin the healing process.

Anyways the Democrats refused to even hear the bill For money Ford was trying to get passed, they refused to even hear about it, let alone vote on it. In a few weeks due to the Democrats treachery South Vietnam fell and over 2 and 1/2 million people were "purged" or jailed by the "benevolent" northern communist Vietnamese.

Could the Democrats sell the Iraqis out the same way? I think they could and would if the opportunity presented itself. After all the talk from the left about redeployment and cutting and running I could very easily see the democrat controlled congress refusing to allow any money to continue to fight the war on terror after all there track record is to sell out those they no longer need or those that have become a liability.

12,834 views 32 replies
Reply #26 Top
because a democrat only had a few "advisors" and Observors" in vietnam it does not count as getting involved?


even if--as i'm sure he'll attempt to claim--by 'getting us in it' drguy meant getting involved (or some other equally too-vague characterization), neither north nor south vietnam existed prior to 1954.

ergo, no war for anyone to get us into until then.
Reply #27 Top
Guess you should read it then since you are arguing out of both sides of your mouth with that statement alone. Nice try at a definite maybe!


clearly there'll have to be a prerequisite just for you. the big golden book of important historical dates.

Reply #28 Top
clearly there'll have to be a prerequisite just for you. the big golden book of important historical dates.


Dates dont matter, nor does english to you. You are going to equivocate to absolve your clowns of blame regardless of dates or actions. No point in arguing with one so inured in their sides propaganda, that they cannot see the truth. But then, facts never were your strong point, only talking points.
Reply #30 Top
Hi ya MM! How was your new year? My Appologies. 07 is a lucky number so I hope it is for you as well. Have a great one!
Reply #31 Top
*feeds the troll*


(Citizen)jennifer1January 1, 2007 08:10:48

this is my article, so you are feeding me, I hope you do not think I am a troll.

Reply #32 Top
Please whip and docguy, take your thing somewhere else please, I love whip and like doc and hate to see this happening on my blog.