Silent Poet seems incapable of dealing with generalities.
That's why in the real world -- leaders almost always are conservatives. Regardless of the field -- even politics.
The reason why liberals can't get things done, even when they hold majorities, is that there are so few leaders amonst them.
Leadership requires being able to make generalizations and then dealing with the consequences of those generalizations.
There's nothing wrong with not being a leader. Most people aren't. But liberals get angry because they want their agenda to move forward but don't understand why they consistently fail to move their agenda forward.
Once in awhile, a strong liberal leader will come forward and implement that agenda (LBJ comes to mind) and the rest of us are stuck living with the consequences for their disaster (how much has that war on poverty cost?).
Anyway, the point being, liberals believe their life view will make the world a better place but are largely incapable of doing anythign to actually achieve their objectives. That constant failure becomes frustrating and so they're angry.
The best liberals tend to be able to do is become journalists and then complain about what *other* people should be doing or shouldn't be doing.
