Is Adult ADD For Real?
An analysis of the US News And World Report article
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/040426/health/26add.htm
from
JoeUser Forums
The nurse practitioner at work flagged me down yesterday to tell me of the recent article in the US News And World Report about ADD in Adults. I haven't seen the print version yet, and I presume (perhaps incorrectly) that the web version is verbatim the same. The article can be read online here.
My prior memories of the USNAWR magazine were from High School and College, where I used it to research information for debates, research papers, and the like. I am unaware of what academic standing the magazine enjoys, or even whether the magazine leans left or right. If you have opinions about the magazine itself (and not this article), please feel free to reply and let me know.
The article in question is recent and relevant to this blog. Already in the brief lifespan of this blog, there has been debate as to whether ADD is a physiological problem or a psychological problem. Is ADD a treatable disorder and a physicial malfunction within the body that can be treated or coped with, or are people who claim to have ADD merely lazy, disorganized, and unwilling to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings? In "Driven To Distraction" Marianne Szegedy-Maszak leans towards the physiological point of view. She reveals the statistics that over 7 million children are "diagnosed" with ADD, and that nearly half of children with ADD never grow out of it. ADD is also the most diagnosed psychiatric disorder in children in the United States.
The number of children with ADD is so large that is almost offensive. With so many children being affected, how can we call this a disorder? Instead it should just be a fact of life -- some children are argumentative, hyperactive, and distractable. There are just kids for crying out loud. Right? It is this attitude that causes the general public to look poorly on adults who claim to have ADD. Unfortunately, while Szegedy-Maszak goes far in explaining ADD and it's effects on children, she only anecdotally explains the relevance to adults.
In stating the condition in the way that she has, Szegedy-Maszak has only further fueled the suspicion that the public has towards ADD and the treatments involved. There already is a large backlash against stimulant treatment in children, even though this treatment is shown to be effective.
Szegedy-Maszak does finally end the article with a positive message, that ADD sometimes brings blessings with it instead of just curses. Quick wit, high energy, and the ability to make associative leaps are all know ADD characteristics.
But don't just take my word for it. Read the article and decide for yourself. And then comment
My prior memories of the USNAWR magazine were from High School and College, where I used it to research information for debates, research papers, and the like. I am unaware of what academic standing the magazine enjoys, or even whether the magazine leans left or right. If you have opinions about the magazine itself (and not this article), please feel free to reply and let me know.
The article in question is recent and relevant to this blog. Already in the brief lifespan of this blog, there has been debate as to whether ADD is a physiological problem or a psychological problem. Is ADD a treatable disorder and a physicial malfunction within the body that can be treated or coped with, or are people who claim to have ADD merely lazy, disorganized, and unwilling to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings? In "Driven To Distraction" Marianne Szegedy-Maszak leans towards the physiological point of view. She reveals the statistics that over 7 million children are "diagnosed" with ADD, and that nearly half of children with ADD never grow out of it. ADD is also the most diagnosed psychiatric disorder in children in the United States.
The number of children with ADD is so large that is almost offensive. With so many children being affected, how can we call this a disorder? Instead it should just be a fact of life -- some children are argumentative, hyperactive, and distractable. There are just kids for crying out loud. Right? It is this attitude that causes the general public to look poorly on adults who claim to have ADD. Unfortunately, while Szegedy-Maszak goes far in explaining ADD and it's effects on children, she only anecdotally explains the relevance to adults.
In stating the condition in the way that she has, Szegedy-Maszak has only further fueled the suspicion that the public has towards ADD and the treatments involved. There already is a large backlash against stimulant treatment in children, even though this treatment is shown to be effective.
Szegedy-Maszak does finally end the article with a positive message, that ADD sometimes brings blessings with it instead of just curses. Quick wit, high energy, and the ability to make associative leaps are all know ADD characteristics.
But don't just take my word for it. Read the article and decide for yourself. And then comment