Pity.
But the biggest pity is that you're right. Sony will win the day again.
| Depressing that it cost such large amounts of cash for something that isn't noticeably better. |
I think what bugs me the most about Sony in all of this is their horribly superior attitude. Them stating that "the next generation begins when we (Sony) say it does" just rubs me wrong.
Honestly, the little bit of me that is an admitted fanboy really wants the 360 to walk all over the PS3, but there is no way that will happen.
| Honestly, the little bit of me that is an admitted fanboy really wants the 360 to walk all over the PS3, but there is no way that will happen. |
Ah, showing your true colors. I will , however, be interested to see the reaction to the new Nintendo console. It seems very . . . different. I don´t know how well it´s going to go over . . . I guess we´ll have to wait and see.
| It seems very . . . different. I don´t know how well it´s going to go over . . . I guess we´ll have to wait and see. |
I saw some gameplay video of the next Zelda game, and it looked very awkward to me. But who knows. At least Nintendo is trying to innovate.
I want to play the Soul Calibur series of games on my PC. I know that's selfish, but there it is.
| Honestly, the little bit of me that is an admitted fanboy really wants the 360 to walk all over the PS3, but there is no way that will happen. |
I agree, but I think that there is a decent chance that the Wii might beat the PS3. For one thing, while the 360 won't succeed in Japan, Nintendo is already a huge player over there in the handheld market and it shouldn't be that hard for them to translate that into success in the console area. It helps that the new Zelda game looks a heck of a lot better than anything the PS3 has.
I'll be keeping tracks until the price drops and the console has a considerable library of good games. I'm not done with my PS2 yet anyway.
I wouldn't mind playing an XBox for comparison, though.
Sure, I own a GBA (love it), but xbox never really appealed to me (for reasons that are invalid in this post).
I've read about the PS3 launch shortage, but haven't read it from a credible source - i.e. bbc's world service news (which, btw, I'm probably going to check after I write this - go fig
) - mostly it's been just bashing, and apparently after w/e happened to the consumer market, hate sells t_t.It seems the more other people hate it, the more the PS3 will sell to them, etc., etc.
Yes, I agree it isn't very good logic, but have you seen some of the ways in which MMORPG's are handled day to day? You / I are hard pressed to find someone who is willing to be decent or just help out for the sheer joy of it
.These are the people that are spoiled and get what they want, I argue
..Truth to tell, this is a semi-defense of the PS3, I agree, but only from one of the few people who Are, or at least try to be, decent on games and life
.Xbox is not at stake. The Japanese and Asian market is
. Nintendo has always done sleeper-well, even with the N64 and "Superman (Returns)" w/e. Sony has always been a big hitter, but the countless bashing Sony and sometimes Nintendo gets seems to come from an American audience, and thus to me, an arrogant audience who have relied on someone for the past 6 years to Be arrogant and to get our way (Dubya)...and to me, the sad thing is, it's worked.So, in short, with Bush as role model (and votes not checked yet, altough I have voted this past day - go me!
), this country (America) has gone down the tubes, IMO.*tangent catcher*
so, before you say "I, as a hardcore gamer from yester-year" am ignorant on the fact that the PS3 is failing, look at a lot of launch titles/systems....not many of them made it then, either.
I am no longer hopeful or content to watch this "escapade" unfold as November 17th enter - I am confident.
Confident that this BS I keep hearing about it will subside once people realize how much of an *expletive deleted* they've been to other people's chosen system.
As I've said, sony is not my one and only. In fact, sony was never around when I was a kid, so I can safely (albeit, also arrogantly (rofl!) ) say that I am not loyal to them in the monetary or fan-boy sense. I just look for a good system, ignore the hate against it (which, I argue, is not ignorance, but a secular faith in new technology
), and make my own decisions (Shock and Awe!, no? ).I close with this: if we, as Americans, Aren't the "fantastical" (fantasy-ized) "borg", why do we act like it?
-Joren T. cole
This attitude has dominated their corporation for as long as I can remember. Remember the VHS and Betamax wars. Although Sony's Betamax was far superior in terms of picture and sound they ended up losing to VHS because Sony refused to license to 3rd parties. They wanted to be the only ones you could buy a betamax player, and then everybody saw the writing on the wall that they would charge huge licensing fees to content providers as well.
Ironically, this is the same reason why they will lose the looming blue-ray HD-DVD war too. Even though, like the betamax, blue-ray is arguably better in terms of technological potential, it appears as if Sony has no interest in sharing blue-ray with 3rd parties. So basically, it is "rinse and repeat" with Sony ever 20 years and they will constantly loose because of a arrogant corporate attitude.
This is apparent in everything they do. Rather than listening to players and making concessions they continue to watch their most popular game, EverCrack, lose market share to WoW. It was also apparent when they shipped music CD's that, when played on pc, installed intrusive spyware on everybody's computer.
The problem with game counsels is that it is basically 2 major corporations with tons of cash (Microsoft and Sony) that thinks they can win the consol war with marketing. I understand that the 14-28 year old demographic is fickle, constantly moving on to whatever is the new sexy thing, but you're not going to hold that demographic that way.
Folks, do you honestly think that production delays are unintentional? Trust me, the small number release is very intentional. Though you act outraged over the 600$ price tag you know people as well as I do that will spend that money on the PS3. After all, what's a PS3 other than a PC made just to game, and how much does a decent gaming computer cost? The pricing is very intentional. Just like the 360. How long has the 360 been out? What's the price now? About the same as release. Limited supply and high demand.
As soon as a consumer sees one in a tv advert they instantly "get it" (meaning that they "understand how it works").
Virtual Tennis, Golf etc - just use the controller like a bat/club/lightsabre or whatever. This appeals to all age groups.
The Wii is cheaper than the Sony, and it has a H-U-G-E wow factor - motion sensitive gameplay.
I can't think of a console that has ever been released with such a huge improvement over anything that has gone before it.
Quite frankly I would pay MORE for the Wii than for the PS3 as it offers fun game play. Yet the Wii is going to be cheaper.
The Wii also looks like it will be FUN to play its games - and Nintendo have a reputation of making amazingly good games.
Wii lets you play the console and forces you to exercise at the same time - how cool is that? Sign me up!
Wii also appeals to people like me - GalCiv2 is the only game I play and I've not owned a console since the Snes - I "grew out" of it. Yet I'm strongly considering buying a Wii and probably will.
PS3 = the usual typical 3-year improvement in graphics.
Xbox = the usual typical 3-year improvement in graphics.
Wii = a revloution in gameplay.
Warriorinformer: I agree 100%. Sony has been demonstrating their arrogance and incompetence for years. They have been pushing proprietary formats for decades now, Betamx, Minidisc, Memory stick, Blue-Ray, heck, even their own format for digital media. Stupid.
Birney: I agree that the Wii is doing something new. It looks interesting to me, but I will withhold judgment until I get a chance to play. Watching videos, it looks a little akward. Time will tell, but at least Nintendo is trying something new.
| With a $600 pricetag (that's before any games)I'm not too sure PS3 will be a success. Who knows; this may end up help out PC gaming. |
One would think that, but I just have this gut feeling that it will still be a smash.
Chiprj: it totally freaks me out as well. Creeeeeepy.
Two Words:
Nintendo Wii controller = Power Glove...
| Nintendo Wii controller = Power Glove... |
YES! I agree completely. I think it is cool, it is unique, it is innovative, but I just am not sure it will catch on.
| With a $600 pricetag (that's before any games)I'm not too sure PS3 will be a success. Who knows; this may end up help out PC gaming. |
I read somewhere that the difference in price between the PS3 and the XBox 360 is two years of online/live gaming with the systems (which PS3 throws in for free?), which would even out before the next next-gen system comes out from either company. Pay it up front or pay it over time, I guess. Of course, with 360, it works out to much cheaper if you don't play online.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
- Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
- Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
- Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
- It's simple, and FREE!