Moderateman Moderateman

Hanoijohn Kerry.. He does it again

▼

Hanoijohn Kerry.. He does it again

Hanoijohn the Gift that just keeps giving!

from JoeUser Forums

I am sure by now some of you have either heard or read about HanoiJohns latest boo-boo.

Quote: Basically is "if you do not do well in school, you will get stuck in Iraq"

Just more proof of how much the far left hates the Military and her heroes.

Then to top it all of he gets on Television with feigned outrage, saying he was talking about the President. Far as I know the president did well in school and has a job.

Who does this traitorous moron Kerry think he is talking to?

Does he think the average American is stupid? That we cannot see the fake outrage? That somehow we cannot tell EXACTLY who he was addressing?

Hanoijohn is a disgrace to anyone that ever fought in a war... he dishonors the war dead from every war.

His "good friend" John McCain has asked him to apologize, but HANOIJOHN will not , cannot take his words back! I imagine that the left wing cringes every time Kerry opens his foul disgusting anti-American mouth.

21,579 views 57 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
I put this all down to jealousy tinged with madness. Kerry left Vietnam highly decorated and has had a successful career in politics. All Mod did was get bitter and go insane.
Cheers.


You should go do a little checking on Kerry's actions after Vietnam, before you start down that road. Like this:


Anti-war activism (1970–1971)

Kerry co-authored the book The New Soldier with the VVAW.After returning to the United States, Kerry joined the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW). Then numbering about 20,000 [20], VVAW was considered by some (including the administration of President Richard Nixon) to be an effective component of the antiwar movement. VVAW's members, including Kerry, could speak with personal knowledge about what they had seen in Vietnam. Beyond such specifics, however, they were seen as having "paid their dues" in Vietnam, and therefore being entitled to at least a respectful hearing. Americans who opposed the war were grateful for VVAW's work. Many Vietnam veterans saw the organization as giving voice to the views of the common soldier in exposing official deceit. Many other veterans, however, such as those who in 2004 formed Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, deeply resented the VVAW's activities, feeling that their own military service was being attacked or cheapened.

In a Harvard Crimson interview, dated February 18, 1970, [21]Kerry expounds on his view of how an immediate retreat would impact SE Asia:

Immediate withdrawal from Vietnam, Kerry said, would take about seven months due to complex logistics problems. During that interval he would allow only "self-defense return of fire." "Logistic support is now what Nixon is talking about leaving there and I don't want to see that. I don't think we should leave support troops there and I don't think we should give Vietnam any more than the foreign aid given any other one country." He does not feel there would be a massive slaughter of American, sympathizers once the United States pulled out.

"There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50 calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions and all of this is ordered as a matter of written established policy by the government of the United States from the top down. And I believe that the men who designed these, the men who designed the free fire zone, the men who ordered us, the men who signed off the air raid strike areas, I think these men, by the letter of the law, the same letter of the law that tried Lieutenant Calley, are war criminals."

I'd like to know "just how" he saw and did all this while being assigned to "river patrol boats"?

Or this bit of treason:

Kerry spoke of meeting negotiators on Vietnam
By Michael Kranish and Patrick Healy, Globe Staff | March 25, 2004

WASHINGTON -- In a question-and-answer session before a Senate committee in 1971, John F. Kerry, who was a leading antiwar activist at the time, asserted that 200,000 Vietnamese per year were being "murdered by the United States of America" and said he had gone to Paris and "talked with both delegations at the peace talks" and met with communist representatives.

Kerry, now the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, yesterday confirmed through a spokesman that he did go to Paris and talked privately with a leading communist representative. But the spokesman played down the extent of Kerry's role and said Kerry did not engage in negotiations.

Asked about the appropriateness of Kerry's saying that the United States had "murdered" 200,000 Vietnamese annually when the United States was at war, Kerry spokesman Michael Meehan said "Senator Kerry used a word he deems inappropriate."




And this being said and done while still an officer in the USN. So jealosy tinged with madness??? I think not.
Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top
Hello!

6 years with Bush.And then You asked if the average American is stupid.

DeskScapes - Bring your desktop background to life.
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
MyrranderNovember 3, 2006 15:08:35


put this all down to jealousy tinged with madness. Kerry left Vietnam highly decorated and has had a successful career in politics. All Mod did was get bitter and go insane.
Cheers.


wow myrr, did you stay up all night thinking about this?
deep... now go kiss your wife shitcon1.
Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top
lets see now, I retired at 50 after selling not one but two successful businesses.
I own my own home, not the bank , me.

I have a beach house I rarely visit.

All bills are paid.,
No credit card debt.

Yep sound like a failure to me.

Plus I know many many vets that never once talk about 'ALL THE MEDALS THEY EARNED"
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
(Citizen)drmilerNovember 5, 2006 23:50:48


THANK YOU DOC, BUT YOU KNOW MYRR, AFTER HE HAS BEEN HUFFING ALOT, HE JUIST GETS MEAN.
Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top
How about weird Al Jankowich as president.I mean if you cant beat them eat them.
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: mistelpyk(Anonymous User)Posted: Thursday, November 09, 2006
How about weird Al Jankowich as president.I mean if you cant beat them eat them.

works for me anyone but hillary or hanoijohn

Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top
lets see now, I retired at 50 after selling not one but two successful businesses.
I own my own home, not the bank , me.

I have a beach house I rarely visit.

All bills are paid.,
No credit card debt.

Yep sound like a failure to me.

---Modman

Yeah, but you're a Jew.      

weird Al Jankowich


It's Weird Al YANKOVICH.
Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
Kerry left Vietnam highly decorated and has had a successful career in politics.


While still holding a U.S. Naval Commission, Kerry met with enemy Generals in Paris. This is a capital crime.

Kerry owes his entire political career to the fact he used his war crimes (which he freely admitted to committing) as a political tool. The hypocrite has the nerve to call for the heads of troops in Iraq for war crimes, yet he owes his entire political career to bragging about his own.

He shouldn't be running for anything, he should be tried for treason.
Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top
While still holding a U.S. Naval Commission, Kerry met with enemy Generals in Paris. This is a capital crime.


What was the date? What are the names of the ennemy generals? I just went over Kerry's bio on wiki, and there is no mention about it.
Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top
What was the date? What are the names of the enemy generals? I just went over Kerry's bio on Viki, and there is no mention about it.


It was:


July 22, 1971, three weeks after the Paris talks, Kerry called on President Nixon to accept the plan at a press conference in which he surrounded himself with the families of POW's, a strategy outlined in the first document.




The first documentary evidence that Vietnamese communists were directly steering John Kerry's group Vietnam Veterans Against the War has been discovered in a U.S. archive, according to a researcher who spoke with Wontedly.


John Kerry testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1971.

One freshly unearthed document, captured by the U.S. from Vietnamese communists in 1971 and later translated, indicates the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese delegations to the Paris peace talks that year were used as the communications link to direct the activities of Kerry and other antiwar activists who attended.

Kerry insists he attended the talks only because he happened to be in France on his honeymoon and maintains he met with both sides. But previously revealed records indicate the future senator made two, and possibly three, trips to Paris to meet with Viet Cong leader Madame Nguyen Thi Binh then promote her plan's demand for U.S. surrender.


Link

And just an FYI....wiki doesn't always have all the info you might be looking for. Try a google search using "john Kerry vietnamese officials". MM doesn't call him "hanoijohn" for nothing.
Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top
thnx drmiler.
Reply #38 from JoeUser Forums Top
Can you source me a website that isn't so.. one-sided?

WorldNetDaily seems to be a christian-powerhouse-mega-conservative propaganda website. Just after reading a few of their adds and headlines.
Reply #39 from JoeUser Forums Top
Can you source me a website that isn't so.. one-sided?

WorldNetDaily seems to be a Christian-powerhouse-mega-conservative propaganda website. Just after reading a few of their adds and headlines.


Try this instead. And it wasn't being one-sided. Evidentially you didn't go to "any" of the links on the page. The links go to factual documents about kerry's doings.

Link

Or this:

Link

If it's documentation you want try these, they are all government documents:


Link

Link

Link

Link


What he did was "well" documented! What we can't figure is "how" the US failed to prosecute him!
Another point to consider....you won't see "any" of this on a major media site. They have been sweeping this under the rug for awhile.
Reply #40 from JoeUser Forums Top
Another point to consider....you won't see "any" of this on a major media site. They have been sweeping this under the rug for awhile


any idea why? Especially a republican powerhouse such a FoxNews would keep this under the rug, while there are clear evidence?

Were there any good that came out of Kerry's encounters with these generals? Such as the end of the Vietnam war?
Reply #41 from JoeUser Forums Top
Were there any good that came out of Kerry's encounters with these generals? Such as the end of the Vietnam war?


Makes no difference, pro "or" con. It was against the law. He was "still" an officer in the US Navy and what he did was against regulations. And on top of all that he gave up his brothers-in-arms! By portraying them as cowards, murders, rapists and the like.

any idea why? Especially a republican powerhouse such a FoxNews would keep this under the rug, while there are clear evidence?


Fox "did" bring it out, during the 2004 elections. Just who do you think gave the "Swift Boat Vets" all the TV air time? It most certainly was not ABC, NBC or CBS that much is certain.

But did you notice how fast "everything" disappeared "after" the elections?
Reply #42 from JoeUser Forums Top
Makes no difference, pro "or" con. It was against the law. He was "still" an officer in the US Navy and what he did was against regulations. And on top of all that he gave up his brothers-in-arms! By portraying them as cowards, murders, rapists and the like.


Indeed. The Law should always be followed blindly, not caring of the consequences.

This is a man who, indeed, violated the law for the greater good: to stop the slaughter. If the White House was to stuck up to negociate, he risked prison to do the right thing. That was probably one of the most apolitical act I've seen in my books.

I would applaude anyone meeting with Bin Laden (or any other terrorist/dictator leadership) today that would lead to the end of hostilities, even if such act was illegal.
Reply #43 from JoeUser Forums Top
hahahahahahahahahahahhhhhahhh

and that is all i have to say about Cikomyr
Reply #44 from JoeUser Forums Top
Well, I did not said it was possible. The nature of Bin Laden's antagonism toward us is, by its very nature, impossible to reason.

But if there was hope to make America, the Occident et al safer by going to sit and talk with these extremists, would it be wrong to consider it?

Or you prefer to keep your pride, and getting more american soldiers killed on a regular basis? More civilians murdered by both sides?
Reply #45 from JoeUser Forums Top
Indeed. The Law should always be followed blindly, not caring of the consequences.

This is a man who, indeed, violated the law for the greater good: to stop the slaughter. If the White House was to stuck up to negociate, he risked prison to do the right thing. That was probably one of the most apolitical act I've seen in my books.


And just for "your" edification....what kerry did is considered treason and as such is more than just against the law. Also what he did in NO way, help to end the conflict in Vietnam. And as a side question....how did what he said about his fellow soldiers have anything to do with ending the war?
Reply #46 from JoeUser Forums Top
And just for "your" edification....what kerry did is considered treason and as such is more than just against the law. Also what he did in NO way, help to end the conflict in Vietnam. And as a side question....how did what he said about his fellow soldiers have anything to do with ending the war?


- Considered treason : checked. Let's drop this point, since I agreed on it

- In no way helped to end the conflict in Vietnam. Then what was the purpose of these talks???

- What he said about his fellow soldier doesn't have anything to do with ending the war. Why do you bring it up?
Reply #47 from JoeUser Forums Top
- Considered treason : checked. Let's drop this point, since I agreed on it

- In no way helped to end the conflict in Vietnam. Then what was the purpose of these talks???

- What he said about his fellow soldier doesn't have anything to do with ending the war. Why do you bring it up?


I brought it up to prove a point. Kerry did nothing to help end the war early, all he did was to besmirch the honor and integrity of his fellow soldiers. The purpose of his
Paris talks is laid out in the links of reply #40.
Reply #48 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: CikomyrPosted: Sunday, November 12, 2006
Makes no difference, pro "or" con. It was against the law. He was "still" an officer in the US Navy and what he did was against regulations. And on top of all that he gave up his brothers-in-arms! By portraying them as cowards, murders, rapists and the like.


Indeed. The Law should always be followed blindly, not caring of the consequences.

This is a man who, indeed, violated the law for the greater good: to stop the slaughter. If the White House was to stuck up to negociate, he risked prison to do the right thing. That was probably one of the most apolitical act I've seen in my books.

I would applaude anyone meeting with Bin Laden (or any other terrorist/dictator leadership) today that would lead to the end of hostilities, even if such act was illegal.

So in essence you applaud treasonous acts done by military officers.

Reply #49 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: CikomyrPosted: Sunday, November 12, 2006
Another point to consider....you won't see "any" of this on a major media site. They have been sweeping this under the rug for awhile


any idea why? Especially a republican powerhouse such a FoxNews would keep this under the rug, while there are clear evidence?

Were there any good that came out of Kerry's encounters with these generals? Such as the end of the Vietnam war?

nothing came out from his meetings except to slap vets in the face, again! and again! and again! Hanoijohn is a despicable human.

Reply #50 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: CikomyrPosted: Sunday, November 12, 2006
And just for "your" edification....what kerry did is considered treason and as such is more than just against the law. Also what he did in NO way, help to end the conflict in Vietnam. And as a side question....how did what he said about his fellow soldiers have anything to do with ending the war?


- Considered treason : checked. Let's drop this point, since I agreed on it

- In no way helped to end the conflict in Vietnam. Then what was the purpose of these talks???

the purpose of the talks was to put his name in the limelight and run for office.