COL Gene COL Gene

Iraq is a DISASTER!

Iraq is a DISASTER!




Record Attacks. Record American deaths. 1000 Iraqi Police removed. 3,000 per week dead in Iraq.

How long will it take for George W. Bush to understand his Iraq War is a FAILURE!!! How many more dead will it take to convince the President that Iraq can not be controlled by our military. Only the people of Iraq can settle who will run Iraq not George W. Bush! He is NOT the DECIDER!
22,836 views 82 replies
Reply #26 Top
What I said is about 65% of 200 million adults which is what the polls show do not support Bush.


What poll questioned 200 million adults? Come on dipshit, provide the link.
Reply #27 Top
Polls use a sample that reflects the opinion of the population from which it is drawn. There is a lot of experience that has demonstrated that within the margin of error they do reflect the opinion of the larger population.

What proof do you have that people support Bush? I have poll after poll including those from right wing news agencies like Fox that say the majority do not agree with the direction bush and the GOP are taking this country!.
Reply #28 Top
Polls use a sample that reflects the opinion of the population from which it is drawn. There is a lot of experience that has demonstrated that within the margin of error they do reflect the opinion of the larger population.


I love how you are trying to weasel your way out of this col, but no poll of 1000 can accurately gauge the feelings of hundreds of millions of people. The polls said Kerry was going to win also.

What proof do you have that people support Bush? I have poll after poll including those from right wing news agencies like Fox that say the majority do not agree with the direction bush and the GOP are taking this country!.


Col jihad subscribing to left wing talking points once again.

You are idiots-- The Polls are correct within the error of the polls. Your problem is that you do not like what they show-- Bush is OUT TO LUNCH!


Col jihad, remember how I showed you a poll where the American people didn't blame Bush for Katrina, and how you basically said the poll was bs. HYPOCRITES!!!!

Provide your link to your poll that polled 200 million people, or admit you were wrong. LIAR!!!!
Reply #29 Top
By the way Woodward has reported and verified what others who were at the meetings and who know what the truth is have said.


Woodwards books are nothing more than a collection of "things" people tell him. He's also know to have fabricated stories, Bill Casey comes to mind first. Any idiot can sell a Bush bashing book, no wonder they all come from people like you.

Reply #30 Top
Polls use a sample that reflects the opinion of the population from which it is drawn. There is a lot of experience that has demonstrated that within the margin of error they do reflect the opinion of the larger population.


There is a lot of factual experience to say that polls have been wrong over and over again. You're a complete moron to base any opinion upon biased media polls. Face it, you're an idiot.

You stated that 65% of 200 million adults agree with your obsession. Provide the proof of your claim or admit you are either a liar or an idiot!
Reply #31 Top
The people who as you say tell Woodward are the very people that have first hand knowledge of the issue at hand. They are the people that attended the meetings and KNOW the truth. He has verified the material he has included in his book with multiple first hand sources. He has a track record of accurately reporting what took place unlike Bush. Cheney, Rice and others that have been shown to have lied over and over to the American People!

I never said anything about Bush causing Katrina or any poll about that issue.

I never said any poll contacted 200 million people. What I said is that Polls properly constructed within the margin of error within the poll do predict the feeling of the larger group. The population of Adults in the U.S is about 200 million. Where is your proof that the majority support Bush?

As to what we were told before the Iraq War as to what would take place:

It would be quick and clean.
We would be greeted as liberators.
Iraq would pay for reconstruction from the oil revenue.
We would find WMD.
We would provide additional troops if requested.

EVERY ONE of these claims is 100% incorrect.

Reply #32 Top
He has verified the material he has included in his book with multiple first hand sources. He has a track record of accurately reporting what took place unlike Bush. Cheney, Rice and others that have been shown to have lied over and over to the American People!


Just like he did with William Casey?

I never said anything about Bush causing Katrina or any poll about that issue.


Wow col jihad. You blamed Bush for the Katrina mess, and when I showed you poll on how the public thought differently, you had a fit about it. Talk about selective memory.


I never said any poll contacted 200 million people. What I said is that Polls properly constructed within the margin of error within the poll do predict the feeling of the larger group. The population of Adults in the U.S is about 200 million. Where is your proof that the majority support Bush?


I guess you are trapped in the corner now col. This is your statement....

" No it is 65% of about 200 million adults. "

You have no factual evidence to back this up. Media polls which I have shown often oversample democrats are not accurate to 200 million adults. As mason has said, polls have been wrong over and over and over.

The best "poll" was the last Presidential election. Even though people like you told us how bad Bush was, tax cuts for the rich (which is a lie in itself), the Iraq War, you guys still couldn't win. The majority voted for Bush, and he WILL BE IN OFFICE UNTIL THE NEXT PRESIDENT IS ELECTED. Nothing you will do will change that.

So you keep making false statements. It just shows how truly ignorant and not very intelligent you really are.
Reply #33 Top
I have written so much on this site on the disastrous and from the US point of view self defeating that I have gotten tiredf of the response which is invariably bellicose in tone and bereft of political or strategic analysis.
Reply #34 Top
What I said about Katrina was the inept way Bush who had the resources that were needed to help the people AFTER the storm was a problem. I also pointed out that Bush cut FUNDING TO MAINTAIN THE LEVIES.

I do not know what the issue is about William Casey. What I do know is that over time, since Watergate up to today, what Woodward has reported has been shown to be very accurate unlike what Bush, Cheney, Rice and Rummy have said. Woodward uses multiple FIRST HAND sources that KNOW what took place in each instance. When you look at the collective information from the sources Woodward and many other authors have sighted, the picture is clear to ANYONE that wants to know the truth. The President and his minions have lied, selectively use Intelligence, told half truths and improperly used classification to hide any information that did not support what the President wanted to do or that did not reflect well on him or the GOP leadership.

The feeling in November 2004 when Bush was reelected is NOTHING like the feeling in October 2006. If you use the November 2004 attitude of Americans as your proof that the majority support Bush it is easy to understand why you do not know how Americans feel today.
Reply #35 Top
The feeling in November 2004 when Bush was reelected is NOTHING like the feeling in October 2006.


It's the same col. People like you still have an obsessive hatred for Bush. Your biased media polls prove nothing, and once again we have shown how you are wrong.

Show us the polls that accurately represent 200 million adults col jihad.
Reply #36 Top
The same people that did not like Bush in 2004 still do not like him. What has changed is that millions more no longer support what he is doing and they clearly see his policies ARE NOT WORKING!

The Polls are done FOR the media in many cases by agencies that have a LONG track record of accurately predicting public opinion. There is not a single poll that show the majority support Bush and his policies in October 2006! In fact those very same polls in October 2004 said the support for Bush was just about 50%. Bush received 52% of the votes which is within the 3-4% margin of error of the polls. The polls were correct in October 2004 and they are just as correct today!
Reply #37 Top
The same people that did not like Bush in 2004 still do not like him. What has changed is that millions more no longer support what he is doing and they clearly see his policies ARE NOT WORKING!


So what col. I still don't like Kerry, doesn't really mean much either way.

How arrogant are you that you think you know what 100's of millions of Americans think.

The Polls are done FOR the media in many cases by agencies that have a LONG track record of accurately predicting public opinion. There is not a single poll that show the majority support Bush and his policies in October 2006! In fact those very same polls in October 2004 said the support for Bush was just about 50%. Bush received 52% of the votes which is within the 3-4% margin of error of the polls. The polls were correct in October 2004 and they are just as correct today!



Grasping for straws now I see. Polls are not accurate col jihad. Do you even understand anything other than hate Bush?

We are still waiting for your to prove with documented facts about your claim. You are just showing what a fool you really are by making worthless claims. Go get help for your obsession.
Reply #38 Top
No it is 65% of about 200 million adults. If you believe that the majority agrees with Bush on the Iraq War or for that matter on almost everything you must spend all you time in fantasy land.


NO, it's not! It's 61% of 1,014 adults! Get your facts STRAIGHT yo-yo!
From Wikipedia.com:


October 2006
A CNN poll was conducted by Opinion Research Corporation from 29 September to 2 October, 2006. 1,014 adults were polled nationwide, with a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percent. 61% of those polled disapproved of the war in Iraq, 38% approved, with 1% unsure.[15]


Link
Reply #39 Top
drmiler

Since when is 61% opposing Bush show that the majority support him?
Reply #40 Top
drmiler

Since when is 61% opposing Bush show that the majority support him?
Reply #41 Top
You left out the 1014 adults col jihad. Polls are not reliable. Understand that.
Reply #42 Top
IdlandDog

You are full of BS. Polls properly constructed do show the opinion of the larger group. In 2004 the polls said the presidential election was just about 50/50. Bush got 52% WHICH WAS WITHIN THE MARGRIN OF ERROR OF THE POLLS. You just will not accept that Bush and the GOP leadership are out of sink with America.

Let's see what takes place at the November 2006 election of Congress.
Reply #43 Top
Actually Mr. Author it's "sync".

Col, there is no poll that takes 1000 Americans and tries to represent the feelings of 100's of millions. Get over that. You have been once again shown to be a fool with a crazy obsession over Bush.

Now go take one of your other articles, write it over, and submit it again as usual.




Reply #44 Top
IslandDog

If you really believe the MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT BUSH IN IRAQ OR FOR THAT MATTER WITH ANY OF HIS POLICIES, YOU ARE BEYOND HELP AND HAVE SUCCESSFULLY TAKED YOURSELF INTO A WORLD OUTSIDE REALITY!
Reply #45 Top
Polls properly constructed do show the opinion of the larger group


No. This is the part that you just do not seem capable of grasping. Firstly, there is no such thing as a "properly constructed" poll. Secondly, the opinions of 1,000 hand picked people do not in any way reflect the opinions of the other millions of people in the country.

You are a complete imbicile. You can't even grasp the simplest of concepts. Do you even know how to think for yourself, or are you so dependent upon DNC talking points that you can't even begin to fathom any other line of thought at all? Get this through that thick skull of yours; polls are not accurate. At all. In any way. Poll results are not an acceptable substitute for facts! Accept it and get on with your pathetic little life already.

But then, I suppose someone who uses creditableinstead of credible, or sink for sync can't be expected to be very bright to begin with.
Reply #46 Top
Well I as an American living in a foreign country can say that Bush and all his cronies are nothing but a bunch of liars. Saddam never did have wmd's but just because of a threat or maybe those who intend to deal a death blow to America are sitting back laughing their asses off. You will not catch me and we may do more harm so be careful.

I am scared to return back to the states and seing what is taking place really makes me feel more secure here. a student who is pretty intelligent told me,"Bush is very scary, I dislike him and cannot trust him at all." Sad isn't, it?
Reply #47 Top
If you really believe the MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT BUSH IN IRAQ OR FOR THAT MATTER WITH ANY OF HIS POLICIES, YOU ARE BEYOND HELP AND HAVE SUCCESSFULLY TAKED YOURSELF INTO A WORLD OUTSIDE REALITY!


You are referring to yourself col. You have no idea what 200 million people think. You can't prove your statement so you change the subject as usual. You were called out and humiliated here again. You obsess over a man, you have a mental disorder which needs immediate help.

Nothing you will do will EVER GET BUSH OUT OF OFFICE....ACCEPT THAT FACT!

This is the same bs you were saying back in 2004. Gloom and doom, and all the other lies, and Bush still won. If everything was as bad as you make it to be Bush would have been easily defeated.

What happened to your other gloom and doom predictions col? Where is that draft you told us was coming? LIAR!!!!
Reply #48 Top
I am scared to return back to the states and seing what is taking place really makes me feel more secure here. a student who is pretty intelligent told me,"Bush is very scary, I dislike him and cannot trust him at all." Sad isn't, it?


No, you are sad and foolish. What is taking place that you wouldn't want to come back to the U.S.? Nothing, but the fools in other countries probably tell you the U.S. is a police state and idiots seem to believe that.

Reply #49 Top
In a little over 4 weeks we will see if the dissatisfaction of the voters with Bush and the GOP agenda was real. Stay tuned until November 7, 2006 if the electronic voting machines do not screw up the vote!
Reply #50 Top
IslandDog

As I predicted in 2004, things have gotten worse and if you want to see what I said in 2004 about what would happen if Bush were reelected read my earlier book, Four More For George W.