I don't know, I still think that for this nation to be what it's suppose to be, everyone should pay taxes, reguardless of income. The point is for everyone to have, at least, some responsability for what happens to this nation with that money. It's sad though when we see our money sqandered(spell?) away into politicians pockets.
Agreed, we should have our allies, but not necessarily take their problems and make it our business to fix them, unless it affects our interest.
I agree with every child should automatically have Health Care, unless a parent really can afford it, like rich people. Of course a specific income level should be created to say who get's it and who doesn't. But that will be debatable, for ever. Elderly should also have Free Health Care.
I believe a woman should have the right to chose, I also believe that after a certain time, that choice should be revolked, to a certain extent such as danger to the mother-to-be. But if ignorance and/or irresponsible behavior continues after the first time, then penalties should exist. Though adults are considered to be able to chose on their own, sometimes they act like children and therefor should be treated as such by taking away some of their freedoms like children and teens under parents responsability.
If they crazy, how do you know it's what they really want? And how do we really know if they are crazy and it's not really a possible next evolution on humans? Just curious, I do watch a lot of SciFi, but they get this crap from somewhere.
It only makes sense, humanity has proven that the more something is restricted, the more they want it. Of course, since marijuana has been proven not to be as bad as it was said to be, this is why I agree. But other drugs that are trully harmful should not be legalized reguardless how much they really want it.
Agreed. Something must be done.
I don't care for this issue. I could care less if gay people want to get married or not. Trying to talk sense into them is like trying to convince Col gene that he is not as smart as he thinks he is, pointless. It's a waste of time as far as I'm concerned, a waste of air time, a waste on online bandwith and a waste of taxes.
Keep them apart, but not away. After all, most people are guided by their beliefs and that may not always be bad. I however think that religion should be a personal thing and should not intervean with other peoples lives and working hours.
I'm honest when I say I know very little if nothing about Social Security and how it works. Just have not made it my business to know about it, so I will not say much except I want what I deserve just as much as those who are already getting it and I hope something is done soon. If Dems do get control f the House, and Senate and maybe the Presidency, I expect a solution ASAP. Otherwise I will always see them as con artist who fool the American people into thinking that the Reps could not fix it, therefor vote for us, when they themselves had no solution either.
Agreed.
| Environment /Global Warming |
The people should be educated in understand that they are mostly responsible for this problem. Because of their inability to seek alternative transportation such as Buses, carpooling and trains, they would rather drive alone wasting gas, creating more polution, simply because they don't either want to wait, have more space in the car, have complete control of their trip and are selfish. They should also consider the benefits of alternative fuel vehicles as oppose to just looking at the price tag, or they should at least make a big deal about the price of these vehicles to see if something can be done about it. Instead ignore it and just keep driving them SUVs and sports cars.
Fear or no fear, the Media will always have money, fame and "having it first" as their motivation to get a story and give it to use they way tehy think we would like to see it as oppose to what really happened. The fact that it's in the hands of people alone is enough to make me wonder if any of it is true or is it motivated by "I said it first", "I will make anker with this story" and/or " I'll be rich and famous". Freedom is a very strong word and who better to give it a new or different meaning at will than the Media.
It's not about the truth, it's about what sells.
Well I guess this one will have so many different points of view that if we made 1 party for each view, there would probably be an average of 2 or 3 votes for each party.
Again, ignorant to this so I will just leave it alone.
If altenatives that do not require death are possible, then a little bit more work will not kill anyone. I don't see why one should be used because it "may" yield better results when one that is not really dangerous to anyone can still give good results. Better something than nothing. What if the death of could yield cures (just stick with me for a moment), but it had to be controlled in a lab. Would you allow it, to kill people for scientific purposes? I wouldn't. We will die sooner or later anyways. No need to kill one to save another.
Those are my thoughts. Not quite sure if I agreed with most of your ideas or not.
