Repeatedly blogging on Bush is sure sign of FAILURE

from JoeUser Forums
FAILURE is never learning and blogging on the same tired old subjects without ever realizing that you're having absolutely no impact on the world.

Some people will never learn, either because they are completely ignorant, or because they just lack the mental capacity to assimilate the information that they are given. Which really applies to the case of some of the most ridiculous anti-Bush writers is normally the readers best guess. Which applies to the most prolific of the anti-Bush writers here at JU would definitely seem to be the lacking in mental capacity part.

Calling anything and everything that the President does a failure just continues to show envy of man and the position he has attained. It's an obvious pattern of jealousy that someone else has been far more successful, even if their ideas don't agree with your own, and has reached higher levels than were ever possible for yourself.

A policy of continued and unrelenting Bush bashing is the epitome of failure. Of course it probably won't stop the idiocy, but it can be pointed at and ridiculed for it's complete lack of positive contribution to the world.
politics
6,093 views 19 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
all we have to do is keep encourging others to stay out of his blog till it just dies.
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
I'm not quite with you but I agree that it's a waste of time blogging on Bush. The man is not the brightest star in the Galaxy and he will probably go down in history as another Lyndon Johnson: Couldn't hack it, couldn't win, couldn't put a good team together and certainly couldn't influence anything other than Medicare. You will disagree but Dubya cannot hold a candle to GHW Bush or Bill Clinton.
WindowBlinds - Free yourself of the default settings, customize your desktop.
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
I don't like Bush and personally I think he sucks at what he's doing. I don't bitch about it everyday though...there's not point in it...just gotta stick it out until election time.

~Zoo
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
#2 by adnauseam
Sun, August 13, 2006 0:10 PM


You will disagree but Dubya cannot hold a candle to GHW Bush or Bill Clinton.


I will disagree on bill, it was because of his total lack of action against the terrorist clouds on the horizon that they felt emboldened enough to attack again, this time sucessfully on sept.11th
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
BTW in those days I was DEMOCRAT AND VOTED FOR BILL .
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top

I'm not quite with you but I agree that it's a waste of time blogging on Bush. The man is not the brightest star in the Galaxy and he will probably go down in history as another Lyndon Johnson: Couldn't hack it, couldn't win, couldn't put a good team together and certainly couldn't influence anything other than Medicare. You will disagree but Dubya cannot hold a candle to GHW Bush or Bill Clinton.

You see, that is a reasoned well written criticism of Bush that I can debate with, but respect the person who made it.  I think BC was one of the smartest men to be president, but also one of the most arrogant and abusive of power.  I think W's dad was one of the most sincere, but not too bright.

And I think Johnson was the most canniest and sliest men to ever hold the office!  And he was no dummy either.  So comparing W to Johnson is not an insult in my book (although I did not particularly care for LBJ).

Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
I don't believe any politician could get away with the crap Lyndon pulled routinely throughout his career. DeLay's a mere choirboy compared to him. He was the nastiest, most ruthless & devious politician of his time, and noone's come close since. I give him credit for strongarming the Civil Rights Act and Medicare, though I believe the jury is still out on whether he did the country a favor with the latter. If Bush had attempted the same of sort strongarming on Social Security reform, he'd have been shredded by the media (Oh, wait... he gets shredded no matter what) with more blather about the Imperial Presidency, yada yada.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
You'd be blogging about Bush heavily, too, if you had 4,995 copies left of the 5,000 copies you had printed on the subject of "why Bush sucks" to unload. Give the poor guy a break!
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
You'd be blogging about Bush heavily, too, if you had 4,995 copies left of the 5,000 copies you had printed on the subject of "why Bush sucks" to unload. Give the poor guy a break!

His publisher is a buy one/print one order service. So OUR Author (caps retained for clarity) hopefully doesn't have 5,000 copies on hand.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
His publisher is a buy one/print one order service. So OUR Author (caps retained for clarity) hopefully doesn't have 5,000 copies on hand.


Actually, singr, as I've studied publish on demand, you can lower your cost per book by ordering larger quantities. I'm thinking of doing this to offer autographed copies once I get a website running. I don't know if the good Corporal (hehe) went that route or not, but whether or not he did, thank you SOOOOOOO much for spoiling a perfectly good joke!
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
I'm thinking of doing this to offer autographed copies once I get a website


Sign me up!

And Daiwa, I never said I liked LBJ, only that I admired his manipulation of power. And if Adnauseum wants to compare W to that, I dont have any problem. And in a way, I agree. he has played the democrats like a harp from hell.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
You'd be blogging about Bush heavily, too, if you had 4,995 copies left of the 5,000 copies you had printed on the subject of "why Bush sucks" to unload. Give the poor guy a break!


I have asked him time and again to send me a free copy if he really felt that his book could make this country better. He should do what Micheal Moore did, he did not make a big deal out of his 9/11 being pirated online. He wanted to make sure everyone saw his movie. He should just give his book away as proof that his real concern is the US and not the money he would have made.
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Besides I could always use a new book to straighten a table or the sofa.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
Charles.C wrote:
I have asked him time and again to send me a free copy if he really felt that his book could make this country better.


along with:
Besides I could always use a new book to straighten a table or the sofa.


Now those are some ideas I could be on board with. Seriously, if what the Clueless One is peddling is a cure-all for this country, then damned straight, give it away and educate the masses. On the other hand, if it's nothing but a worthless attempt at profiteering by peddling the same old rehashed Democrat talking points and junk and bogus science from people with an agenda and an axe to grind over current government spending levels in their own little corners of the world, then I can understand why the (and I use the word cautiously here) man is against giving away any copies.

I do very much like the second idea though, as I'm sure I could use a printed copy for simlar purposes (or perhaps use it to line the bottom of my birds cages so they can crap all over it).
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
I do very much like the second idea though, as I'm sure I could use a printed copy for simlar purposes (or perhaps use it to line the bottom of my birds cages so they can crap all over it).


Are you sure you wanna expose your birds to this kind of combined torture of bad spelling and Democrat-disguised-as-Republican rehtoric? You may find them one day either shot in the head by suicide or demanding better treatment like a bigger cage, better food paid with American tax dollars. Hell they might even want you to let the neighbors cat run loose cause they have rights too. After all, the cat is not really bad, he is just hungry.
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
I could always use a new book to straighten a table or the sofa


no doubt.
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
no doubt.


I'm not much of a reader, I would be a bad target for Library ads.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
hey!!!! gene book makes a perfect kindling! all the hot air and gas cause a fire to burn white hot.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
A lot of things are written about and may or may not make an impact,but just for that reason why should anyone stop writing whatever they feel.,who knows...........