| There was no justification to attack and impact a million Palestinians because ONE soldier was captured by a terrorist group. |
Just as there was no justification for toppling the Taliban government and impacting a million Afghanis because only FOUR airplanes were hijacked? Mmm hmmm... okay, whatever.
You really feel that Israel should allow terrorists to kidnap their soldiers without fear of reprisal? You must think this behavior should be encouraged? Wow.
| Israel attacking Lebanon could destroy the new democracy Bush supported and that he claims is the answer to stability. |
Bush supported the Lebanese finally doing something about the decades of Syrian puppet-mastery over their small nation. It wasn't a cure-all, it was only the first step towards self-determination for the Lebanese. And trying to oust Lahoud, which Syrian Pres. Assad appointed, was just a step in the right direction, which Bush (along with the whole darn international community) applauded. From
Wikipedia:
Assad has been criticised for Syria's de facto occupation of Lebanon (which ended in 2005) and the USA put Syria under sanctions partly because of this. He is reported to have played a key role in the accession of the pro-Syrian General Emile Lahoud to the Lebanese presidency in 1998.
Why am I giving you a lesson in Near-eastern politics? You clearly know zero about this region. Why are you trying to pass yourself off as a Mideast policy expert by creating blah blah points out of thin air? The only things you really know about this region are the things used to refute you in this thread. And you're learning more as you go.