The mind of Clinton

from JoeUser Forums
The so-called global warming hasn't killed one person. Terrorism has killed countless numbers. I guess it confirms that Clinton had no reality to the dangers of terrorism.


Former US President Bill Clinton noted that global warming will pose a greater risk than terror in the future and added that all countries should take precautions in this frame.

Talking to a graduating class of the University of Texas' Lyndon Johnson School of Public Affairs, Clinton made some warnings about global warming.

Clinton defended that the United States should adopt policies on global warming that will bring more strategic partners and fewer enemies and use channels of institutionalized cooperation.

"Climate change is more remote than terror but a more profound threat to the future of the children and the grandchildren and great-grandchildren," Clinton told.
politics
1,040 views 1 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
Climate change, sure. Climate change might well kill us all. Now, if he'd like to offer real, solid proof that what we are doing is causing any serious climate change, let him. I'm thinkin he can't. Many scientists can point to recent history as mini-ice ages. Did we cause them? If the earth is warming after an ice age, how do you gauge what is the damage we have done, and what is the normal warming? Any scientist that uses the term "normal levels" to refer to the Earth's widely varying temperatures throughout history, well, they don't deserve the title.

I'm betting that had 9/11 not happened, few of those killed would have succumbed to global warming. If there is a nuclear attack on a major city, you're talking about the possibility of hundreds of thousands or millions of casualties. That's a lot of MISSING children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren. I think in terms of potential harm, I'll take my chances with a profound threat to existing people than a good chance of them not existing at all.