Bush Responsible for Spate of Horror Movies

http://newsbusters.org/node/4927

Yes, before a certain person can blame the latest ill on Bush, I decided to expose this new abomination that has as its root, George W. Bush.

It seems that the director of Hostel, a totally depraved and disgusting movie (yes I have seen it), Eli Roth, has decided that in addition to world war, Malaria, Dysentery, and the pain of psoriasis, Bush is also responsible for a resurgence in horror films.  Never mind that they have never left us, and the only difference between Hostel and Texas Chain Saw Massacre (released in the 70s - Bush's Fault I am sure) is the setting.  Never mind the countless sequels to Friday the 13th, Nightmare on Elm Street, and Halloween that have cursed us over the last 25 years.  No, they don't count.  Or if they do, they are Bush's fault as well.

No, the reason Horror movies have had a new (as in old or tried or repeat) renaissance is because people need to scream. (The movie in no way compares with a classic like Psycho that actually did make one scream).  Even though during the screening I saw, I heard no screams, just an occasional retching (some even for the horror scenes, but mostly due to the lousy directing).

So for certain clueless liberals, young and old, now you have another Bash Bush topic.  Hostel.

It is all Bush's fault.

13,272 views 46 replies
Reply #1 Top
Let me be your first comment. I do not think Bush had anything to do with Horror Movies.

The truth about his administration and its impact on our future will provide an unending source of material for real Horror stories and a very difficult future.
Reply #2 Top
let me be the first to comment in the same spirit as the article was written.

Oh the horror! the agony! how dare Bush do this to the american people? has he no concious?
Reply #3 Top
I do not think Bush had anything to do with Horror Movies.


Should I get that engraved on a locket? The Col has finally found something he thinks Bush isn't responsible for.

Oops, I just farted. Gene is Bush responsible for that? *Insert Bush beans joke here*
Reply #4 Top

Let me be your first comment. I do not think Bush had anything to do with Horror Movies.

The truth about his administration and its impact on our future will provide an unending source of material for real Horror stories and a very difficult future.

!  Thank you.

Reply #5 Top

Oh the horror! the agony! how dare Bush do this to the american people? has he no concious?

This is one where, if it were true, I would like to resurrect Patton in the next Horror Movie (Night of the LIving Dead Generals) and have him yell "I am personally going to Washington to shoot that paper hanging son of a beatch!"

Reply #6 Top

Oops, I just farted. Gene is Bush responsible for that? *Insert Bush beans joke here*

Pfewwww!  Those red beans are ripe!

Reply #7 Top
Dr. Guy

Only if he gave you beans for dinner.
Reply #8 Top
Should I get that engraved on a locket? The Col has finally found something he thinks Bush isn't responsible for.


Oh my friend you are mistaken. Read Col's post again and realize that even though he first claims not to blame Bush for horror movies he blames him for giving enough material to make horror movies. But wouldn't that mean it would be Bush's fault for the making of the movies anyways?

It seems that no matter how hard Col might try, he will somehow blame Bush for anything, even when he thinks he's not.

BTW, I have an idea about a horror movie with Bush. Some would consider it a porn movie, but I just can picture Bush and his wife getting it on without freaking out as much as I did when I saw The Amityville Horror.
Reply #9 Top
Dr. Guy

Only if he gave you beans for dinner.


Oh my God, Col is trying to be funny. Now that's a first. You almost sound like you are trying to make friends. Maybe there is still hope for you.
Reply #10 Top
The horror movies of late have definitely been low brow enough to blame on Bush . . .

But seriously.


GET A FREAKING LIFE ELI ROTH! This is the most ridiculous claim I've heard of late. While I don't believe in shutting people up if I don't agree with them, it doesn't keep us from realizing he's full of crap, right?

He earns a raspberry.
Reply #11 Top

Dr. Guy

Only if he gave you beans for dinner.

Red bean farts are always ripe!

Reply #12 Top

BTW, I have an idea about a horror movie with Bush. Some would consider it a porn movie, but I just can picture Bush and his wife getting it on without freaking out as much as I did when I saw The Amityville Horror.

OMG!  EVIL!  Stay away!  I cannot take the horror!

Reply #13 Top

Oh my God, Col is trying to be funny. Now that's a first. You almost sound like you are trying to make friends. Maybe there is still hope for you.

I think given the topic, it is hard to be serious, and I am glad that everyone can come in and make jokes, puns, themes for new horror movies, or anything else that will make you laugh or scare the poop out of you!

Reply #14 Top

GET A FREAKING LIFE ELI ROTH! This is the most ridiculous claim I've heard of late. While I don't believe in shutting people up if I don't agree with them, it doesn't keep us from realizing he's full of crap, right?

He earns a raspberry.

Maybe he is trying to cross over into Comedy?

Reply #15 Top
Maybe he is trying to cross over into Comedy?


And when he does, we can boo his movies off the stage!
Reply #16 Top

And when he does, we can boo his movies off the stage!

My son can read you chapter and verse on which director did what and such.  He is really into movies (all types), but I cant tell you what else Roth has done.  However I can tell you that he is no Alfred Hitchcock!

Reply #17 Top
I actually think that Hostel was Roth's first flick. That's why he showed it at some obscure horror film fest first and somehow got Quentin Tarantino to throw his name on the top to try to give it some "street cred".

I find the whole idea of the movie disturbing at any rate, and chose not to see it, but whatever. He should just stick to making bloody gorefest, and obviously keep his hands out of cognitive thought.
Reply #18 Top

That's why he showed it at some obscure horror film fest first and somehow got Quentin Tarantino to throw his name on the top to try to give it some "street cred".

I find the whole idea of the movie disturbing at any rate, and chose not to see it

I indulged my son, but afterwards told him I was thoroughly disgusted with it.  All he could talk about was the cinematic aspects of it!  if he does not go to a college with a good film department, I am going to wring his neck!  He really sees a lot more than I in films.

Reply #19 Top
Never mind that they have never left us, and the only difference between Hostel and Texas Chain Saw Massacre (released in the 70s - Bush's Fault I am sure) is the setting


Well, I disagree with that. As far as I remember, most of the gore in the original TCM was off screen. (For example, when Leatherface hangs the person on the hook, we see him lift them, then drop them, then the shot cuts to the feet where we see blood splattering down. Today, we'd get loving slow-mo shots of the hooks piercing the flesh, etc.) It's more about intensity and mood. As far as I recall the goriest thing we actually see is at the very end when Leatherface falls and his chainsaw rips his leg a little. What I compare to TCM is the first Jurasic Park because of its disturbing unrelenting intensity. In fact, that's what I wrote about JP at the time of it's release: "a disquieting intensity not seen since Texas Chainsaw Massacre."

Anywho....


I do not think Bush had anything to do with Horror Movies.


Of course he did! Didn't you see Fahrenheit 9/11?


Reply #20 Top

(For example, when Leatherface hangs the person on the hook, we see him lift them, then drop them, then the shot cuts to the feet where we see blood splattering down. Today, we'd get loving slow-mo shots of the hooks piercing the flesh, etc.)

Another one like my son!

Of course he did! Didn't you see Fahrenheit 9/11?

Ohh! Point set and match!

Reply #21 Top
What I find unfortunate is how Nash, apparently, chose to make a blanket statement without any intellectual property to back it up. A really interesting study could be made exploring why (perhaps) horror movies enjoy a spike in both production and viewership (chicken or egg?) during certain times, because there are periods where such films are more prevalent then others. Is there a relation to wars? Economics? Presidents? Political parties? Or religious movements which encourage teenage girls to take their boyfriends to movies instead of making out? The possiblities are endless, really.
Reply #22 Top
Oh the horror! the agony! how dare Bush do this to the american people? has he no concious?['/quote]

Yep, let me be the first to say I also blame Bush for the recent spate of bad romcoms. I mean, if he is going to be responsible for schlockfests he should also be responsible for bad romcoms too.

I am not a George Bush fan but this accusation is absolutely ridiculous. Well pointed out, Doc.
Reply #23 Top

Is there a relation to wars? Economics? Presidents? Political parties? Or religious movements which encourage teenage girls to take their boyfriends to movies instead of making out? The possiblities are endless, really.

Given my son's love of movies and analysis of them, I will publish his conclusions as soon as he reaches them.

Reply #24 Top

Yep, let me be the first to say I also blame Bush for the recent spate of bad romcoms. I mean, if he is going to be responsible for schlockfests he should also be responsible for bad romcoms too.

I am not a George Bush fan but this accusation is absolutely ridiculous. Well pointed out, Doc.

What is a romcom?

And if he is responsible, would that include Wolf Creek? (not a bad movie from Australia).  If so, then does that make him king of the world?

Reply #25 Top
Is Bush also responsible for Brokeback Mountain?