it would be a huge conspiracy but there are some things that strike me as odd... especially the pentagon incidence...

Oh, BTW, you may want to check out this link.  Kind of sinks that conspiracy theory.  But they will ignore it since it does not fit into their kook theory. http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

Maybe I missed the answers

I think you did. The link was just one of the links that blows this kook theory out of the water. This one dealing with the Pentagon plane. And the kooks contention that the plane (first) that hit the WTC did not have windows is refuted by photgraphic evidence.

Look, I got questions too. But I am not going to hang myself out on a limb trying to prove it was a conspiracy. The problem with a conspiracy that large is that there are too many people involved, and they cannot keep their mouths shut.

But the beauty of this kook is that if you do not believe him, you are part of the conspiracy. A perfect crime in his book.

And unfortunately it seems like I have to sort out more trash than the crash.

Fortunately, the facts are out there. I no doubt beleive that much is still not told. But there were too many witnesses that at least we know the how, just not the why. The Kooks try to contruct the how, in the face of irrefutable evidence. Now if they instead consentrated on the Why, that would be another issue. (That French Guy kind of did).

You'll recall that there was video footage of the first passenger jet crashing into the WTC, not just the second - that French camera crew interviewing a firefighter on the street when they heard the low-flying plane and swung the camera up to film it.

That's just one point. The logistics of a "conspiracy" this large are simply not doable in anything but a Hollywood film and someone's fevered imagination. Take the theories that the towers & WTC7 were taken down by demolition charges - just explain to me how the conspirators could have pulled that off, something that would have required weeks of work that could not possibly have been hidden from view. I don't care that the buildings fell down "too straight" - I'll just accept that gravity works.

A whole bunch of people were supposedly murdered just to take out Ron Brown, too, but I don't buy that, either.

crashing into what the pentagon? if so i would love to see that

No, the WTC.  That was one of their statements.  That the first plane did not have windows.

Thanks Secret Squirrel.

It's a building, and it didn't collapse until well after the second plane hit. Considering that it fell apart in giant boulder sized clumps that probably weighed tonnes or close to it, it's not surprising the pieces had extremely limited ballistic paths. Wind resistance of any kind on a multi-tonne chunk of rock would kill flight speed. I would be much more surprised if the building fell over rather than collapsing.

Cacto -

I agree with you. There is a theory that a bunch of (alleged) mechanical & building engineers have cobbled together which holds that we should be suspicious that the structural failures which initiated the collapse of each building occurred more or less "simultaneously" (allowing the buildings to collapse straight down rather than at least a portion of the buildings toppling over) and that the odds against that are too high. That it looked too much like a planned demolition to not be one. Eh.

The also claim that puffs of debris being ejected from upper story windows of WTC7 in the instant or two before its collapse becomes apparent externally indicate explosive charges were used. It's all garbage, but interesting to play with. They only have to look at the Sampoon shopping center disaster, though, to see that a large building can simply collapse in on itself, even without a fire.

I don't care that the buildings fell down "too straight" - I'll just accept that gravity works.

I remember watching this show, and that show said that first building had an intact inner column for short time, so outer walls fell first. I guess it kept building from tipping over while falling down. Second one was opposite, with inner supports falling first, helping it fall straight down by imploding.