in order to ensure i wasn't being overly critical, i went back to the articles i cited
Think that Islamic violence is limited to outside the US?? 2/8/2006 (if i read it right, you were pretty sure it wouldnt be for long)
This has nothing to do with UAE or the port deal. |
no. it has to do with an apparent contradiction between this:
Of course not, the MSM does not want to "insult" or "inflame" the Muslim Community because they are AFRAID of them! Wel I am not afraid of them and here is what happened.
and this:
Is not everyone in America supposed to be innocent until proven guilty? Where was the trial I missed that convicted an entire county (the UAE) of being terrorist and terrorist sympathizers? I missed that landmark case.
Americans are supposed to be better than that |
moving on to this one:
Radical Muslims could establish solid base in U.S. 2/9/2006 (if you posted this today, i'm thinking the title might be 'unless you can prove otherwise, it's not right to say radical muslims could establish a solid base in the us')
Radical Muslims being the key words here. Again, the UAE are not radical muslims. At least last time I researched it |
clearly you didn't write this article (it's credited to that loveable ol scamp cal thomas). you also didn't offer any qualification or disclaimer. without expressing your disagreement with parts of anything you post in full, a reader has no choice but to conclude you're in total agreement with every word you posted.
like these words for instance:
Other subheadings offer advice on reconnaissance, infiltration, ambush and how to manufacture explosive devices, open locks and train assassins. One section details plans to hit buildings with large populations, including museums, ports and archaeological sites and to attack VIPs. David Perry, prosecuting counsel, told the court, “This is a manual, a blueprint for terrorism.”
Perry said the document’s execution section recommends that Islamic agents be sent to any country intended as a target at least 10 years before jihad begins.
as well as this:
Among the many problems with this twisted religiosity is that the West does not know how many share it. Instead, political leaders repeat the bromide that Islam is a “peaceful religion” and radicals are trying to hijack it. Are we being infiltrated by people who, on the outside, pretend to be peaceful and tolerant, but inside wish to undermine and overthrow our government?
accomplishing those goals would be difficult unless the conspirators hadda means of infiltrating the us and remaining in place without arousing suspicion. a business operated in a widely recognized hotbed of corruption might present exactly the right sorta situation no?
then there's this one:
Christians Targeted as Bloody Cartoon Violence Continues 2/20/2006 (hmmmm i've run outta irony dammit)
Again I run out of things to say, like this has nothing to do with terrorist or terrorism |
another cut n paste without any disclaimer or disavowal. you did add your own take tho by using your own words for both the title and subtitle:
Muslims, the peace loving people...hmmmmm
if you truly meant to compliment islam because you believe it is a peaceful religion, i'm clearly taking this the wrong way...and i'll apologize soon as you provide confirmation.
next...
Where was the Muslim outrage when: 2/8/2006 (quite frankly, i wouldnt have wanted to be a tourist from dubhai or bahrain who ran into you on february 8, 2006)
Again I am talking of the Islamic extremeist, |
you're wanting to know where the islamic extremist outrage is? do you really expect any when it seems you have suspicions about ALL muslims?
That's it, I am sick of it, its such a crock of bulls&^t I can't take it anymore. Here is what I think of your so called outrage!!!
and....
They're outraged because it is part of the Islamic jihadist culture to be outraged. You don't really need a reason. You just need an excuse. Wandering around, destroying property, murdering children, firing guns into the air and feigning outrage over the slightest perceived insult is to a jihadist what tailgating is to a Steeler's fan.
I know and understand that these bloodthirsty murderers do not represent the majority of the world's Muslims.
you seem unsure about that a few lines further down the page when you claim:
Indeed. Why not? Could it be because they down deep support these radicals? Maybe they are scared of them? I don’t know but if they won’t stop them, I know a few people who will
and so it goes.
