Spanish Elections in the Wake of 11-M

An Insider's Perspective

Thank goodness that all of my friends in Madrid are okay! I finally heard from all of them. A good Spanish friend of mine saw the whole thing unfold at Atocha Renfe station, and he is pretty certain that had he entered the station 2 minutes earlier, he'd be "muerto". I thought that I'd share part of an email sent to me by a friend of mine who is teaching English in Madrid. You can all read the news, but it's interesting to get an insider's perspective:

"AS for the elections, the results really depended on who exactly set
the bombs. I´ve been told that if people thought it was ETA, then the PP
would win because they have done a lot to fight these leftist extremists.
HOwever, if it was Al Queada then the PSOE is expected to win because of AZnar´s
alliance with the United States against these islamic terrorists. Now
that everyone is sure that it´s Al Qaeda there is a good chance that the
PSOE will win and a lot of things will change. I have spoken with students
and some Spanish friends and most support the PP. They don´t like how the
PSOE would change the Spanish government and don´t want spain to completely
withdraw from its alliance with the US and Britain. I was in Puerta del
Sol today and there were all these candles lit in honor of the victims of
11-M. There were also signs saying STOP VIOLENCE! and Spanish flags hung all
over the Ayuntamiento with peace signs on them. HOwever, what really
disturbed me was there were tons of HATE signs all over namely blaming Aznar, Bush,
Blair, and the US as a whole for the bombings. I don´t support what Bush has
done, but it seems really hypocritical to me that people were angry with
Bush for attacking Iraq purely out of vengeance, but yet they so easily
have placed their anger with terrorism on other countries. We all want to
stop terrorism, but anger and hatred are no solution to this problem."

The results of the election should be in soon and will be rather interesting. Before the attack, the Popular Party candidate, Mariano Rajoy, had a lead of 3-5 percentage point over the Socialist party candidate Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero. But now Spaniards who were previously going to give their vote to the PP are changing it to Socialist. And those who were not previously planning on voting at all are throwing their support behind the Socialists. Spaniards have been saying all along that Aznar's support of the US effort in Iraq would backfire. Remember that approximately 95% of the population opposed the war. There was and still is overwhelming opposition to the war in the form of huge protests in the streets. Another thing to keep in mind is that Spaniards were furious with their own government , not with the US, for getting them into the war. It wasn't so much anti-American sentiment as it was anti-Aznar & the PP. They were able to forget temporarily about their anger at the government for ignoring 95% of the people's wishes in a democracy, but these brutal attacks (and that fact that some are accusing the government of concealing the al-Queda connection from the government for fear of political fall-out) have rekindled that flame of anger and mistrust.


2,909 views 5 replies
Reply #1 Top

It will say a lot about the culture of the Spanish people. Are they cowed into submission by violence or is their instinct to fight back?


Americans made their answer quite apparent after 9/11.

Reply #2 Top
I really like how Wardel exploits the article's conclusions to fuel his stereotypical thinking. It is true that the current affairs have poured oil into the fire of the political struggles and the opinion of the masses, but it have not cowed anyone - it have simply strengthened the opposition and gave it the right time to speak up. As for Americans, they did what they do best - at least we have to agree on that! It would have been an interesting observation if this had to happen in US, just in the middle of the electoral preparations. I think the results would be quite similar.
Reply #3 Top
well, the Socialists have won in Spain after an election with 80% turn-out. I can't quote a percentage of Americans who voted in the last presidential election, but isn't half that? So I guess the people have spoken and they're getting what they want. I think people voted with their emotions today instead of their heads. I think the country will see a lot of changes because of this. I just hope that the new ruling party doesn't make any radical changes, like cutting ties with the U.S. That would be a shame. I don't know what you all think of Aznar, but I think he did the right thing by getting Spain involved in Iraq. He is praised by the Spanish people for his firm opposition to ETA, but when he (and his party) tries to take a stand against international terrorism, he is severely criticized and rejected by his people. Had ETA been responsible, I have no doubt that the PP & Rejoy would have won. Spaniards praise Aznar & Rejoy for their tough stance against ETA, but when they take a tough stance against al Queda, they are practically stoned.
Reply #4 Top
Vote intentions didn't change because of the bombs. Mine didn't. The reason for the psoe winning is that lots of leftists that didn't vote for the psoe (which is a crappy party right now) have gone to vote in the "blame aznar" spirit. And that was around 20% of the electorate which used to be all abstentions.

Things would have been very different if the bombs had been 2 weeks before the elections. America has lost an ally, and has lost it for good. A pity for us all.
Reply #5 Top
It really is a shame those few have switched allowing the terrorists to accomplish something of that magnitude. I agree some of them did that in grief after loosing their relatives and friends, but that surely does not explain the total number of people that switched their view. Mind that it is not more or less than:

Al-Queida replaced Spanish government!

Sorry but this seems very naive to punish the government for defending its people from those ruthless people.