| and their defence of NAMBLA |
nothing i know about nambla excuses nor mitigates its existence. in a better world, there would be no such thing.
abhorrent as it and its members may be, until it and they do something illegal, squelching their outrageous message does as much damage as censoring mohammed cartoons.
if nambla injures people or destroys property--whether by intention or negligence--they, like cartoonists or anyone else equally responsible, can and should be hauled into court to have the facts tried. should they be found liable, they should be made to compensate their victims.
that doesn't mean they aren't entitled to a defense...especially when this is the kinda case made against them.
28. Prior to joining NAMBLA Charles Jaynes was heterosexual
118. As a direct and proximate result of the urging, advocacy conspiring and promoting of pedophile activity by NAMBLA, Radow, Powers, Thorstad, Miller, Herman, Hunter, Schoen, Charles Jaynes became obsessed with having sex with a raping young male children
106) The Defendant John Doe Inc.'s malicious, willful, wanton or reckless conduct directly and proximately caused the death of Jeffrey J. Curley under such circumstances that Jeffrey J. Curley could have recovered damages for personal injuries if his death had not resulted.
note that joe doe inc is an internet service provider.
in other words, the the killer-rapists were not responsible for their behavior because they were led astray by the internet.