Rep Heather Wilson (R-NM) who is the chairperson of the House Intelligence Subcommittee on Technical and Tactical Intelligence has broken ranks with the White House and called for a full congressional investigation into the NSA Surveillance Program.

The lawmaker, Representative Heather A. Wilson of New Mexico, chairwoman of the House Intelligence Subcommittee on Technical and Tactical Intelligence, said in an interview that she had "serious concerns" about the surveillance program. By withholding information about its operations from many lawmakers, she said, the administration has deepened her apprehension about whom the agency is monitoring and why.

Ms. Wilson, who was a National Security Council aide in the administration of President Bush's father, is the first Republican on either the House's Intelligence Committee or the Senate's to call for a full Congressional investigation into the program, in which the N.S.A. has been eavesdropping without warrants on the international communications of people inside the United States believed to have links with terrorists.

The congresswoman's discomfort with the operation appears to reflect deepening fissures among Republicans over the program's legal basis and political liabilities. Many Republicans have strongly backed President Bush's power to use every tool at his disposal to fight terrorism, but 4 of the 10 Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee voiced concerns about the program at a hearing where Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales testified on Monday.

Ms. Wilson said in the interview Tuesday that she considered the limited Congressional briefings to be "increasingly untenable" because they left most lawmakers knowing little about the program. She said the House Intelligence Committee needed to conduct a "painstaking" review, including not only classified briefings but also access to internal documents and staff interviews with N.S.A. aides and intelligence officials.

Ms. Wilson, a former Air Force officer who is the only female veteran currently in Congress, has butted up against the administration previously over controversial policy issues, including Medicare and troop strength in Iraq. She said she realized that publicizing her concerns over the surveillance program could harm her relations with the administration. "The president has his duty to do, but I have mine too, and I feel strongly about that," she said.


This issue isn't going to be settled for a very long time.
7,857 views 24 replies
Reply #1 Top
I can't believe no one here has called her a "Rino" yet.
Reply #2 Top
She called for an investigation....so what? It will end up as all the other investigations have....proving nothing.
Reply #3 Top
The problem with these investigations is, we have the fox guarding the henhouse. Take the Senate inquiry into pre-war Iraq intelligence for example. What ever happened to Phase II of the investigation? It’s stalled by the republican congress because they know the outcome is going to make the Bush administration look bad. If we had a Democratic administration doing all the things the Bush administration is doing, there would have been impeachments and dozens of indictments by now.
Reply #4 Top
Surprise, it's election year. Let the empty PR moves begin.
Reply #5 Top
What a great way to cover her bases. If there is an investigation and it turns out no laws were broken, she can say, "wow, it's a good thing we cleared that up". If it turns out there were laws broken, she can come out and say, "yeah, I thought I smelled a rat".

Nice strategy Rep Wilson!
Reply #6 Top
Nice strategy Rep Wilson!


Exactly!
Reply #7 Top
She called for an investigation....so what? It will end up as all the other investigations have....proving nothing.


Which other investigations are you referring to?
Reply #8 Top
Which other investigations are you referring to?


How many do you want us to list?
Reply #9 Top
All the ones that involve the NSA Surveillance program. That is the topic afterall.
Reply #10 Top
All the ones that involve the NSA Surveillance program. That is the topic afterall.


Ok, you list them. Your question (not on topic) was Investigations. Not NSA Investigations. Now you want to narrow the rules further? It is your blog.
Reply #11 Top
There haven't been any investigations into this, so how could I list them? That's what I was asking Island Dog. We're talking about an investigation into the NSA, he said it will end up like all the other investigations. So I asked him what investigations he was referring to.

So why don't you just let him answer? Oh, I forgot because you get 5 points for each post....I keep forgetting that.
Reply #12 Top
Which other investigations are you referring to?


We're talking about an investigation into the NSA,


Uh, no. That may be what you meant, but that is not what you asked.
Reply #13 Top
So why don't you just let him answer? Oh, I forgot because you get 5 points for each post....I keep forgetting that.


Dont you? Hi, I am Dr. Guy. Nice to meet you PW!
Reply #14 Top
Take your whoring somewhere else.
Reply #15 Top
Take your whoring somewhere else.


Remember the 3 fingers. And your incessant denials of self. Try to be honest. really. You do not make a sympathetic victim, no matter what your party says.
Reply #16 Top
Now I see! You hate crow!

K, I will leave you in peace to eat it.
Reply #17 Top
WE have two very fundamental issues in the NSA situation. WE have the reality of HOW do we Protect this country from a world wide insurgency. The other issue is to protect our legal system and our Constitution that has enabled us to prosper as a society.

WE need to try and do both. The problem is that Bush refuses to look at these two issues and simply tells us what he is doing is proper. WE need to get this issue to the Supreme Court to rule if the way Bush has chosen to protect the country is constitutional. No congressional investigation can settle this question. If the court rules that the methods Bush is using are within the law and Constitution then the issue is settled. If they rule his actions violate the Constitution or the laws, we must see if there is not a way to protect our nation within the legal system of the country!
Reply #18 Top
What, Ben? So Republicans are not all sheep? Some are foxes, now?

Cheers,
Daiwa
Reply #19 Top
Which other investigations are you referring to?


All the other failed attempts by democrats to somehow prove something against Bush. Remember all the conspiracy theories that were debunked by the Sept. 11 commission?
Reply #20 Top
The problem with these investigations is, we have the fox guarding the henhouse. Take the Senate inquiry into pre-war Iraq intelligence for example. What ever happened to Phase II of the investigation? It’s stalled by the republican congress because they know the outcome is going to make the Bush administration look bad. If we had a Democratic administration doing all the things the Bush administration is doing, there would have been impeachments and dozens of indictments by now.


Try again clueless. First off phase II "has" been completed and turned in. And secondly it was the "democrats" stalling it. They didn't want all their "BS" to come out.
Reply #21 Top
All the other failed attempts by democrats to somehow prove something against Bush. Remember all the conspiracy theories that were debunked by the Sept. 11 commission?


I don't recall those "conspiracy theories" being congressional investigations.

Try again clueless. First off phase II "has" been completed and turned in. And secondly it was the "democrats" stalling it. They didn't want all their "BS" to come out.


Phase II has been completed? Do you have a link to the report, or at least a link to s tory saying it's done?
Reply #22 Top
Try again clueless. First off phase II "has" been completed and turned in. And secondly it was the "democrats" stalling it. They didn't want all their "BS" to come out.


Phase II has been completed? Do you have a link to the report, or at least a link to story saying it's done?


I was trying to delete that portion of my comment but couldn't because you had already posted behind me. I retract that portion of my statement.
Reply #23 Top
I don't recall those "conspiracy theories" being congressional investigations.


The Sept. 11 Commission was pushed by the democrats because they believed "Bush knew".
Reply #24 Top
It looks like the House may be backing off pushing for a "full investigation".

Link