singrdave singrdave

Michael Moore Breaks Canadian Law

Michael Moore Breaks Canadian Law

Opening his mouth against Canada's popular will

It was bound to happen sooner or later - Michael Moore's ritual destruction of politics, this time on both sides of the border. Now he's into Canadian electoral interference.



Next time Moore comes to Canada, he should be charged with violating the Canada Elections Act s. 331:

331. No person who does not reside in Canada shall, during an election period, in any way induce electors to vote or refrain from voting or vote or refrain from voting for a particular candidate unless the person is

(a) a Canadian citizen; or

(b) a permanent resident within the meaning of subsection 2(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

2000, c. 9, s. 331; 2001, c. 27, s. 211.



Michael Moore publicly announced this statement Friday:

Oh, Canada -- you're not really going to elect a Conservative majority on Monday, are you? That's a joke, right?

These are no ordinary times, and as you go to the polls on Monday, you do so while a man running the nation to the south of you is hoping you can lend him a hand by picking Stephen Harper because he's a man who shares his world view. Do you want to help George Bush by turning Canada into his latest conquest? Is that how you want millions of us down here to see you from now on? The next notch in the cowboy belt? C'mon, where's your Canadian pride? I mean, if you're going to reduce Canada to a cheap download of Bush & Co., then at least don't surrender so easily. Can't you wait until he threatens to bomb Regina? Make him work for it, for Pete's sake.

But seriously, I know you're not going to elect a guy who should really be running for governor of Utah. Whew! I knew it! You almost had me there. Very funny. Don't do that again. God, I love you, you crazy cold wonderful neighbors to my north. Don't ever change.

Michael Moore



Could it be any more clear that Moore is inducing people not to vote for Stephen Harper, a guy who "should really be running for governor of Utah", not the Prime Minister of Canada? As Moore is not a Canadian citizen, he is not entitled by Canadian law to influence this election. For all those free speech types out there, this is seen as a restriction of right. Sure, it may be. But it is the law. And for all those who respect the rule of law should have no problem condemning Moore. After all, the elections laws have so far held up in Court, with the Courts saying that the government has a right to restrict freedom of speech in an election (specifically, the restriction of publishing Atlantic results in the BC time zone before their polls close).

People like Moore ought to be charged when they come up to Canada.
11,469 views 28 replies
Reply #26 Top
and some yall complain the loudest about sloppy fact checking and selective reporting on the part of the dreaded msm.

just a little tiny bit of digging woulda led you to discover whatta non-issue this is.

PART 16
COMMUNICATIONS
*

Interpretation

Definitions
319. The definitions in this section apply in this Part.

"election advertising" « publicité électorale »
"election advertising" means the transmission to the public by any means during an election period of an advertising message that promotes or opposes a registered party or the election of a candidate, including one that takes a position on an issue with which a registered party or candidate is associated. For greater certainty, it does not include**

(a) the transmission to the public of an editorial, a debate, a speech, an interview, a column, a letter, a commentary or news;

(b) the distribution of a book, or the promotion of the sale of a book, for no less than its commercial value, if the book was planned to be made available to the public regardless of whether there was to be an election;

(c) the transmission of a document directly by a person or a group to their members, employees or shareholders, as the case may be; or

(d) the transmission by an individual, on a non-commercial basis on what is commonly known as the Internet, of his or her personal political views***.


* this would be the part of the act under which s 331 falls.

** ooops. seems as if there are some exclusions goin on.

*** it's really sad and disturbing to see those who profess to be the most supportive of america's freedoms eagerly--and, to be frank, ignorantly--calling for enforcement of a provision they mistakenly believe to limit freedom of speech.
Reply #27 Top
on the other hand, i believe the head of one country's government threatening to cut off grants of financial aid to another country's populace should they not vote the way they're told has gotta qualify as inducing "electors to vote or refrain from voting or vote or refrain from voting for a particular candidate"
Reply #28 Top
"electors to vote or refrain from voting or vote or refrain from voting for a particular candidate"

You mean like America is doing to Palestine after they voted in Hamas?