Walter E. Williams addressed it yesterday better than I could. He mentioned that he could not understand anyone who was standing in front of him complaining about the inability to earn a living wage. Obviously, if the person's still alive, he is earning a living wage.
That being said, the statement is highly flawed. What is considered a "living wage" by certain individuals in this country is a wage adequate to provide a two car, nice TV, DVD, VCR, game system and all the frills to make up a middle class existence...and provide it NOW! No delayed gratification here.
I support a family (5 children) on about HALF the US median income. While property values are lower here than in many areas, my family is also substantially larger. We pinch every penny, conserve energy, think about our purchases, and try to avoid unneccessary frills. A two income family making minimum wage (NOTE: the average wage for unskilled labor is substantially above minimum) makes just over $20,000 if they're both working 40 hours a week; the number hops to over $22,000 with two kids and EIC figured in. One wage earner working 60 hours a week (before you consider that oppressive, consider that the average working family in 1900 consisted of two adults working 50-60 or more hours a week, children working full time jobs, and boarders whenever the family could take them in) makes just over $15,000; again the number leaps to over $19,000 when EIC is figured in (again, assuming two or more kids). This does not even begin to factor in the numerous benefits that these families are eligible to receive at the federal and state level, which raises their "true income" substantially.
The average wage for unskilled kitchen workers (source: Bureau of Labor Statistics) is over $8.00 an hour. So a two income family at 40 hours a week where dad works as a cook and mom as a dishwasher would be pulling in about $32,000 a year...not a fortune, but not chump change either (note: I've done the homework on this and all of the appropriate links can be found on my article "We're WINNING the War on Poverty). So, this individual's information is based on sound bites, not actual fact.
I would continue in stating that, according to the World Bank, 1.1 BILLION (yes, that's with a "b", folks) individuals worldwide live on less than $1 a day, an amount obtainable by most Americans simply by walking and collecting aluminim cans (actually, you can FAR exceed that by that endeavour...but I digress). That's 1/5th of the world's total population. By comparison, only about 13% of Americans live in "poverty" by American standards, which is SUBSTANTIALLY higher than world standards.
That's where I'd start. But since I've already documented this information WITH SOURCES elsewhere, I highly doubt the individual in question will listen.