terpfan1980 terpfan1980

Ding dong the witch is almost dead...

▼

Ding dong the witch is almost dead...

(figuratively, not literally...)

from JoeUser Forums

Gee, I seem to recall someone  (one particular) suggesting that Obama was falling back to Earth and that Hillary was widening the gap and gaining strength.  In fact, there were some loco comments in this article: Hillary campaign insists on changing rules after the fact

So do the results that came in INdiana or North Carolina reflect that change?  If so, uh, gee, I seem to be missing it.[more]

In fact, now there are headlines showing up saying things like:

(From Drudge: Hillary plans to huddle with undecided super delegates tomorrow; gauging if she can go on... Developing...)

Or these results from the end of the evening:

NC [99% PRECINCTS]
OBAMA 888,979 56%
CLINTON 655,482 41%

IN [95% PRECINCTS]
CLINTON 606,497 51%
OBAMA 589,888 49%

So where exactly was that loss of momentum for Obama? Where was the gain for Hillary Clinton?

Even if Hillary Clinton somehow convinces the DNC to count the votes which shouldn't be counted (Florida and Michigan) she's virtually done.  She needed a blowout in Indiana and even with Republican voters casting votes for her in the hopes of keeping the race going on the Democratic side she still didn't get a convincing win there.  Most likely it'll be another of those phyrric victories where she can claim to have gotten the majority of the popular vote but then loses in the candidate count thanks to the screwey math that the Democrats are using.

In North Carolina (a big state that the Democrats need to win in the general election) the situation is completely hopeless.  15% margin in Obama's favor and a likely serious blowout in the delegate count going to him.

Hillary Clinton may stay in the race a little longer but the outcome has been known for a while and even attempting to plaster him as a racist in the vein of Rev. Wright hasn't derailed him.

Been nice knowin' you as a potential President Mrs. Clinton.  Now slink off to your spot in the Senate and go back to doing, well, nothing to help the country.

politics
16,562 views 48 replies
Reply #26 from PolMach Forums Top
Bush isn't running
Bush isn't running
Bush isn't running
End of quote


But every Republican running is personally responsible for their guilt in aiding the destruction caused by the Bush junta which they aided and abetted.

McCain is deservedly being held personally accountable and no true PATRIOTIC American will ever support McSame.
Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top
McCain is deservedly being held personally accountable and no true PATRIOTIC American will ever support McSame.
End of quote


Good thing no one by the name McSame is running. But I dont think a bot would understand that, or understand what they write since they did not think it, just regurgitated it.
ObjectDock - Access shortcuts and frequently used applications from an animated dock.
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
But every Republican running is personally responsible for their guilt in aiding the destruction caused by the Bush junta which they aided and abetted.
End of quote


Please show me Hillary or Obama's roles in derailing the train wreck that was the Bush presidencey, The_Politico. The truth is, these two rubber stamped every major GOP policy right along with McCain. The sad fact is, we have not one, but three pathetic, inadequate candidates to represent us in November.

Putting it all on McCain's shoulders is incorrect.
Reply #29 from PolMach Forums Top
o one by the name McSame is running
End of quote

You never heard of John McSame the aka "The third Bush Term".

Reply #30 from PolMach Forums Top
I dont think a bot would understand that,
End of quote


Patriotic Americans know that a vote for John McSame is a vote for a third Bush term.

Note: That would exclude you.
Reply #31 from PolMach Forums Top
Putting it all on McCain's shoulders is incorrect.
End of quote


No every Republican who supported him on even a single vote during his presidency is equally responsible for the murder of 4,000 US soldiers and equally deserving of criminal prosecution for aiding and abetting the murderous psychotic occupying the oval office at present.
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
No every Republican who supported him on even a single vote during his presidency is equally responsible for the murder of 4,000 US soldiers and equally deserving of criminal prosecution for aiding and abetting the murderous psychotic occupying the oval office at present
End of quote


Why don't you hold Democrats who voted for the SAME war to the same level of accountability, The_Politico? THERE ARE NO INNOCENTS among these final three, face it.

Yet somehow McCain's vote carries more weight because he is of the same party? If ANYTHING, Obama and Clinton should be held to a HIGHER level of accountability, because they represent the party that was supposed to put CHECKS on Bush's Presidential power.

The minute we accept that they're ALL scum will be the minute we have a shred of HOPE of moving to a more responsible government.
Reply #33 from PolMach Forums Top
Obama didn't vote for the war. He isn't responsible for it.
Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
You never heard of John McSame the aka "The third Bush Term".
End of quote


No, do you live in fairy land? There are currently (soon to be 2) candidates running. Beleive it or not, none of them are Bush. Not a Jeb, George, Zeke, Pete, or Pat.
Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top
Patriotic Americans know that a vote for John McSame is a vote for a third Bush term.

Note: That would exclude you.
End of quote


Jawohl Mein Herr! Du bist ein gut Bundist. Dass ist was Adolph gesagt.

You have the speech pattern down pat. Now all you have to do is start killing people for who they are. Something you seem to already be advocating. Thankfully, that makes your slurs about real americans all the more false, since you dont apparently know what country, or century, you are living in.
Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top
Obama didn't vote for the war. He isn't responsible for it.
End of quote


So you are claiming that in his entire Senate career, Obama never voted for a single Bush bill?

Huh. Gonna hafta do my research on that one, but I think you're wrong.

The only reason he didn't vote for the war was because he wasn't a sitting senator to do it. I'm sure he voted for a few appropriations bills to keep our guys over there!
Reply #37 from PolMach Forums Top
all you have to do is start killing people for who they are.
End of quote


Thats a Bush trait, no thanks.
Reply #38 from PolMach Forums Top
your slurs about real americans a
End of quote


I've never made a slur about a REAL American. I've made statements of fact about psuedo Americans.
Reply #39 from PolMach Forums Top
So you are claiming that in his entire Senate career, Obama never voted for a single Bush bill?
End of quote


I'm saying that Obama was opposing the war and did not vote to allow Bush to begin his war of lies.

Reply #40 from JoeUser Forums Top
your slurs about real americans aI've never made a slur about a REAL American. I've made statements of fact about psuedo Americans.
End of quote


Liar - You just did. Do I have to rub your nose in it, or are you going to deny it again? Lying seems to be your only asset.
Reply #41 from JoeUser Forums Top
I'm saying that Obama was opposing the war and did not vote to allow Bush to begin his war of lies.
End of quote


Because he wasn't in office to vote against it!

Only ONE senator has consistently opposed the war and the US Patriot Act and HIS name ain't Obama. It's Russ Feingold, for the record.

EVERY OTHER of your precious Dems has blood on his/her hands.
Reply #42 from PolMach Forums Top
Liar - You just did.
End of quote


Name one who actually supports AMERICA who I insulted.

Reply #43 from PolMach Forums Top
Because he wasn't in office to vote against it!
End of quote


So you believe that changes the fact that he didn't vote for it?
Reply #44 from PolMach Forums Top
Only ONE senator has consistently opposed the war and the US Patriot Act and HIS name ain't Obama.
End of quote


Completely untrue. But then again why let reality stand in the way of your rants, Dr. Iwishiwasaguy doesn't.
Reply #45 from JoeUser Forums Top
So you believe that changes the fact that he didn't vote for it?
End of quote


But he didn't vote against it either now did he?
Reply #46 from JoeUser Forums Top

[quote]But he didn't vote against it either now did he? [/quote]

Obama was at church during that time, finishing his 20 year Marxist ideology training.

But he didn't vote against it either now did he?
End of quote

That's his out....even now he never votes for anything der party doesn't want him to vote on. A true follower. It's easy to adjust your words against history without repercussions.

Reply #47 from JoeUser Forums Top
Name one who actually supports AMERICA who I insulted.
End of quote


Bush, McCain, Thompson, Smith, Allen, Warner, Cantor, Your mother, Your Brother, you intelligence (well maybe not that one since none seem to be in evidence), etc......

You really should engage your brain once in a while.
Reply #48 from JoeUser Forums Top
Completely untrue.
End of quote


Actually, it is NOT completely untrue. I stated that Feingold was the only Senator to consistently vote against BOTH, and if you look back, the USA Patriot Act only had ONE vote against in its initial passage. And that would have been Feingold.

Tell me, TP...Were you born an asshole or is it just a finely tuned skill? I have tried discussing things rationally with you, yet you subject me to the same nastiness that you do people who get into the name calling business. Want to be a jerk? Fine, your prerogative. But you aren't going to win many to your POV that way, that's for certain!