Saturday, July 19th 2008
Firefox 3 Release & Stardock Site Compatibility
Jul 30, 2008 12:59

Firefox 3.0 goes final and is scheduled for release on Tuesday, June 17th.

There are currently known incompatibilities between Firefox 3 and many of our sites and forums. For the most part, the sites function properly, but have formatting issues. A specific example are the login & password fields to log into these forums. In Firefox 3, instead of both being on the same line, they are stacked vertically.

We will be addressing these visual issues in time. Please do NOT post threads on the forums pointing out Firefox 3 site issues. They will be deleted. We are aware of the problems and will work as quickly as we can to resolve them.

Until posted otherwise, the only version of Firefox our sites support at the moment is Firefox 2.

A taste of their own medicine

operation chaos is working

By Posted May 6, 2008 14:18:44

For years democrats have been manipulating primary elections so they can have a weak challenger for their candidate. They did it in 2000 by voting for Senator McCain against Governor Bush. It did not work but they tried hard in several elections previous now it seems that doing this is a bad thing. When it happened to republicans it was okay and fair. When it happens to democrats, i.e. “operation chaos”, it is a bad thing. Maybe next election they will let republicans determine who we want for elected office without any interference from the democrats. Okay I am dreaming but it could happen.

0 Karma 36 Replies 3 Referrals
May 6, 2008 14:25:08
The democrats have wanted to go against Senator McCain for decades and now they have their chance. What they did not count on was operation chaos, and now they are faced with a brutal fight causing Senator Clinton to attack and beat up Senator Obama saving money and grief for Senator McCain. Senator Clinton can’t be called a racist for attacking Senator Obama because she is a fascist liberal whereas if Senator McCain said the same things there would be articles for months about how racist the republicans are. Thank you Senator Clinton for making it easier for my party to win.
May 6, 2008 15:21:21
It is amusing to see them tear themselves apart with the lies they have been heaping on the republicans for years. Wil lthey learn? I dont think so. But then we have a ton of articles and quotes to throw back in their face the next time they start it. It will not stop them, but perhaps it will make some think twice about the party of hypocrasy.
May 6, 2008 17:27:58
It is amusing to see them tear themselves apart with the lies they have been heaping on the republicans for years.


Democrats have always been the party of racism, sexism and homophobia, yet they still scream that republicans are the bad guys. Well, if being a racist, bigoted, homophobic sexist hypocrite is being the good guy then I will be happy to be the bad guy.
May 7, 2008 20:19:24

It is amusing to see them tear themselves apart with the lies they have been heaping on the republicans for years.

But when have they ever applied the rules to themselves? Ask one of the true believers and they will tell you it's not the same thing. My example the_politico...funny he hasn't chimmed in.

May 8, 2008 06:39:30
they will tell you it's not the same thing.


I know. When I first heard this, my jaw dropped as I could not beleive the stupidity and hypocrasy of the speaker! Now, sadly, I expect it.
May 8, 2008 21:16:57
For years democrats have been manipulating primary elections so they can have a weak challenger for their candidate. They did it in 2000 by voting for Senator McCain against Governor Bush. It did not work but they tried hard in several elections previous now it seems that doing this is a bad thing. When it happened to republicans it was okay and fair. When it happens to democrats, i.e. “operation chaos”, it is a bad thing. Maybe next election they will let republicans determine who we want for elected office without any interference from the democrats. Okay I am dreaming but it could happen.


John McSame is a doddering old fool of at best questionable mental acuity and undeniably low intelligence and poor morals. He has already pledged himself to continuing the disastrous policies of the Bush junta while simultaneously getting as many US soldiers killed as possible in Iraq over the next 100 years.
May 9, 2008 00:25:01
John McSame is a doddering old fool of at best questionable mental acuity and undeniably low intelligence and poor morals.


What does this have to do with the points made in the article? With your superior, for a liberal, intellect I would expect you to at least have the attention span to stay on topic and on point. Or is this too great an expectation from you?

He has already pledged himself to continuing the disastrous policies of the Bush junta while simultaneously getting as many US soldiers killed as possible in Iraq over the next 100 years.


This is a lie, and the newest talking point from the Obama campaign, they tried it last month and it did not work because it was disputed by the record. If you are going to tell other peoples lies and mischaracterizations then you should at least be honest enough to say where you got it from so people won’t think you ignorant. Or is this your way of confirming, what we all suspected but hoped was incorrect, that you can’t come up with an original thought of your own?
May 9, 2008 07:42:47

Operation Chaos is merely putting a mirror up to the DNC, and they can't stand what they are seeing.

May 9, 2008 08:03:44
Operation Chaos is merely putting a mirror up to the DN


Name one prominent Democratic Organization that has openly suggested violating election law by intentionally voting for who you feel is the easiest republican candidate.

Not that you will be able to, nor do I expect you to let a little thing like you can't back up your lies prevent you from repeating them. If you had ethics you wouldn't be a republican.
May 9, 2008 08:29:54
I would expect you to at least have the attention span to stay on topic and on point. Or is this too great an expectation from you?


Apparently so. Thus the reason I use the delete button when she goes off on her infantile rants about her anatomy.
May 9, 2008 08:32:59
Name one prominent Democratic Organization that has openly suggested violating election law by intentionally voting for who you feel is the easiest republican candidate.


The DNC, Howard Dean, Democrat Party, etc., etc. etc.
May 9, 2008 09:25:15
The DNC, Howard Dean, Democrat Party, etc., etc. etc


None of them have done any such thing, you have again proven yourself to be a liar.
May 9, 2008 11:40:37
None of them have done any such thing, you have again proven yourself to be a liar.


Liar - they have done everything you accused the republicans of. YOu are the one that said it was illegal. Cant keep your story straight now? I guess with the attention span of a turnip that is hard for you.
May 9, 2008 14:03:12
I'm still not sure I understand why states have 'open' primaries. While I understand the argument for 'elect ability' I'm not sure I agree with having these 'open' primaries so early in the game.

It is always fascinating how the receiving end of their own medicine screams foul play.

I think this time they are just jealous of the effectiveness of organizing such an operation.

Ah, such sweet drama.
May 9, 2008 14:10:53
I'm still not sure I understand why states have 'open' primaries. While I understand the argument for 'elect ability' I'm not sure I agree with having these 'open' primaries so early in the game.


I agree. But as long as they do, they cant blame people for taking advantage of it.
May 9, 2008 14:12:43
Liar - they have done everything you accused the republicans of.


Yet you can't cite a single instance of it. Gee, I WONDER WHY.
May 9, 2008 14:13:38
I'm still not sure I understand why states have 'open' primaries. While I understand the argument for 'elect ability' I'm not sure I agree with having these 'open' primaries so early in the game. It is always fascinating how the receiving end of their own medicine screams foul play. I think this time they are just jealous of the effectiveness of organizing such an operation. Ah, such sweet drama.


Yet another anti american individual repeats the "taste of their own medicine" lie yet cannot cite a single instance supporting their lie.
May 9, 2008 14:47:11
Yet another anti american individual


Please explain how am I anti-American?
May 9, 2008 14:52:42
Yet you can't cite a single instance of it. Gee, I WONDER WHY.


I did. Read it you moron. Reply #11. Now you cant even count!
May 9, 2008 15:15:43
"It is odd that George W. Bush has voiced concern over the ability of Democrats and independents to influence the outcome of the GOP nomination, when in fact he has continually boasted the belief that, if elected, he would be a compassionate conservative who would unite and not divide." - LA Times (Feb 19, 2000) WWW Link

There's one.
May 9, 2008 15:18:43
"(The State News) (U-WIRE) EAST LANSING, Mich. -- Some Michigan Democratic leaders are urging state Democrats not to cast their ballots in the Feb. 22 Republican presidential primary." - The State News (Feb 22, 2000)

WWW Link

~Yawn,

Here's another.
May 9, 2008 15:50:55
Yet another anti american individualPlease explain how am I anti-American?

You suppor Bush that means you oppose America. Plain and simple.
May 9, 2008 15:52:06
Yet another anti american individualPlease explain how am I anti-American?

You suppor Bush that means you oppose America. Plain and simple.
May 9, 2008 15:54:20
Reply #11


Spouting random names is not the same as citing instances you fool. Name the Person/organization, DATE the claim was made, the way the claim was made and a supporting link WITH SPECIFIC QUOTES.

Anything else just proves you can't back up your claims.
May 9, 2008 15:54:51
"(The State News) (U-WIRE) EAST LANSING, Mich. -- Some Michigan Democratic leaders are urging state Democrats not to cast their ballots in the Feb. 22 Republican presidential primary." - The State News (Feb 22, 2000)WWW Link~Yawn,Here's another.


YAWN THEY ARE URGING THEM NOT TO DO IT. Are you illiterate?
Stardock Forums v1.5.3112.18688
© 1995-2008 Stardock Corporation. All rights reserved.
All times are EST. The time is now 11:35:20
Server Load Time: 00:00:00.0000015   Page Render Time:
Copyright © 2008 Stardock Corporation. All Rights Reserved.