How very dishonest of you. I notice the link "forgot" to mention that the posters they listed were not actually Obama posters. But hey rightwingers have never seen facts as as a reason to get in the way of their libel.

Dishonest? Then why does his campaign fly the Che Flag?

Boy, you can hear the spin bots whirring now!  

And your point is?

Trying to put meaning into the similarities really sounds like a straw man fallacy to me. All candidates have people who volunteer their time who are questionable or otherwise murky.

Well there is the fact that it doesn't. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are simply ignorant rather than intentionally dishonest. I am assuming you are repeating the republican lie of assigning the Obama Campaign blame for a che flag being hung in a unaffiliated office sponsored by people unrelated to the campaign who chose to volunteer for Obama.

But again, Republicans never let facts get in the way of libel.

Thank goodness there's someone new who can spew partisan hack from the left now, instead of us having the endless supply of rightist bullshit we get on this site.

It feels more evenly full of shit now . . .

No response ID?

Simple minds love simple ideas.   

I didn't see your original question before. 

My point is Obama has suspicious ties to Marxists, racists, and anti-Americans.  I find it interesting his most popular campaign poster, which is being sold on his site, is created by one of these people.

 

Ok, go to the address bar, and type www.google.com.

And do your own damn reading! It made front page on not only Fox, but CNN, but of course it was not on those left wing hate sites like retarded monkey, moron.org, or the puffington host.

Get your head out of your butt, and do some work.

Completely wrong, the office was opened by volunteers and Republicans lying about it always "forget" to mention the part about how Obama staffers didn't even run that office.

 

Its apparent that I gave you too much credit in assuming that you were ONLY ignorant and not dishonest.  Its quite apparent you are willfully ignorant and intellectually dishonest.

 

Click HERE

I've done my bit of looking into it, and found that it was like it was, just done by supporters. My point is however, is to have you look. Here's the catch: It's called backing yourself up. It's a journalism thing, and hell, it's even a debating thing. If you are going to assert something, or claim the sky is purple, then you have to have the balls, and/or the evidence to back it. Period. Or you don't bother.

Also, I find it slightly humorous that you mentioned the very news outlets that you, when you don't need them,



And? See, if he was to exclude the very guy, then 1) He'd be hypocritical. 2) He'd be bashed by republican pundits (and probably others).

Unless he's actually out and out said something anti-American or it is found out that he did something illegal with those connections, I'm not going worry. I mean hell, I have some acquaintances with people who are blatantly racist. Doesn't mean I agree with their views.

Thinking about it, with what he's done in his life, and how far he's come, I find it actually unsurprising that he has friends/acquaintances of that flavor. He's always seemed the type to get to know various types of people.



Republicans or Democrats, it isn't solely based on their party, just the person they are.

Better to teach a loon to search, than to give him a false link.

See above for the correct link. Or are loony loopy luddite lefties capable of that?   

FYI - for the record, since you are new, I am not a Republican. I am conservative.

I realize its hard for you to keep track of your lies but you claimed his campaign flew it. Its impossible for his campaign to do it without him being culpable. The fact is it had nothing to do with his campaign therefore you are proven to be a liar.