Saturday, July 5th 2008
Firefox 3 Release & Stardock Site Compatibility
Jul 30, 2008 12:59

Firefox 3.0 goes final and is scheduled for release on Tuesday, June 17th.

There are currently known incompatibilities between Firefox 3 and many of our sites and forums. For the most part, the sites function properly, but have formatting issues. A specific example are the login & password fields to log into these forums. In Firefox 3, instead of both being on the same line, they are stacked vertically.

We will be addressing these visual issues in time. Please do NOT post threads on the forums pointing out Firefox 3 site issues. They will be deleted. We are aware of the problems and will work as quickly as we can to resolve them.

Until posted otherwise, the only version of Firefox our sites support at the moment is Firefox 2.

Barak Obama, Empty Suit!

An Original thought would cause him to have a brain melt down!

By Posted April 11, 2008 13:45:50

This is why An Empty Suit Like Barak Hussein Obama appears to be such a powerful speaker! He has done his home work, or has more than likely had his lackeys do it for him and has copied the speaking patterns of four of the most powerful speakers of the last 65 years. The only Powerful speaker he left out was Adolph Hitler, but I am sure if he thought he could get away with it he would have used Adolf as a role model too!.

Basically he is much like the dummy a ventriloquist holds on his lap while the man does the speaking. If he had an original thought I believe his brain would explode.

1. Hold Out Hope

Like Winston Churchill, Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, and Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama speaks in the uplifting rhetoric of hope. After his defeat in New Hampshire, Obama’s political oratory was so hopeful he sounded more like a winner than a runner–up. Obama knew a hopeful message would embolden his supporters. In a speech on Jan. 8, 2008, Obama said, “We know the battle ahead will be long. But always remember, no matter what obstacles stand in our way, nothing can stand in the way of the power of millions of voices calling for change… We have been warned against offering the people of this nation false hope. But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.” Except when you are running on a platform of pie in the sky politics.

You are the leader people want to believe in. Your customers and employees are bombarded by bad news – the credit crunch, a housing slump, an economic slowdown – but they are eager to hear something positive. That doesn’t mean leaders stick their heads in the sand – far from it. Inspiring leaders acknowledge the situation but also remind people of reasons to be optimistic.

2. Use Rhetorical Devices

Many observers say Obama sounds like King. This is because he uses some of the same techniques that made King an electrifying speaker. Barak Obama is not fit to scratch Kings butt, and King was a liar himself, King for one was not a dr. of anything. His name was not even Martin Luther. King also ripped off the " I have a dream speech" from another pastor!

Parallel structure. We can thank the ancient Greeks for this rhetorical tool – they called it “anaphora.” It simply means repeating the same word or expression at the beginning of successive sentences or phrases. One of the most famous examples is King’s “I Have a Dream” speech. “I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed…. I have a dream that… I have a dream…” Obama uses the same device frequently. In his Iowa victory speech on Jan. 3, Obama said, “You have done what the cynics said we couldn’t do. You have done what the state of New Hampshire can do in five days. You have done what America can do in this new year.”

Anaphora’s sister technique is called “epistrophe.” It is the repetition of a word or expression at the end of successive sentences or phrases. For example, in Obama’s New Hampshire speech, the expression “Yes, we can” rallied thousands of supporters when used like this, “It was a creed written into the founding documents that declared the destiny of a nation: Yes, we can. It was whispered by slaves and abolitionists as they blazed a trail towards freedom through the darkest of nights: Yes, we can. It was sung by immigrants as they struck out for distant shores and pioneers who pushed westward against an unforgiving wilderness: Yes, we can.”

Alliteration. Both Kennedy and King were fond of this device that strings together words starting with similar sounds. At the 2004 Democratic National Convention keynote speech that brought Obama to prominence, he said, “Do we participate in a politics of cynicism or do we participate in a politics of hope?” In 2005, during a commencement speech at Knox College, Obama described America as “a place where destiny was not a destination, but a journey to be shared and shaped…” When speaking at the Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars in August, 2006, Obama proclaimed, “The history of America is one of tragedy turned into triumph.” In January’s New Hampshire speech, Obama used alliteration again: “We have been told we cannot do this by a chorus of cynics.” My Sentence would be " We have been lied to by the leader of losers"

Rich Imagery. Persuasive speakers have long understood the power of imagery to stir emotions – the creation of mental pictures through the words. In his 2004 speech, Obama described what he meant by the audacity of hope: “It’s the hope of slaves sitting around a fire singing freedom songs, the hope of immigrants setting out for distant shores, the hope of a young naval lieutenant bravely patrolling the Mekong Delta, the hope of a mill worker's son who dares to defy the odds, the hope of a skinny kid with a funny name who believes that America has a place for him, too.”

3. Exude Confidence

In debates Obama appears unflappable, answering tough questions while maintaining strong eye contact. He doesn’t fidget or shake his head when listening to sharp attacks from his opponents. While seated, he leans slightly forward. People will make an impression of you after only a few seconds. Pay attention to what your body is saying. Communicate confidence, competence, and control. He has been schooled well, I wonder how much money he spent on trying to appear as though he is cool under pressure? I would like to see a debate with heart and blood pressure machines hooked up to the candidates so we can really see who maintains their cool and who is just APPEARING TO BE COOL!

4. Use Dynamic Vocal Delivery

A monotonous speaking style lulls the listener to sleep, regardless of the power of the content. Obama knows how to enhance his delivery. Consider these three aspects of his delivery.

Pacing. Obama varies the speed at which he speaks. Very few sentences are delivered at exactly the same pace.

Volume. In his victory speech after the Iowa caucuses, Obama raised the volume of his speech with each sentence in the following paragraph: “We are one nation. We are one people. And our time for change has come.” Each sentence slightly louder than the one preceding it.

Pauses. Nothing is as dramatic as a well–placed pause, and Obama knows it. He pauses at key moments to make a memorable impact. If only he would pause, period!

0 Karma 175 Replies 10 Referrals
April 25, 2008 21:18:54
Yes, did you understand the question?


Wait, now I'm confused. History 101 isn't enough? You need written documentation that McCarthy
A) existed
B) was a Republican
C) falsely accused people of being Communist
D) Condemned people for their political beliefs
E) was censured by Congress for conduct unbecoming a senator and finally
F) Scared America into a crazed witch hunt for years?????

Wow, here I was, thinking that I knew less than all of you political crazies and yet not a one of you know what has happened in recent American history!

I feel smart.
April 26, 2008 01:12:25
CEDARBIRD POSTS:
Two words:

Joseph McCarthy

DRGUY POSTS:
Yes, did you understand the question?


CEDARBIRD POSTS: Wait, now I'm confused. History 101 isn't enough? You need written documentation that McCarthy
A) existed
B) was a Republican
C) falsely accused people of being Communist
D) Condemned people for their political beliefs
E) was censured by Congress for conduct unbecoming a senator and finally
F) Scared America into a crazed witch hunt for years?????

Wow, here I was, thinking that I knew less than all of you political crazies and yet not a one of you know what has happened in recent American history!


Any questions?


Hi Cedarbird,

Ya, I have a few questions.

Seems as though political correctness has hit college history courses...the ritual flogging of McCarthy continues..

Are you aware that back in 2003 new information arising from the release of the secret files from the early 50's sheds new light on Sen. McCarthy?

Was America gripped by a McCarthy induced "hysteria"?

McCarthy's career as an anti-Communist began in Feb. 1950 with his Wheeling speech and was effectively ended in with his censure in Dec. 1954. Why was Harry Truman chased out of Washington in 1952 with an approval rating of 23%? Why did Joe McCarthy enjoy a 50-29 favorable rating as late as Jan. 1954?

I'll give you a hint...Joe was right and his enemies were wrong.

How about this one?

Was McCarthy right that FDR and the New Dealers were as soft on Stalin as Neville Chamberlain had been on Hitler?








April 26, 2008 02:48:16
Two words:

Joseph McCarthy


Any questions?


Yeah, I have a question for you.
If Senator McCarthy was so bad why did you not include his biggest backer and helper? Senator John F. Kennedy, or Senator McCarthy’s staff lawyer Robert F. Kennedy? You know the guy that dug up the dirt and pointed fingers at possible contenders to the presidency to clear the way for his big brother.
April 26, 2008 12:16:53
If Senator McCarthy was so bad why did you not include his biggest backer and helper? Senator John F. Kennedy,


Oh, that's easy. I omitted information to prove my point. Politicians do it all the time. Especially a certain one who shall remain nameless. It's the American way, right?

Oh, and though I don't have documents, I do have a friend who was questioned by the secret service for helping to organize and anti-Bush rally in California.

"Are you now, or have you ever been a...terrorist!?!?!?!?!"

Ah, history and the repetition thereof.

Okay, I'm really done now. So when I don't respond, it's simply because I haven't read your comment because I'm not going to.
April 26, 2008 12:38:24
The most ethically challenged Democratic congress in history remains immeasurably more moral than the least ethically challenged republican congress in history.


Wait, now I'm confused. History 101 isn't enough? You need written documentation that McCarthy


You did not understand the question. Perhaps English 101 is for you. Look again at his claim. "The Most Ethically Challenged" vs the "least ethically challenged". Now for the key word. CONGRESS - not congressman (which McCarthy would not have been anyway), or Senator (which he would have been), but CONGRESS.

Now do you want to retract your non-sequitar?
April 26, 2008 12:39:05
and yet not a one of you know what has happened in recent American history!


No, you just dont understand the written word.
April 26, 2008 13:43:04
Wow, here I was, thinking that I knew less than all of you political crazies and yet not a one of you know what has happened in recent American history!


Cedarbird,
Regarding McCarthy, I can assure you that if you seek the truthful answers to those questions I raised in post 152, you too will know what has happened in recent AMerican history.

Right now, at least on this, you are just following the politically correct herd.

April 26, 2008 13:55:19
Cedarbird,
Regarding McCarthy


Also, point number 2. If you want to go by congressMAN instead of congress, and include Senators in that bunch, please now prove that McCarthy was THE MOST ETHICAL

the least ethically challenged republican


Republican in congress in the history of this country. (DOnt forget to include Lincoln).

Least ethically challenged = most ethical in PC speak.

Point #3 (should you choose to accept the challenge): After proving point number 2, then prove how all the democrat congressmen that went to jail are more ethical than any republican in the history of this country. Also, all democrat congressmen that did not go to jail.
April 26, 2008 20:01:37
Oh, that's easy. I omitted information to prove my point. Politicians do it all the time. Especially a certain one who shall remain nameless. It's the American way, right?


Are you a politician? Outside of politics what you did would be called a lie.
Oh, and though I don't have documents, I do have a friend who was questioned by the secret service for helping to organize and anti-Bush rally in California.


I had a father who lost his job because of McCarthy. Took him three years to get back on the NYPD. The secret service does that with anyone and every organization pro or con to the current president. It is called standard operating procedure. If the president is coming to town all people with a criminal record that says anything bad about the president gets questioned buy the police, the more serious offenders are questioned by the Secret Service. If an organization is anti the president then they check it out. How is it you equate the safeguarding of our national leader with what McCarthy did? Or is this another lie or omission of facts to prove your point?

Okay, I'm really done now. So when I don't respond, it's simply because I haven't read your comment because I'm not going to.


How insulting. Well the rest of us will enjoy putting you on the list of people like col Gene.
April 26, 2008 21:01:23
Okay, I'm really done now. So when I don't respond, it's simply because I haven't read your comment because I'm not going to.


A shame, because it is leaving you looking stupid since you evidently did not understand the question the first time around.
April 26, 2008 21:38:16
This is liberal bravery we call it cowardice!   
April 27, 2008 14:12:29

The_Politico
LIBERALS L0VE SPENDING MONEY AS LONG AS IT IS NOT THERE OWN MONEYAnd liberals know the difference between "there" and "their".

another typical Liberal trick, find a mistake in sentence structure or spelling and concentrate on that instead of the sentence itself. I smell weakness over there, but I am sure the weakness it coming from over their {you}

April 27, 2008 14:15:54

The_Politico
So much for the most ethical Congress in history,The most ethically challenged Democratic congress in history remains immeasurably more moral than the least ethically challenged republican congress in history.

Such as refusing to even hear subjects that cast aspersions on members of their own party?

Such as covering up 70,000 dollars found in a freezer by a leading Democrat?

Such as demanding wind power, till it ruined Drunken Ted and Bobby Kennedy's view of Chesapeake Bay?

April 27, 2008 14:26:21

Cedarbird
Prove it. Statements of fact should be easily proved. So provide it.Two words:Joseph McCarthyAny questions?

Here we agree, Joe was and is forever a blight on the Parties name

May 5, 2008 09:31:50
Here we agree, Joe was and is forever a blight on the Parties name


MM, as I pointed out that the democrats were also involved in that witch hunt and as soon as things turned sour the slipped into the shadows and hid. Robert F. Kennedy was Senator McCarthy’s official attorney in this mess yet he came out with clean hands.
May 5, 2008 11:45:27
Such as refusing to even hear subjects that cast aspersions on members of their own party?

Such as covering up 70,000 dollars found in a freezer by a leading Democrat?

Such as demanding wind power, till it ruined Drunken Ted and Bobby Kennedy's view of Chesapeake Bay?


eth·ic
–noun
1. the body of moral principles or values governing or distinctive of a particular culture or group: the Christian ethic; the tribal ethic of the Zuni.
2. a complex of moral precepts held or rules of conduct followed by an individual: a personal ethic.

WWW Link

Yep, by definition I would say they are the most ethical by Democratic Standards as MM points out.
May 5, 2008 11:54:14
Yep, by definition I would say they are the most ethical by Democratic Standards as MM points out.


Sad but true! Too bad they don’t have a good ethical standard. Thiers seems to be one of what ever makes me rich and powerful is ok as long as you don’t do it too.
May 6, 2008 19:26:49


Two words:Joseph McCarthy


MM posts:
Here we agree, Joe was and is forever a blight on the Parties name



Hello MM,

I know history ever since the 50s has depicted McCarthy as a loathsome figure who supposedly in a witch-hunt falsely named some US state department figures and others as Communists and Soviet agents.

But are you aware, MM, that in 2003 new information (actual transcripts) was released from the files from the early 50's that sheds completely new light on Sen. McCarthy?

Since then, several groundbreaking books have been written, one is Blacklisted by History by M. Stanton Evans, all corroboating the cases McCarthy was making then, the most notorious of Annie Lee Moss and how the truth about it was concealed for 50 years. Anne Coulter defends Mccarthy in her book, Treason. She wrote that at Tehran, FDR ceded Poland to Stalin, and the New Dealers were as soft on Stalin as Neville Chamberlain had been on Hitler. She writes that the FDR-Truman administrations were saturated with traitors and names names.

Evidently there were systematic high level efforts to cover up the facts included in McCarthy's files by an order by Pres. Truman in March 1948. Actual FBI reports informed us about Communists and Soviet agents on federal payrolls as early as Dec. 1942 but nothing was done for more than a decade.

So, after reading these I can't agree with you that McCarthy was a blight on the Republican Party. We should have more like him today...turns out everything the liberals want us to believe about Sen. Joe McCarthy and the McCarthy era is false. He exposed the Communists in the party and that was when the Right was right.



May 7, 2008 06:12:14

The spectalular series of victories won by Mr Barack Obama, eight in a straight row, raises two questions. How can we expalin his success. And two, what are the lessons to be learnt from the Obama style of political rhetoric and communication. I am surprised that the American media has not started analysing the style and substance of Barack Obama's speeches and public addresses. In mu opinion there is no politician in the English speaking world today who deploys the poetical cadence of the English language more effectively than Obama. Ronald Reagan was known as the "Great Communicator" but he fell far short of Obama for the simple reason Reagan was not interested in fashining his message in the accoutrement of the poetics of the language. For him the film script served as the rhetorical model, but Barack Obama brings to his public messages a vision of hope and fulfillment, a mixture of Biblical sentiments and the hard nosed realities of an America in economic problems. Some people have commented that Barack Obama is tall on rhetoric and short on policy: the exact reverse of Hillary Clinton who is all policy and no dreamworker.

Unlike Martin Luther King jr who spoke in the language and style of a biblical prophet, Barack Obama deliberately avids overt references to biblical themes, but the sub text is hope and expectation and he very astutely places himself right in the middle of the expanding web of hopes hi spins for his audiences. My lifwe is my message: this theme resonately well with the audiences and Barack Obama expands on this at every opportunity. Unlike Hillary Clinton or even John Mccain, Barack Obama is a polished wordssmith. He crafts every sentence into a statement of high principle and thereby taps into the emotional side of his audience. One may be unkind and say that this is only demogogery, but I am not saying that because in his words there is the faint echo of a truth waiting to be heard.

Barack Obama has created a coalition that spans all sections of American society and I think he will sail into the White HOuse if nominated. His support is increasing among white middle class and working class and rural voters and is eating up the base of Clinton's support. This social composition is hard to beat.

I found your post interesting and I too made an attempt at analysiong the Rhetoric of Obama in my blog here and I have post it for ypu.

May 7, 2008 09:29:22
Barack Obama deliberately avids overt references to biblical themes, but the sub text is hope and expectation and he very astutely places himself right in the middle of the expanding web of hopes hi spins for his audiences.


Obama has a 100% pro-abortion voting record. Where is the hope for the innocent child in the womb? Turns out under Obama the womb is a dangerous place to be.

May 7, 2008 12:27:22
eight in a straight row


eleven
May 7, 2008 14:07:56
The spectalular series of victories won by Mr Barack Obama, eight in a straight row, raises two questions. How can we expalin his success.


What success? That he can spin a good Socialist tale? Or tell people what they want to hear whether it's true or reasonable or not. Wasn't Hitler considered a good speaker...didn't he move the masses in much the same way?



May 7, 2008 15:49:39

The part of Mccarthy's crusade that pissed me off was his unrelenting terrorizing of writers, actors and such..

I did not know about JFK and RFK involvement and stand corrected, funny how that seems to never get mentioned when the Democrats are trashing McCarthy.

May 7, 2008 18:38:54
I did not know about JFK and RFK involvement and stand corrected, funny how that seems to never get mentioned when the Democrats are trashing McCarthy.


Yeah, almost as if it was planned or something.  
May 8, 2008 08:23:59

My Sentence would be " We have been lied to by the leader of losers"

Or a Conga Line of Suckholes.  (hahaha, i do love that.)

Stardock Forums v1.5.3099.12923
© 1995-2008 Stardock Corporation. All rights reserved.
All times are EST. The time is now 13:26:35
Server Load Time: 00:00:00   Page Render Time:
Copyright © 2008 Stardock Corporation. All Rights Reserved.