Saturday, July 5th 2008
Firefox 3 Release & Stardock Site Compatibility
Jul 30, 2008 12:59

Firefox 3.0 goes final and is scheduled for release on Tuesday, June 17th.

There are currently known incompatibilities between Firefox 3 and many of our sites and forums. For the most part, the sites function properly, but have formatting issues. A specific example are the login & password fields to log into these forums. In Firefox 3, instead of both being on the same line, they are stacked vertically.

We will be addressing these visual issues in time. Please do NOT post threads on the forums pointing out Firefox 3 site issues. They will be deleted. We are aware of the problems and will work as quickly as we can to resolve them.

Until posted otherwise, the only version of Firefox our sites support at the moment is Firefox 2.

Liberalism equals Fascism in America

By Posted March 6, 2008 02:57:47

I could not understand why liberals did not like the term liberal any more, I did a little research and found out why and was shocked to find out that what modern day liberals used to call themselves were conservatives and that conservatives were called liberals. Lincoln was a liberal republican. The conservative movement wanted to keep slavery and all the draconian laws that went with them.

 

Liberals are crafty if not smart, they in the 1950’s started calling themselves liberals in order to get the black vote. These same self described liberals used dogs and fire hoses and clubs to stop the voters registration movement, they lynched black leaders and did was we call today terrorism in order to maintain power and the status quo. If you bother to do your homework you will notice that all the political leaders that wanted to keep the status quo in the south were democrats. But democrats got such a bad name for their antics they took the term liberal democrat to show that there was a difference.

 

Liberalism; the philosophy that has as its aim the development of individual freedom which describes the Republican Party not the democrat party.

 

Often opposed to liberalism is the doctrine of conservatism in politics, the desire to maintain, or conserve, the existing order. Conservatives value the wisdom of the past and are generally opposed to widespread reform. This describes the democrat party perfectly.

 

After the conservatives ran the name into the dirt they stole the term liberal as I said and called republicans conservative and proceeded to hang on the republican party all the crap the conservatives did in the 50’s and 60’s Mr. William F. Buckley re-invented the conservative movement within the republican party and the neo liberals went on to tarnish the good name of liberalism as they did conservatism.

Then something happened in the democrat party, the infusion of socialism, something that is completely un-American, and over the next 40 years liberals tried to force socialism upon America. This has not worked so well so now liberals are trying something old and forgotten called fascism.

 

Fascism is a totalitarian philosophy of government that glorifies the state and nation and assigns to the state control over every aspect of national life. This describes the liberal democrats of Hillary Clinton’s generation. Fascism, especially in its early stages, is obliged to be antitheoretical and frankly opportunistic in order to appeal to many diverse groups. Nevertheless, a few key concepts are basic to it. First and most important is the glorification of the state and the total subordination of the individual to it. The state is defined as an organic whole into which individuals must be absorbed for their own benefit as well as the states. This "total state" is absolute in its methods and unlimited by law in its control and direction of its citizens.

 

In there mind everything stems from the state to the citizens. Mrs. Clinton has stated many times publicly that when she is elected president she will force big business to do what is right, she will force the citizens to do what is best for them in her eyes. This is not liberalism so she is correct to say she is not a liberal. We are now witnessing the next evolution of the democrat party, the change from liberalism to fascism. Mrs. Clinton does not wish to just run the government she wants to control our lives. I know this may sound like hyperbole and I wish it was but the facts are the facts. If we choose not to have health care she plans to mandate that all people must pay into the government for health care. The state will raise our children because it takes a village to raise a child and stupid parents might teach the wrong thing so the state will do that for us. The state will decide where we will work and what job to work at.

 

Look at her speeches and you will see this is her aim, I did not make up any of this I read her speeches and realized the connection between what she said and what three other people in history said that sound the same, Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler who based the National Socialist German Workers' party off of his hero at the time Mussolini, Francisco Franco of Spain. Spain is a fascist government but not so much since Franco died in 1975 and this is frightening to me.

 

Don’t get me wrong I am not saying that Senator Clinton is the next Hitler or Francisco Franco or that she is only one pushing this agenda if she fails to get elected there will be others to take her place in the next election she is just the first of many and the democrat party has no idea what is coming down the line. What I am saying is that if we allow this march to fascism to continue America as we know it will cease to exist in the very near future.

0 Karma 32 Replies 6 Referrals
May 6, 2008 17:30:18
What are you trying to say!? Are you a facist?


That is the question I am asking you. Will you answer it?
May 6, 2008 17:31:22
sorry it gave me a duplicate message.
let me take this space to say that liberals are some of the most racist people I have ever met.
May 6, 2008 18:54:26
let me take this space to say that liberals are some of the most racist people I have ever met.


That is being proven daily. And not by Hillary, but by the Obama supporters. She cannot say she is better than him (which candidate would not say that since they are running???) without the racists jumping up and down and finding a bogusman.
May 6, 2008 19:49:03
That is being proven daily. And not by Hillary, but by the Obama supporters. She cannot say she is better than him (which candidate would not say that since they are running???) without the racists jumping up and down and finding a bogusman.


A lot of black people would disagree that black people can even be racist. That being said, if Hilary claims to be "better than" Obama because of his race or because of an idea associated with race (intelligence, maybe), then she risks suspicion of racism.

It is not the fault of the black people that Americans have made it so hard not to be construed as racist. It is the fault of the strategy employed that involves a white majority attributing pretty much anything bad to certain minority groups.

Lazy blacks and hispanics. Stupid blacks and Mexican speaking hispanics. Why do they like unhealthy food? Why do they smell bad? Why are they angry and violent?
May 6, 2008 20:18:15
Lazy blacks and hispanics. Stupid blacks and Mexican speaking hispanics. Why do they like unhealthy food? Why do they smell bad? Why are they angry and violent?


Sorry but you will not be able to dispel those lies and myths because the liberal democrats are lily white and clean in their minds. They are racist and say those horrible things but when called on it will always point a finger at conservatives as the reason they think and act the way they do.

This is why Senator Obama will have a very hard time running for president because his own party hates him while the republicans just hate his ideas.
May 7, 2008 08:20:35
because of an idea associated with race (intelligence, maybe), then she risks suspicion of racism.


See that is political correctness rearing its stupid head. Race does not make you smart or stupid, and that is demonstrated daily by members of all races. Saying she is smarter is not racist (although it is being portrayed that way). It may be wishful thinking, but it is simply an opinion based upon the belief that she is best qualified. Saying she is smarter than McCain is not racism - and it is the same statement made with the same intent.

This is why Senator Obama will have a very hard time running for president because his own party hates him while the republicans just hate his ideas.


And unfortunately for the stupid liberals, they cannot separate ideas from the physical attributes of the person. They are the racists for believing that everything stems from their own prejudices.
May 7, 2008 18:33:47
And unfortunately for the stupid liberals, they cannot separate ideas from the physical attributes of the person. They are the racists for believing that everything stems from their own prejudices.


So true my friend. This is the reason I left the democrat party well that and I had to atone for voting for Jimmy Carter.   
Stardock Forums v1.5.3099.12923
© 1995-2008 Stardock Corporation. All rights reserved.
All times are EST. The time is now 19:57:33
Server Load Time: 00:00:00.0000016   Page Render Time:
Copyright © 2008 Stardock Corporation. All Rights Reserved.