"youre not seriously suggesting that candidate k will be less effective than candidate b because candidate k's domestic opponents succesfully ressurected a 30+ scam originally engineered by a president whom, prior to being forced out of office in disgrace for attempting to conceal his complicity in similar scams, had ordered us forces (in that president's capacity as their commander in chief) to violate the geneva accord--as reported truthfully by candidate k? " |
Scam? Nope. I'm not talking about anything other that what Kerry himself attested to. Kerry stated that he violated the Geneva conference, burned villages, etc. Now, the Left calls him a war hero and want him to be President.
I just find it odd that people can attack Bush for NOT going to a war they laud others for dodging. Those same people call Kerry a hero for committing "atrocities" in the same "unjust" war, , with no complaints until after he gets home and starts his political career..
Face it, if Moore were so inclined he could rip Kerry to shreds. There's nothing subjective about Kerry's testimony, and it is certainly going to be there for anyone that wants to tear away at the US to use.