Hope all you want but they didn't. It was they that ADDED it.



You mean they would have to give up their nintendo, Ipod, and other luxuries to afford this?? Oh the insanity of getting a person's priorities right.

If a person has that much value on having insurance then it would be a priority would it not? Would you subsidize me getting a house while I buy booze? No, you wouldn't. You'd tell me to clean up my act and save THAT money to pay for a place of residence. So why are you giving these people who make enough.

As I said I make less than 40K and my wife currently does not work. She doesn't have insurance Col. NO INSURANCE. But do you see me whinning that I am poor waiting for a bloody handout? No you do not. Why because I know that right now we cannot afford it just yet. We have other things that we must pay off/for first. We have chosen to not have insurance on her because we adjusted our priorities. That is the bottom line. You want to keep people lazy by giving them a pass on their poor choices but are the first to scream at Bush for his irresponsibilities? You want Bush to be responsible how about making the American Public responsible?

You give to 10 charities, you give to the church, yet you refuse to help out your own son.

And you call REPUBLICANS cold hearted!

actually he allowed a lady to waste expensive oil on his feet rather than give it to the poor.

Reply By: danielost Posted: Friday, October 19, 2007
Allowing the poor to suffer and have nothing is just what Christ was talking about.




Actually he allowed a lady to waste expensive oil on his feet rather than give it to the poor.

That oil was used on the feet of GOD and was not wasted!!!!!!!! That has nothing to do with the teaching in the Lazarus passage and you know it! You just do not to admit what Bush and all the people in Congress did to deny the children health coverage is like the rich man ignoring the needs of Lazarus. There is also a passage that says” it would be better to place a mill store around you neck and be tossed in the sea then to harm the children”.

Now you're quoting GROSSLY out of context, COL. I won't even begin to address your theological errors, which are APPALLING!

Christ did not go into the temple and steal the priests' money. He advocated INDIVIDUAL responsibility, NOT THEFT.

If your church teaches that Christ advocated theft to care for the poor and needy, it's a cult, plain and simple, COL.

Naw, my company's insurance sucks. Blue Cross of California. As I said, I'm in New England. Real cool. And it would be the 8k per year. No co-pay though. And I'm covered free.

This thread is hysterically funny.

No intelligent, conscious person can possibly miss the hypocritical bullshit posturing going on, by the Democrats and by Gene.

And to think, God had stinky feet.

Jesus got perfume poured on his feet, and then he had to go and wash his disciples feet, 'cuz they were too stinky for him...

The FOOLS! (completely sarcastic here)

Reply By: Adventure-Dude Posted: Friday, October 19, 2007
Now what the hell does GOD want with oily feet?


The oil was used on the feet of Christ who is GOD!

I just explained to you, I pay for all those things with my current salary. If I was making more, I would have $8k to pay for health insurance.

Christ did not go into the temple and steal the priests' money. He advocated INDIVIDUAL responsibility, NOT THEFT.


Taxing is not theft. In fact Christ held up the coin with Caesar’s image on it and said render unto Caesar what is CEASERS. YOU CAN BS ALL YOU WANT, THE WEALTHY WHO OPPOSSE HELPING THE POOR ARE NO DIFFERENT THEN THE RICH MAN IGNORING LAZERATH.


Reply By: Gideon MacLeish Posted: Friday, October 19, 2007
We support about 10 charities in addition to our church.


You give to 10 charities, you give to the church, yet you refuse to help out your own son.

Where did you get the idea we did not help our son? We have and continue to help all our children.

Col, there aren't very many here that are WEALTHY. And yet we still oppose. Baffling isn't it!