The attacks on 9/11 PROVED these warnings were correct and Bush DID NOTHING to defend our country!
I have answered that question. What you do NOT do is IGNORE warnings from the CIA to go on a WAR FOOTING!
These quotes make me so happy! For months you col Gene have cried how we went to war in Iraq on lies told by the President. Now you stated twice that based on a very few reports the President should have gone to war and invaded Afghanistan and gotten AQ and because he did not he should be impeached for it. We had the same type of reports of AQ in Iraq and the same type of intel telling us of WMD in Iraq. The President acted and you say he should be impeached for it.
You have proven my point that you are a political hack that does not care for the facts only the attack of the President. Yet you don’t seem to care that during Mr. Clinton’s administration, we were attacked and he did nothing. Let’s see what Mr. Clinton missed. There was the attack on the World Trade Center, the USS Cole, two embassies, the black hawk down incident, kobar towers and the planning and staging of his people for the second attack on he World Trade Center buildings and others all of them traced by the CIA to AQ and bin Laden. All before Mr. Clinton left office, all the information presented by the same CIA Director and all of it ignored.
Since Mr. Bush took over we had the 9/11 attacks and that was it. No ships, no embassies in short no attacks on US soil.
Bush and Congress could have taken down that "wall" if they had acted on the warnings from the CIA that lead up to us being attacked on 9/11 JUST as the CIA Warned!
This was documented on 9/11 that the president did not know of the wall when he asked CIA Director what information they passed to FBI, it was then that he found out how high and thick the wall was and ordered it ended. That was three or four hours after the attack.
