Ambassador Crocker Tells of Progress and Success in Iraq

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/19/AR2007071901393.html
While some people encourage our failure and want to ignore anything that might show any type of good or progress coming to Iraq, we see the Ambassadors statements are not all that terrible as some would like to make it.  Crocker made some interesting statements and he pointed out the negatives that are occurring and need to be addressed.  However, the Bush bashers don't care about that, they have already given up.

So let's see some comments that Ambassador Crocker told the Foreign Relations Committee.



"cautioned the Senate Foreign Relations Committee via a balky video hookup that a "non-conditioned withdrawal" of U.S. forces from Iraq -- such as a redeployment mandated by Congress -- could undo recent successes and give al-Qaeda "further room to operate."

-

"Both Crocker and Odierno asserted that the surge has had a significant impact on al-Qaeda in Iraq, the group held responsible for most of the spectacular suicide bombings in the country. And they said a potentially crucial phenomenon in Anbar province, where Sunni Arab tribes have turned against al-Qaeda, is spreading to parts of the capital and other provinces"

-

"I'm certainly not moving any goalposts," he said. "There are a lot of processes at work -- some of them positive, some of them negative." While Anbar is unique, "there are similar phenomena being repeated around the country," Crocker said."

-

"Crocker stressed that at the national level, he has been encouraged by the evolution of a "presidency council" made up of Iraq's Kurdish president, the country's two vice presidents -- one Shiite, the other Sunni -- and the Shiite prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki."

-

"The longer I am here, the more I am persuaded that progress in Iraq cannot be analyzed solely in terms of these discrete, precisely defined benchmarks," Crocker told the committee. He said this was because "in many cases, these benchmarks do not serve as reliable measures of everything that is important -- Iraqi attitudes toward each other and their willingness to work toward political reconciliation."

-

"With an additional 45 days to examine trends, "I'll be able to make a bit more accurate assessment," Odierno said. "What I imagine we'll have to do is do assessments that follow that initial assessment in September. . . ."


3,557 views 11 replies
Reply #1 Top
now who do i believe

doom and gloom gene

or

you

gee that is a hard

can i get some help from others please
Reply #2 Top
Oh my God. The guy actually had something good to say about Iraq? No way, that's not possible, Col said that things were bad there. How can you be saying the contrary? Now I have to decided whether you or Col gene is telling the truth.



Need more time to think.



Decisions, Decisions, Decisions.





Fooled ya! This was a no brainer. Obviously I would go with Col gene.



Not, fooled you again.
Reply #3 Top
Are you going to make me read his article to see why he cant spell, or how he can pervert the written word?
Reply #4 Top
Liberals can't stand to see any progress in Iraq.


Reply #5 Top
Gene is an Idiot and not to be believe as he picks and choses sentences from the bodies of printed material elsewhere to support his agenda of subverting America.

I heard Genes new islamic name is Ali Bal o ney Muhahhad o babel.
Reply #6 Top
Does anybody have a doubt that democrats would rather lose the war in Iraq, than lose the next election?
Reply #7 Top
(Citizen)Island DogJuly 20, 2007 11:37:47


Does anybody have a doubt that democrats would rather lose the war in Iraq, than lose the next election?


I refuse to believe that the common man democrat feels that way or that most of the freshmen Democrats that were elected in 07 feel that way either!

The so called leaders now, that's a different story, Reid, Pelosi, Murth, Durbin and gang would rather see us lose the war than them lose power.
Reply #8 Top
The so called leaders now, that's a different story, Reid, Pelosi, Murth, Durbin and gang would rather see us lose the war than them lose power.


The leadership is mostly what I was referring to.  I'm sure the everyday democrat who isn't a part of the loony base doesn't feel that way, but I have no doubt the democratic leaders do.


Reply #9 Top
(Citizen)Island DogJuly 20, 2007 11:58:28


The so called leaders now, that's a different story, Reid, Pelosi, Murth, Durbin and gang would rather see us lose the war than them lose power.


The leadership is mostly what I was referring to. I'm sure the everyday democrat who isn't a part of the loony base doesn't feel that way, but I have no doubt the democratic leaders do.


ok then make it plain, NEVER make me defend Democrats again or I will hunt you down and pull out all your nose hairs!!
Reply #10 Top
one at a time or all at once.
Reply #11 Top