"Well this time your guns are incorrect! Ever hear of the Americans Disability Act? What they are doing is "against" the law! " |
Wow, I wonder why conservatives are so suddenly supporting federal imposition on private business owners???
The problem is, any other time conservatives on this site would be on the side of the cab drivers. We've had discussions about government imposition against the will of the business owner before. We've talked about pharmacists being forced to carry RU-486 and other drugs they don't want to carry. We've seen discussions about gay people legally forcing landlords to rent to them.
On every one the conservative position is for the person complaining to shut the hell up and find another pharmacy/rental apartment/lunch counter/hotel, and so on. The only reason... the ONLY reason that we find some conservatives on this side this time is because the business owners are Muslim, and we disagree with their values.
So, like Gid, I have to side with the cab drivers. I got into a fight with Manopeace once about wheelchair access. I feel great pity for the handicapped that have to deal with obstacles in life, but I don't believe the government should force people to make accommodations for them if they don't want to. Once you invite government into business to that extent, we really don't own our businesses any more.
What disgusts me most about this is we are setting precedents that WILL be tossed back into our face. Someday a lawyer for NARAL will doubtlessly use this as precedent to say that pharmacists can't decide who they serve on religious grounds. Someday possibly we'll see litigious people of other faiths forcing particular menus on restaurants, or demanding the removal of offensive decor.
Why? Because this precedent makes it illegal for the business owner NOT to serve the interests of whoever wanders in. Regardless of beliefs, regardless of private ownership, you aren't allowed to refuse service. In future discussions I hope that is tasty when they feed it back to you.