It's often difficult to debate with left-wing extremists because they don't seem capable of even basic objectivity.
This article is a perfect example.
I wrote: "Ah so your argument is that the US is to be held to a different standard than France."
Mikimouse responsds: "go away and play little fella. How you came up with that is too beyond reality for me. Sorry though."
Someone else writes: "criticizing Spain is "bullying", yet criticizing the U.S. is perfectly fine"
To which Mikimouse responds: "well, consider the US as the biggest toughest guy in the schoolyard, then think of Spain an an ant"
So essentially yes, it's a double standard. This is why I don't usually read Mikmouse's blog. It's just not serious thinking. Vapid patronization of opposing arguments is the best you get from him. This is why the left has been so ineffective in recent years. This is what qualifies as "reasoning".
The bottom line is that the Spanish people, after being attacked by terrorists, switched their support to a candidate who promised to get them out of Iraq. The people were already against being in Iraq overall but the terrorist attack pushed them over the edge.
The US, understandably, criticizes Spain for this act.
I even put together a few other points to this such as the obvious fact that US troops have now had to take over the spots that the Spanish troops were holding. So now more Americans are at risk of death and dying. So common sense would expect the US government to try to do what it can to protect Americans such as trying to keep the Spanish there to help us. But that gets ignored by people like Mikimouse.